Cargando…

The impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine

The objective was to evaluate the impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine. Data included 735 multiparous Landrace × Large White F1 females. Sow underlined traits consisted of total teat number (TT), functional teat number (FT), nonfunctional teat number (NFT), and number...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obermier, Dalton R, Howard, Jeremy Thomas, Gray, Kent A, Knauer, Mark T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10474911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37662897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad100
_version_ 1785100607087968256
author Obermier, Dalton R
Howard, Jeremy Thomas
Gray, Kent A
Knauer, Mark T
author_facet Obermier, Dalton R
Howard, Jeremy Thomas
Gray, Kent A
Knauer, Mark T
author_sort Obermier, Dalton R
collection PubMed
description The objective was to evaluate the impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine. Data included 735 multiparous Landrace × Large White F1 females. Sow underlined traits consisted of total teat number (TT), functional teat number (FT), nonfunctional teat number (NFT), and number of functional mammary glands (FMG). Weaning traits were calculated for both the biological and the nurse dam. For the biological dam, litter size at weaning (LSW) included a sow’s biological piglets regardless of cross-fostering. For nurse dam, number weaned (NW) included the piglets a sow weaned. For the biological dam, piglet survival (PS) was calculated as litter size at weaning / (total number born × 100). Linear regression estimates were calculated in RStudio v. 1.1.456 and variance components were estimated using GIBBS3F90. Average total number born, number born alive, TT, FT, NFT, and FMG were 14.22, 13.12, 14.43, 13.96, 0.42, and 10.7, respectively. An increase in one FT enhanced (P < 0.05) LSW by 0.32 piglets and NW by 0.33 piglets. Similarly, an increase in one FT improved (P < 0.05) PS by 1.63% and reduced (P < 0.05) preweaning mortality by 2.73%. However, an increase in one FT reduced (P < 0.05) average piglet weaning weight (WW) for biological and nurse dams by 35 and 94 g, respectively. Yet an increase in one FT enhanced (P < 0.05) litter weaning weight (LWW) for biological and nurse dams by 1.3 and 1.5 kg, respectively. Heritability estimates for TT, FT, NFT, FMG, WW, LWW, LSW, and PS were 0.25, 0.22, 0.53, 0.18, 0.21, 0.22, 0.16, and 0.18, respectively. Genetic correlation estimates between FT with TT, NFT, and FMG were 0.79, 0.09, and 0.28, respectively. Estimated genetic correlations between TT with WW, LWW, LSW, and PS were 0.37, 0.38, 0.11, and −0.19, respectively. Genetic correlation estimates between FT with WW, LWW, LSW, and PS were 0.44, 0.49, 0.39, and 0.35, respectively. Results suggest increasing functional teat number would enhance both piglet survival and reproductive throughput.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10474911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104749112023-09-03 The impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine Obermier, Dalton R Howard, Jeremy Thomas Gray, Kent A Knauer, Mark T Transl Anim Sci Animal Genetics and Genomics The objective was to evaluate the impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine. Data included 735 multiparous Landrace × Large White F1 females. Sow underlined traits consisted of total teat number (TT), functional teat number (FT), nonfunctional teat number (NFT), and number of functional mammary glands (FMG). Weaning traits were calculated for both the biological and the nurse dam. For the biological dam, litter size at weaning (LSW) included a sow’s biological piglets regardless of cross-fostering. For nurse dam, number weaned (NW) included the piglets a sow weaned. For the biological dam, piglet survival (PS) was calculated as litter size at weaning / (total number born × 100). Linear regression estimates were calculated in RStudio v. 1.1.456 and variance components were estimated using GIBBS3F90. Average total number born, number born alive, TT, FT, NFT, and FMG were 14.22, 13.12, 14.43, 13.96, 0.42, and 10.7, respectively. An increase in one FT enhanced (P < 0.05) LSW by 0.32 piglets and NW by 0.33 piglets. Similarly, an increase in one FT improved (P < 0.05) PS by 1.63% and reduced (P < 0.05) preweaning mortality by 2.73%. However, an increase in one FT reduced (P < 0.05) average piglet weaning weight (WW) for biological and nurse dams by 35 and 94 g, respectively. Yet an increase in one FT enhanced (P < 0.05) litter weaning weight (LWW) for biological and nurse dams by 1.3 and 1.5 kg, respectively. Heritability estimates for TT, FT, NFT, FMG, WW, LWW, LSW, and PS were 0.25, 0.22, 0.53, 0.18, 0.21, 0.22, 0.16, and 0.18, respectively. Genetic correlation estimates between FT with TT, NFT, and FMG were 0.79, 0.09, and 0.28, respectively. Estimated genetic correlations between TT with WW, LWW, LSW, and PS were 0.37, 0.38, 0.11, and −0.19, respectively. Genetic correlation estimates between FT with WW, LWW, LSW, and PS were 0.44, 0.49, 0.39, and 0.35, respectively. Results suggest increasing functional teat number would enhance both piglet survival and reproductive throughput. Oxford University Press 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10474911/ /pubmed/37662897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad100 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Animal Genetics and Genomics
Obermier, Dalton R
Howard, Jeremy Thomas
Gray, Kent A
Knauer, Mark T
The impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine
title The impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine
title_full The impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine
title_fullStr The impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine
title_full_unstemmed The impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine
title_short The impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine
title_sort impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine
topic Animal Genetics and Genomics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10474911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37662897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad100
work_keys_str_mv AT obermierdaltonr theimpactoffunctionalteatnumberonreproductivethroughputinswine
AT howardjeremythomas theimpactoffunctionalteatnumberonreproductivethroughputinswine
AT graykenta theimpactoffunctionalteatnumberonreproductivethroughputinswine
AT knauermarkt theimpactoffunctionalteatnumberonreproductivethroughputinswine
AT obermierdaltonr impactoffunctionalteatnumberonreproductivethroughputinswine
AT howardjeremythomas impactoffunctionalteatnumberonreproductivethroughputinswine
AT graykenta impactoffunctionalteatnumberonreproductivethroughputinswine
AT knauermarkt impactoffunctionalteatnumberonreproductivethroughputinswine