Cargando…

Endoscopic ultrasound artificial intelligence-assisted for prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Subepithelial lesions (SELs) are gastrointestinal tumors with heterogeneous malignant potential. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the leading method for evaluation, but without histopathological analysis, precise differentiation of SEL risk is limited. Artificial intelligence (AI) is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gomes, Rômulo Sérgio Araújo, de Oliveira, Guilherme Henrique Peixoto, de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux, Kotinda, Ana Paula Samy Tanaka, Matsubayashi, Carolina Ogawa, Hirsch, Bruno Salomão, Veras, Matheus de Oliveira, Ribeiro Jordão Sasso, João Guilherme, Trasolini, Roberto Paolo, Bernardo, Wanderley Marques, de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10473903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37663113
http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v15.i8.528
_version_ 1785100373456846848
author Gomes, Rômulo Sérgio Araújo
de Oliveira, Guilherme Henrique Peixoto
de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux
Kotinda, Ana Paula Samy Tanaka
Matsubayashi, Carolina Ogawa
Hirsch, Bruno Salomão
Veras, Matheus de Oliveira
Ribeiro Jordão Sasso, João Guilherme
Trasolini, Roberto Paolo
Bernardo, Wanderley Marques
de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux
author_facet Gomes, Rômulo Sérgio Araújo
de Oliveira, Guilherme Henrique Peixoto
de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux
Kotinda, Ana Paula Samy Tanaka
Matsubayashi, Carolina Ogawa
Hirsch, Bruno Salomão
Veras, Matheus de Oliveira
Ribeiro Jordão Sasso, João Guilherme
Trasolini, Roberto Paolo
Bernardo, Wanderley Marques
de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux
author_sort Gomes, Rômulo Sérgio Araújo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Subepithelial lesions (SELs) are gastrointestinal tumors with heterogeneous malignant potential. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the leading method for evaluation, but without histopathological analysis, precise differentiation of SEL risk is limited. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising aid for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal lesions in the absence of histopathology. AIM: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted EUS in diagnosing SELs, especially lesions originating from the muscularis propria layer. METHODS: Electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched. Patients of any sex and > 18 years, with SELs assessed by EUS AI-assisted, with previous histopathological diagnosis, and presented sufficient data values which were extracted to construct a 2 × 2 table. The reference standard was histopathology. The primary outcome was the accuracy of AI for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Secondary outcomes were AI-assisted EUS diagnosis for GIST vs gastrointestinal leiomyoma (GIL), the diagnostic performance of experienced endoscopists for GIST, and GIST vs GIL. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were calculated. The corresponding summary receiver operating characteristic curve and post-test probability were also analyzed. RESULTS: Eight retrospective studies with a total of 2355 patients and 44154 images were included in this meta-analysis. The AI-assisted EUS for GIST diagnosis showed a sensitivity of 92% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.95; P < 0.01), specificity of 80% (95%CI: 0.75-0.85; P < 0.01), and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.949. For diagnosis of GIST vs GIL by AI-assisted EUS, specificity was 90% (95%CI: 0.88-0.95; P = 0.02) and AUC of 0.966. The experienced endoscopists’ values were sensitivity of 72% (95%CI: 0.67-0.76; P < 0.01), specificity of 70% (95%CI: 0.64-0.76; P < 0.01), and AUC of 0.777 for GIST. Evaluating GIST vs GIL, the experts achieved a sensitivity of 73% (95%CI: 0.65-0.80; P < 0.01) and an AUC of 0.819. CONCLUSION: AI-assisted EUS has high diagnostic accuracy for fourth-layer SELs, especially for GIST, demonstrating superiority compared to experienced endoscopists’ and improving their diagnostic performance in the absence of invasive procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10473903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104739032023-09-03 Endoscopic ultrasound artificial intelligence-assisted for prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Gomes, Rômulo Sérgio Araújo de Oliveira, Guilherme Henrique Peixoto de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux Kotinda, Ana Paula Samy Tanaka Matsubayashi, Carolina Ogawa Hirsch, Bruno Salomão Veras, Matheus de Oliveira Ribeiro Jordão Sasso, João Guilherme Trasolini, Roberto Paolo Bernardo, Wanderley Marques de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux World J Gastrointest Endosc Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Subepithelial lesions (SELs) are gastrointestinal tumors with heterogeneous malignant potential. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the leading method for evaluation, but without histopathological analysis, precise differentiation of SEL risk is limited. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising aid for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal lesions in the absence of histopathology. AIM: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted EUS in diagnosing SELs, especially lesions originating from the muscularis propria layer. METHODS: Electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched. Patients of any sex and > 18 years, with SELs assessed by EUS AI-assisted, with previous histopathological diagnosis, and presented sufficient data values which were extracted to construct a 2 × 2 table. The reference standard was histopathology. The primary outcome was the accuracy of AI for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Secondary outcomes were AI-assisted EUS diagnosis for GIST vs gastrointestinal leiomyoma (GIL), the diagnostic performance of experienced endoscopists for GIST, and GIST vs GIL. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were calculated. The corresponding summary receiver operating characteristic curve and post-test probability were also analyzed. RESULTS: Eight retrospective studies with a total of 2355 patients and 44154 images were included in this meta-analysis. The AI-assisted EUS for GIST diagnosis showed a sensitivity of 92% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.95; P < 0.01), specificity of 80% (95%CI: 0.75-0.85; P < 0.01), and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.949. For diagnosis of GIST vs GIL by AI-assisted EUS, specificity was 90% (95%CI: 0.88-0.95; P = 0.02) and AUC of 0.966. The experienced endoscopists’ values were sensitivity of 72% (95%CI: 0.67-0.76; P < 0.01), specificity of 70% (95%CI: 0.64-0.76; P < 0.01), and AUC of 0.777 for GIST. Evaluating GIST vs GIL, the experts achieved a sensitivity of 73% (95%CI: 0.65-0.80; P < 0.01) and an AUC of 0.819. CONCLUSION: AI-assisted EUS has high diagnostic accuracy for fourth-layer SELs, especially for GIST, demonstrating superiority compared to experienced endoscopists’ and improving their diagnostic performance in the absence of invasive procedures. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-08-16 2023-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10473903/ /pubmed/37663113 http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v15.i8.528 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Gomes, Rômulo Sérgio Araújo
de Oliveira, Guilherme Henrique Peixoto
de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux
Kotinda, Ana Paula Samy Tanaka
Matsubayashi, Carolina Ogawa
Hirsch, Bruno Salomão
Veras, Matheus de Oliveira
Ribeiro Jordão Sasso, João Guilherme
Trasolini, Roberto Paolo
Bernardo, Wanderley Marques
de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux
Endoscopic ultrasound artificial intelligence-assisted for prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Endoscopic ultrasound artificial intelligence-assisted for prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Endoscopic ultrasound artificial intelligence-assisted for prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Endoscopic ultrasound artificial intelligence-assisted for prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic ultrasound artificial intelligence-assisted for prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Endoscopic ultrasound artificial intelligence-assisted for prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort endoscopic ultrasound artificial intelligence-assisted for prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10473903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37663113
http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v15.i8.528
work_keys_str_mv AT gomesromulosergioaraujo endoscopicultrasoundartificialintelligenceassistedforpredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT deoliveiraguilhermehenriquepeixoto endoscopicultrasoundartificialintelligenceassistedforpredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT demouradiogoturianihourneaux endoscopicultrasoundartificialintelligenceassistedforpredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kotindaanapaulasamytanaka endoscopicultrasoundartificialintelligenceassistedforpredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT matsubayashicarolinaogawa endoscopicultrasoundartificialintelligenceassistedforpredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hirschbrunosalomao endoscopicultrasoundartificialintelligenceassistedforpredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT verasmatheusdeoliveira endoscopicultrasoundartificialintelligenceassistedforpredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ribeirojordaosassojoaoguilherme endoscopicultrasoundartificialintelligenceassistedforpredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT trasolinirobertopaolo endoscopicultrasoundartificialintelligenceassistedforpredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bernardowanderleymarques endoscopicultrasoundartificialintelligenceassistedforpredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT demouraeduardoguimaraeshourneaux endoscopicultrasoundartificialintelligenceassistedforpredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis