Cargando…
Using bookmarking methods with orthopedic clinicians and patients with fractures produces score interpretation labels for patient-reported outcome measures
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) score ranges associated with descriptive labels (i.e., within normal limits, mild, moderate, severe) by using bookmarking methods with orthopedic clinicians and patients who have experienced a bone fr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10474193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37227662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03439-5 |
_version_ | 1785100438665691136 |
---|---|
author | Rothrock, Nan E. Wilson, Sandra A. Heng, Marilyn Hodor, Aleksandra Joeris, Alexander Kaat, Aaron J. McKelvey, Karma Schalet, Benjamin D. Vrahas, Mark |
author_facet | Rothrock, Nan E. Wilson, Sandra A. Heng, Marilyn Hodor, Aleksandra Joeris, Alexander Kaat, Aaron J. McKelvey, Karma Schalet, Benjamin D. Vrahas, Mark |
author_sort | Rothrock, Nan E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) score ranges associated with descriptive labels (i.e., within normal limits, mild, moderate, severe) by using bookmarking methods with orthopedic clinicians and patients who have experienced a bone fracture. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We created vignettes comprised of six items and responses from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Function, Physical Function, and Pain Interference item banks reflecting different levels of severity. Two groups of patients with fractures (n = 11) and two groups of orthopedic clinicians (n = 16) reviewed the vignettes and assigned descriptive labels independently and then discussed as a group until reaching consensus via a videoconference platform. RESULTS: PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference thresholds (T = 50, 40, 25/30 and T = 50/55, 60, 65/70, respectively) for patients with bone fractures were consistent with the results from other patient populations. Upper Extremity thresholds were about 10 points (1 SD) more severe (T = 40, 30, 25/20) compared to the other measures. Patient and clinician perspectives were similar. CONCLUSION: Bookmarking methods generated meaningful score thresholds for PROMIS measures. These thresholds between severity categories varied by domain. Threshold values for severity represent important supplemental information to interpret PROMIS scores clinically. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10474193 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104741932023-09-03 Using bookmarking methods with orthopedic clinicians and patients with fractures produces score interpretation labels for patient-reported outcome measures Rothrock, Nan E. Wilson, Sandra A. Heng, Marilyn Hodor, Aleksandra Joeris, Alexander Kaat, Aaron J. McKelvey, Karma Schalet, Benjamin D. Vrahas, Mark Qual Life Res Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) score ranges associated with descriptive labels (i.e., within normal limits, mild, moderate, severe) by using bookmarking methods with orthopedic clinicians and patients who have experienced a bone fracture. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We created vignettes comprised of six items and responses from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Function, Physical Function, and Pain Interference item banks reflecting different levels of severity. Two groups of patients with fractures (n = 11) and two groups of orthopedic clinicians (n = 16) reviewed the vignettes and assigned descriptive labels independently and then discussed as a group until reaching consensus via a videoconference platform. RESULTS: PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference thresholds (T = 50, 40, 25/30 and T = 50/55, 60, 65/70, respectively) for patients with bone fractures were consistent with the results from other patient populations. Upper Extremity thresholds were about 10 points (1 SD) more severe (T = 40, 30, 25/20) compared to the other measures. Patient and clinician perspectives were similar. CONCLUSION: Bookmarking methods generated meaningful score thresholds for PROMIS measures. These thresholds between severity categories varied by domain. Threshold values for severity represent important supplemental information to interpret PROMIS scores clinically. Springer International Publishing 2023-05-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10474193/ /pubmed/37227662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03439-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Rothrock, Nan E. Wilson, Sandra A. Heng, Marilyn Hodor, Aleksandra Joeris, Alexander Kaat, Aaron J. McKelvey, Karma Schalet, Benjamin D. Vrahas, Mark Using bookmarking methods with orthopedic clinicians and patients with fractures produces score interpretation labels for patient-reported outcome measures |
title | Using bookmarking methods with orthopedic clinicians and patients with fractures produces score interpretation labels for patient-reported outcome measures |
title_full | Using bookmarking methods with orthopedic clinicians and patients with fractures produces score interpretation labels for patient-reported outcome measures |
title_fullStr | Using bookmarking methods with orthopedic clinicians and patients with fractures produces score interpretation labels for patient-reported outcome measures |
title_full_unstemmed | Using bookmarking methods with orthopedic clinicians and patients with fractures produces score interpretation labels for patient-reported outcome measures |
title_short | Using bookmarking methods with orthopedic clinicians and patients with fractures produces score interpretation labels for patient-reported outcome measures |
title_sort | using bookmarking methods with orthopedic clinicians and patients with fractures produces score interpretation labels for patient-reported outcome measures |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10474193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37227662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03439-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rothrocknane usingbookmarkingmethodswithorthopediccliniciansandpatientswithfracturesproducesscoreinterpretationlabelsforpatientreportedoutcomemeasures AT wilsonsandraa usingbookmarkingmethodswithorthopediccliniciansandpatientswithfracturesproducesscoreinterpretationlabelsforpatientreportedoutcomemeasures AT hengmarilyn usingbookmarkingmethodswithorthopediccliniciansandpatientswithfracturesproducesscoreinterpretationlabelsforpatientreportedoutcomemeasures AT hodoraleksandra usingbookmarkingmethodswithorthopediccliniciansandpatientswithfracturesproducesscoreinterpretationlabelsforpatientreportedoutcomemeasures AT joerisalexander usingbookmarkingmethodswithorthopediccliniciansandpatientswithfracturesproducesscoreinterpretationlabelsforpatientreportedoutcomemeasures AT kaataaronj usingbookmarkingmethodswithorthopediccliniciansandpatientswithfracturesproducesscoreinterpretationlabelsforpatientreportedoutcomemeasures AT mckelveykarma usingbookmarkingmethodswithorthopediccliniciansandpatientswithfracturesproducesscoreinterpretationlabelsforpatientreportedoutcomemeasures AT schaletbenjamind usingbookmarkingmethodswithorthopediccliniciansandpatientswithfracturesproducesscoreinterpretationlabelsforpatientreportedoutcomemeasures AT vrahasmark usingbookmarkingmethodswithorthopediccliniciansandpatientswithfracturesproducesscoreinterpretationlabelsforpatientreportedoutcomemeasures |