Cargando…

A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study

AIM: The study aimed to compare and assess the dissolution rate, color stability, and other mechanical parameters, such as compressive and flexural strength, of three distinct posterior restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The three posterior restorative material...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raman, Vigneshwar, Srinivasan, Daya, Eagappan, AR Senthil, Harish, SS
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10474400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37663212
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2577
_version_ 1785100484573396992
author Raman, Vigneshwar
Srinivasan, Daya
Eagappan, AR Senthil
Harish, SS
author_facet Raman, Vigneshwar
Srinivasan, Daya
Eagappan, AR Senthil
Harish, SS
author_sort Raman, Vigneshwar
collection PubMed
description AIM: The study aimed to compare and assess the dissolution rate, color stability, and other mechanical parameters, such as compressive and flexural strength, of three distinct posterior restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The three posterior restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry are divided into group I—Zirconomer, group II—Composite, and group III—Cention N. Around 111 cylindrical specimens were grouped into three groups of 37 each. According to the manufacturer's standards, all materials were proportioned and handled. The materials were thermocycler in a chewing simulator and were subjected to various tests to estimate the dissolution rate, compressive strength, flexural strength, and color stability of the three individual groups. RESULTS: The dissolution rate was highest in Zirconomer, followed by Cention N and Composite, which were highly significant (p = 0.05). Compressive strength was highest with Cention N, followed by Composite and Zirconomer, which was highly important (p = 0.05). Cention N had the greatest flexural strength, followed by Composite and Zirconomer, which were highly significant (p = 0.05). Finally, the Composite had the highest color stability, followed by Cention N and Zirconomer among the three groups. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that resin-based restorative materials outperform glass ionomer-based Zirconomer cement in terms of dissolution rate, compressive strength, flexural strength, and color stability. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Because of the widespread improvement in dental materials, many dental restorative types of cement have emerged on the market. The features of good restorative materials are mechanical strength, fluid dissolution rate, and retention. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Raman V, Srinivasan D, AR SE, et al. A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(S-1):S20–S26.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10474400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104744002023-09-03 A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study Raman, Vigneshwar Srinivasan, Daya Eagappan, AR Senthil Harish, SS Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Research AIM: The study aimed to compare and assess the dissolution rate, color stability, and other mechanical parameters, such as compressive and flexural strength, of three distinct posterior restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The three posterior restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry are divided into group I—Zirconomer, group II—Composite, and group III—Cention N. Around 111 cylindrical specimens were grouped into three groups of 37 each. According to the manufacturer's standards, all materials were proportioned and handled. The materials were thermocycler in a chewing simulator and were subjected to various tests to estimate the dissolution rate, compressive strength, flexural strength, and color stability of the three individual groups. RESULTS: The dissolution rate was highest in Zirconomer, followed by Cention N and Composite, which were highly significant (p = 0.05). Compressive strength was highest with Cention N, followed by Composite and Zirconomer, which was highly important (p = 0.05). Cention N had the greatest flexural strength, followed by Composite and Zirconomer, which were highly significant (p = 0.05). Finally, the Composite had the highest color stability, followed by Cention N and Zirconomer among the three groups. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that resin-based restorative materials outperform glass ionomer-based Zirconomer cement in terms of dissolution rate, compressive strength, flexural strength, and color stability. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Because of the widespread improvement in dental materials, many dental restorative types of cement have emerged on the market. The features of good restorative materials are mechanical strength, fluid dissolution rate, and retention. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Raman V, Srinivasan D, AR SE, et al. A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(S-1):S20–S26. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10474400/ /pubmed/37663212 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2577 Text en Copyright © 2023; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2023 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Raman, Vigneshwar
Srinivasan, Daya
Eagappan, AR Senthil
Harish, SS
A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study
title A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study
title_full A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study
title_short A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of dissolution rate of three different posterior restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry: an in vitro study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10474400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37663212
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2577
work_keys_str_mv AT ramanvigneshwar acomparativeevaluationofdissolutionrateofthreedifferentposteriorrestorativematerialsusedinpediatricdentistryaninvitrostudy
AT srinivasandaya acomparativeevaluationofdissolutionrateofthreedifferentposteriorrestorativematerialsusedinpediatricdentistryaninvitrostudy
AT eagappanarsenthil acomparativeevaluationofdissolutionrateofthreedifferentposteriorrestorativematerialsusedinpediatricdentistryaninvitrostudy
AT harishss acomparativeevaluationofdissolutionrateofthreedifferentposteriorrestorativematerialsusedinpediatricdentistryaninvitrostudy
AT ramanvigneshwar comparativeevaluationofdissolutionrateofthreedifferentposteriorrestorativematerialsusedinpediatricdentistryaninvitrostudy
AT srinivasandaya comparativeevaluationofdissolutionrateofthreedifferentposteriorrestorativematerialsusedinpediatricdentistryaninvitrostudy
AT eagappanarsenthil comparativeevaluationofdissolutionrateofthreedifferentposteriorrestorativematerialsusedinpediatricdentistryaninvitrostudy
AT harishss comparativeevaluationofdissolutionrateofthreedifferentposteriorrestorativematerialsusedinpediatricdentistryaninvitrostudy