Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Chitosan, Titanium Dioxide Nanopowder and Nanohydroxyapatite: An In Vitro Study

AIM: To evaluate the effect of different add-ons on the flexural strength (FS) of glass ionomer cement (GIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Around 72 samples were fabricated and divided among the following six different groups: group I—control (conventional GIC—nonmodified), group II—GIC powder modified wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Showkat, Insha, Chaudhary, Seema, Sinha, Ashish A, Manuja, Naveen, Telgi, Chaitra R, Priya, Neha, Kak, Minha M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10474399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37663222
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2617
_version_ 1785100484335370240
author Showkat, Insha
Chaudhary, Seema
Sinha, Ashish A
Manuja, Naveen
Telgi, Chaitra R
Priya, Neha
Kak, Minha M
author_facet Showkat, Insha
Chaudhary, Seema
Sinha, Ashish A
Manuja, Naveen
Telgi, Chaitra R
Priya, Neha
Kak, Minha M
author_sort Showkat, Insha
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the effect of different add-ons on the flexural strength (FS) of glass ionomer cement (GIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Around 72 samples were fabricated and divided among the following six different groups: group I—control (conventional GIC—nonmodified), group II—GIC powder modified with 3% titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) and liquid is unmodified, group III—powder modified with 10% nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) and liquid is unmodified, group IV—powder is unmodified and Liquid is modified with 10% chitosan (CH), group V—powder is modified with 3% TiO(2) and liquid is modified with 10% CH, and group VI—powder is modified with 10% nHA and liquid is modified with 10% CH. The samples were then subjected to a three-point bending test on a universal testing machine for the evaluation of FS. The results obtained were analyzed statistically using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. RESULT: The mean FS value of group V depicts significantly high FS among all groups (29.42 ± 3.35). A significant difference was present in FS amongst all the groups that is groups V>II>IV>VI>III>I. CONCLUSION: Glass ionomer cement (GIC) powder can be modified with nHA, nanotitanium, and GIC liquid can be modified with CH to improve its FS. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Glass ionomer cement (GIC) supplemented with additives like nanoparticles (NPs) and CH can be used as an enhanced filling material due to its potential antibacterial properties and in areas with a high masticatory load. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Showkat I, Chaudhary S, Sinha AA, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Chitosan, Titanium Dioxide Nanopowder and Nanohydroxyapatite: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(S-1):S72–S76.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10474399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104743992023-09-03 Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Chitosan, Titanium Dioxide Nanopowder and Nanohydroxyapatite: An In Vitro Study Showkat, Insha Chaudhary, Seema Sinha, Ashish A Manuja, Naveen Telgi, Chaitra R Priya, Neha Kak, Minha M Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Research AIM: To evaluate the effect of different add-ons on the flexural strength (FS) of glass ionomer cement (GIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Around 72 samples were fabricated and divided among the following six different groups: group I—control (conventional GIC—nonmodified), group II—GIC powder modified with 3% titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) and liquid is unmodified, group III—powder modified with 10% nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) and liquid is unmodified, group IV—powder is unmodified and Liquid is modified with 10% chitosan (CH), group V—powder is modified with 3% TiO(2) and liquid is modified with 10% CH, and group VI—powder is modified with 10% nHA and liquid is modified with 10% CH. The samples were then subjected to a three-point bending test on a universal testing machine for the evaluation of FS. The results obtained were analyzed statistically using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. RESULT: The mean FS value of group V depicts significantly high FS among all groups (29.42 ± 3.35). A significant difference was present in FS amongst all the groups that is groups V>II>IV>VI>III>I. CONCLUSION: Glass ionomer cement (GIC) powder can be modified with nHA, nanotitanium, and GIC liquid can be modified with CH to improve its FS. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Glass ionomer cement (GIC) supplemented with additives like nanoparticles (NPs) and CH can be used as an enhanced filling material due to its potential antibacterial properties and in areas with a high masticatory load. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Showkat I, Chaudhary S, Sinha AA, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Chitosan, Titanium Dioxide Nanopowder and Nanohydroxyapatite: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(S-1):S72–S76. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10474399/ /pubmed/37663222 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2617 Text en Copyright © 2023; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2023 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Showkat, Insha
Chaudhary, Seema
Sinha, Ashish A
Manuja, Naveen
Telgi, Chaitra R
Priya, Neha
Kak, Minha M
Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Chitosan, Titanium Dioxide Nanopowder and Nanohydroxyapatite: An In Vitro Study
title Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Chitosan, Titanium Dioxide Nanopowder and Nanohydroxyapatite: An In Vitro Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Chitosan, Titanium Dioxide Nanopowder and Nanohydroxyapatite: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Chitosan, Titanium Dioxide Nanopowder and Nanohydroxyapatite: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Chitosan, Titanium Dioxide Nanopowder and Nanohydroxyapatite: An In Vitro Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Chitosan, Titanium Dioxide Nanopowder and Nanohydroxyapatite: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of flexural strength of conventional glass ionomer cement and glass ionomer cement modified with chitosan, titanium dioxide nanopowder and nanohydroxyapatite: an in vitro study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10474399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37663222
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2617
work_keys_str_mv AT showkatinsha comparativeevaluationofflexuralstrengthofconventionalglassionomercementandglassionomercementmodifiedwithchitosantitaniumdioxidenanopowderandnanohydroxyapatiteaninvitrostudy
AT chaudharyseema comparativeevaluationofflexuralstrengthofconventionalglassionomercementandglassionomercementmodifiedwithchitosantitaniumdioxidenanopowderandnanohydroxyapatiteaninvitrostudy
AT sinhaashisha comparativeevaluationofflexuralstrengthofconventionalglassionomercementandglassionomercementmodifiedwithchitosantitaniumdioxidenanopowderandnanohydroxyapatiteaninvitrostudy
AT manujanaveen comparativeevaluationofflexuralstrengthofconventionalglassionomercementandglassionomercementmodifiedwithchitosantitaniumdioxidenanopowderandnanohydroxyapatiteaninvitrostudy
AT telgichaitrar comparativeevaluationofflexuralstrengthofconventionalglassionomercementandglassionomercementmodifiedwithchitosantitaniumdioxidenanopowderandnanohydroxyapatiteaninvitrostudy
AT priyaneha comparativeevaluationofflexuralstrengthofconventionalglassionomercementandglassionomercementmodifiedwithchitosantitaniumdioxidenanopowderandnanohydroxyapatiteaninvitrostudy
AT kakminham comparativeevaluationofflexuralstrengthofconventionalglassionomercementandglassionomercementmodifiedwithchitosantitaniumdioxidenanopowderandnanohydroxyapatiteaninvitrostudy