A comparative analysis between intra articular injections of injectable platelet rich fibrin versus platelet rich plasma in the management of temporomandibular disorders: A randomized control trial

BACKGROUND: Platelet concentrate has become an increasingly popular alternative source of growth factors for several types of dental and surgical procedures. It improves healing and stimulates cell proliferation, matrix remodeling, and angiogenesis. The injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) has various advantages over platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of intra-articular injections of i-PRF versus PRP in the management of temporomandibular disorders (TDMs). METHOD: The prospective randomized study involved 14 patients (N = 28 joints) of internal derangement between the age groups of 20 to 50 years divided randomly into two groups with seven patients (N = 14 joints) in each group. For all the patients, arthrocentesis was carried out in the first sitting followed by intra-articular injections of PRP and i-PRF in group I and group II, respectively, at 1-month interval for 6 months. A single surgeon has performed the procedure. All patients were assessed clinically for pain, maximal mouth opening (MMO), lateral movement, protrusive movement, and joint sounds and radiographically for disc position and joint effusion (JE). RESULTS: Pain reduction, MMO, lateral movement, protrusive movement, and joint sounds were significant in both groups with more significance in group II. Disc position had improved toward normal in both groups and showed significant changes in both groups at the 9-month follow-up with better results in group II. CONCLUSION: PRP and i-PRF injections are regarded as simple and safe methods with potential beneficial effects and are cost-effective. In this preliminary study, i-PRF has been found to be scoring better in terms of efficacy over PRP across all set parameters.