Cargando…
A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study
AIM: The study aimed to compare and assess the dissolution rate, color stability, and other mechanical parameters, such as compressive and flexural strength, of three distinct posterior restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The three posterior restorative material...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10474400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37663212 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2577 |
_version_ | 1785100484573396992 |
---|---|
author | Raman, Vigneshwar Srinivasan, Daya Eagappan, AR Senthil Harish, SS |
author_facet | Raman, Vigneshwar Srinivasan, Daya Eagappan, AR Senthil Harish, SS |
author_sort | Raman, Vigneshwar |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The study aimed to compare and assess the dissolution rate, color stability, and other mechanical parameters, such as compressive and flexural strength, of three distinct posterior restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The three posterior restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry are divided into group I—Zirconomer, group II—Composite, and group III—Cention N. Around 111 cylindrical specimens were grouped into three groups of 37 each. According to the manufacturer's standards, all materials were proportioned and handled. The materials were thermocycler in a chewing simulator and were subjected to various tests to estimate the dissolution rate, compressive strength, flexural strength, and color stability of the three individual groups. RESULTS: The dissolution rate was highest in Zirconomer, followed by Cention N and Composite, which were highly significant (p = 0.05). Compressive strength was highest with Cention N, followed by Composite and Zirconomer, which was highly important (p = 0.05). Cention N had the greatest flexural strength, followed by Composite and Zirconomer, which were highly significant (p = 0.05). Finally, the Composite had the highest color stability, followed by Cention N and Zirconomer among the three groups. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that resin-based restorative materials outperform glass ionomer-based Zirconomer cement in terms of dissolution rate, compressive strength, flexural strength, and color stability. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Because of the widespread improvement in dental materials, many dental restorative types of cement have emerged on the market. The features of good restorative materials are mechanical strength, fluid dissolution rate, and retention. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Raman V, Srinivasan D, AR SE, et al. A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(S-1):S20–S26. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10474400 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104744002023-09-03 A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study Raman, Vigneshwar Srinivasan, Daya Eagappan, AR Senthil Harish, SS Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Research AIM: The study aimed to compare and assess the dissolution rate, color stability, and other mechanical parameters, such as compressive and flexural strength, of three distinct posterior restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The three posterior restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry are divided into group I—Zirconomer, group II—Composite, and group III—Cention N. Around 111 cylindrical specimens were grouped into three groups of 37 each. According to the manufacturer's standards, all materials were proportioned and handled. The materials were thermocycler in a chewing simulator and were subjected to various tests to estimate the dissolution rate, compressive strength, flexural strength, and color stability of the three individual groups. RESULTS: The dissolution rate was highest in Zirconomer, followed by Cention N and Composite, which were highly significant (p = 0.05). Compressive strength was highest with Cention N, followed by Composite and Zirconomer, which was highly important (p = 0.05). Cention N had the greatest flexural strength, followed by Composite and Zirconomer, which were highly significant (p = 0.05). Finally, the Composite had the highest color stability, followed by Cention N and Zirconomer among the three groups. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that resin-based restorative materials outperform glass ionomer-based Zirconomer cement in terms of dissolution rate, compressive strength, flexural strength, and color stability. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Because of the widespread improvement in dental materials, many dental restorative types of cement have emerged on the market. The features of good restorative materials are mechanical strength, fluid dissolution rate, and retention. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Raman V, Srinivasan D, AR SE, et al. A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(S-1):S20–S26. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10474400/ /pubmed/37663212 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2577 Text en Copyright © 2023; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2023 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Raman, Vigneshwar Srinivasan, Daya Eagappan, AR Senthil Harish, SS A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study |
title | A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study |
title_full | A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study |
title_short | A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of dissolution rate of three different posterior restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10474400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37663212 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2577 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramanvigneshwar acomparativeevaluationofdissolutionrateofthreedifferentposteriorrestorativematerialsusedinpediatricdentistryaninvitrostudy AT srinivasandaya acomparativeevaluationofdissolutionrateofthreedifferentposteriorrestorativematerialsusedinpediatricdentistryaninvitrostudy AT eagappanarsenthil acomparativeevaluationofdissolutionrateofthreedifferentposteriorrestorativematerialsusedinpediatricdentistryaninvitrostudy AT harishss acomparativeevaluationofdissolutionrateofthreedifferentposteriorrestorativematerialsusedinpediatricdentistryaninvitrostudy AT ramanvigneshwar comparativeevaluationofdissolutionrateofthreedifferentposteriorrestorativematerialsusedinpediatricdentistryaninvitrostudy AT srinivasandaya comparativeevaluationofdissolutionrateofthreedifferentposteriorrestorativematerialsusedinpediatricdentistryaninvitrostudy AT eagappanarsenthil comparativeevaluationofdissolutionrateofthreedifferentposteriorrestorativematerialsusedinpediatricdentistryaninvitrostudy AT harishss comparativeevaluationofdissolutionrateofthreedifferentposteriorrestorativematerialsusedinpediatricdentistryaninvitrostudy |