Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Preformed Stainless Steel Crown's Crazing at Different Autoclave Cycles

AIM: The study aimed to assess and compare the crazing of preformed stainless steel (SS) crowns at various autoclave cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Around 15 SS crowns were subjected to zero (unsterilized), one, three, five, and seven autoclave cycles at 121°C, 15 psi for 20 minutes. After each auto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sowkarthicaa, Palanisamy, Mathian, Veerabadhran M, Gawthaman, Murugesan, Vinodh, Selvaraj, Manoharan, Muthusamy, Kamatchi, Mohanraj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10474392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37663221
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2608
_version_ 1785100482594734080
author Sowkarthicaa, Palanisamy
Mathian, Veerabadhran M
Gawthaman, Murugesan
Vinodh, Selvaraj
Manoharan, Muthusamy
Kamatchi, Mohanraj
author_facet Sowkarthicaa, Palanisamy
Mathian, Veerabadhran M
Gawthaman, Murugesan
Vinodh, Selvaraj
Manoharan, Muthusamy
Kamatchi, Mohanraj
author_sort Sowkarthicaa, Palanisamy
collection PubMed
description AIM: The study aimed to assess and compare the crazing of preformed stainless steel (SS) crowns at various autoclave cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Around 15 SS crowns were subjected to zero (unsterilized), one, three, five, and seven autoclave cycles at 121°C, 15 psi for 20 minutes. After each autoclave cycle, the mesial surface of each crown from occlusal to cervical portions was examined under a 40× stereomicroscope. Crazing was evaluated using Wickersham's criteria. RESULTS: One autoclave cycle does not produce any cracks, whereas the higher the number of autoclave cycles, the higher the cracks, which affects the prognosis of the SS crown treatment. CONCLUSION: Surface alterations of SS crowns after different autoclave cycles were significant. So, preformed SS crowns should be discarded after sterilizing once or twice during clinical practice. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Sowkarthicaa P, Mathian VM, Gawthaman M, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Preformed Stainless Steel Crown's Crazing at Different Autoclave Cycles. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(S-1):S77–S80.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10474392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104743922023-09-03 Comparative Evaluation of Preformed Stainless Steel Crown's Crazing at Different Autoclave Cycles Sowkarthicaa, Palanisamy Mathian, Veerabadhran M Gawthaman, Murugesan Vinodh, Selvaraj Manoharan, Muthusamy Kamatchi, Mohanraj Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Research AIM: The study aimed to assess and compare the crazing of preformed stainless steel (SS) crowns at various autoclave cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Around 15 SS crowns were subjected to zero (unsterilized), one, three, five, and seven autoclave cycles at 121°C, 15 psi for 20 minutes. After each autoclave cycle, the mesial surface of each crown from occlusal to cervical portions was examined under a 40× stereomicroscope. Crazing was evaluated using Wickersham's criteria. RESULTS: One autoclave cycle does not produce any cracks, whereas the higher the number of autoclave cycles, the higher the cracks, which affects the prognosis of the SS crown treatment. CONCLUSION: Surface alterations of SS crowns after different autoclave cycles were significant. So, preformed SS crowns should be discarded after sterilizing once or twice during clinical practice. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Sowkarthicaa P, Mathian VM, Gawthaman M, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Preformed Stainless Steel Crown's Crazing at Different Autoclave Cycles. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(S-1):S77–S80. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10474392/ /pubmed/37663221 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2608 Text en Copyright © 2023; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2023 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sowkarthicaa, Palanisamy
Mathian, Veerabadhran M
Gawthaman, Murugesan
Vinodh, Selvaraj
Manoharan, Muthusamy
Kamatchi, Mohanraj
Comparative Evaluation of Preformed Stainless Steel Crown's Crazing at Different Autoclave Cycles
title Comparative Evaluation of Preformed Stainless Steel Crown's Crazing at Different Autoclave Cycles
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Preformed Stainless Steel Crown's Crazing at Different Autoclave Cycles
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Preformed Stainless Steel Crown's Crazing at Different Autoclave Cycles
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Preformed Stainless Steel Crown's Crazing at Different Autoclave Cycles
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Preformed Stainless Steel Crown's Crazing at Different Autoclave Cycles
title_sort comparative evaluation of preformed stainless steel crown's crazing at different autoclave cycles
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10474392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37663221
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2608
work_keys_str_mv AT sowkarthicaapalanisamy comparativeevaluationofpreformedstainlesssteelcrownscrazingatdifferentautoclavecycles
AT mathianveerabadhranm comparativeevaluationofpreformedstainlesssteelcrownscrazingatdifferentautoclavecycles
AT gawthamanmurugesan comparativeevaluationofpreformedstainlesssteelcrownscrazingatdifferentautoclavecycles
AT vinodhselvaraj comparativeevaluationofpreformedstainlesssteelcrownscrazingatdifferentautoclavecycles
AT manoharanmuthusamy comparativeevaluationofpreformedstainlesssteelcrownscrazingatdifferentautoclavecycles
AT kamatchimohanraj comparativeevaluationofpreformedstainlesssteelcrownscrazingatdifferentautoclavecycles