Cargando…

Studying temporal titre evolution of commercial SARS-CoV-2 assays reveals significant shortcomings of using BAU standardization for comparison

BACKGROUND: Measuring specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies has become one of the main epidemiological tools to survey the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, but also vaccination response. The WHO made available a set of well-characterized samples derived from recovered individuals to allow normalization be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kroidl, Inge, Winter, Simon, Rubio-Acero, Raquel, Bakuli, Abhishek, Geldmacher, Christof, Eser, Tabea M., Déak, Flora, Horn, Sacha, Zielke, Anna, Ahmed, Mohamed I. M., Diepers, Paulina, Guggenbühl, Jessica, Frese, Jonathan, Bruger, Jan, Puchinger, Kerstin, Reich, Jakob, Falk, Philine, Markgraf, Alisa, Fensterseifer, Heike, Paunovic, Ivana, Thomschke, Angelika, Pritsch, Michael, Riess, Friedrich, Saathoff, Elmar, Hoelscher, Michael, Olbrich, Laura, Castelletti, Noemi, Wieser, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10474769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37658454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-023-02167-z
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Measuring specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies has become one of the main epidemiological tools to survey the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, but also vaccination response. The WHO made available a set of well-characterized samples derived from recovered individuals to allow normalization between different quantitative anti-Spike assays to defined Binding Antibody Units (BAU). METHODS: To assess sero-responses longitudinally, a cohort of ninety-nine SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive subjects was followed up together with forty-five vaccinees without previous infection but with two vaccinations. Sero-responses were evaluated using a total of six different assays: four measuring anti-Spike proteins (converted to BAU), one measuring anti-Nucleocapsid proteins and one SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization. Both cohorts were evaluated using the Euroimmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2-ELISA anti-S1 IgG and the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 anti-S1 assay. RESULTS: In SARS-CoV-2-convalesce subjects, the BAU-sero-responses of Euroimmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2-ELISA anti-S1 IgG and Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 anti-S1 peaked both at 47 (43–51) days, the first assay followed by a slow decay thereafter (> 208 days), while the second assay not presenting any decay within one year. Both assay values in BAUs are only equivalent a few months after infection, elsewhere correction factors up to 10 are necessary. In contrast, in infection-naive vaccinees the assays perform similarly. CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that the establishment of a protective correlate or vaccination booster recommendation based on different assays, although BAU-standardised, is still challenging. At the moment the characteristics of the available assays used are not related, and the BAU-standardisation is unable to correct for that. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12985-023-02167-z.