Cargando…
The impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine
The objective was to evaluate the impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine. Data included 735 multiparous Landrace × Large White F1 females. Sow underlined traits consisted of total teat number (TT), functional teat number (FT), nonfunctional teat number (NFT), and number...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10474911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37662897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad100 |
_version_ | 1785100607087968256 |
---|---|
author | Obermier, Dalton R Howard, Jeremy Thomas Gray, Kent A Knauer, Mark T |
author_facet | Obermier, Dalton R Howard, Jeremy Thomas Gray, Kent A Knauer, Mark T |
author_sort | Obermier, Dalton R |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective was to evaluate the impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine. Data included 735 multiparous Landrace × Large White F1 females. Sow underlined traits consisted of total teat number (TT), functional teat number (FT), nonfunctional teat number (NFT), and number of functional mammary glands (FMG). Weaning traits were calculated for both the biological and the nurse dam. For the biological dam, litter size at weaning (LSW) included a sow’s biological piglets regardless of cross-fostering. For nurse dam, number weaned (NW) included the piglets a sow weaned. For the biological dam, piglet survival (PS) was calculated as litter size at weaning / (total number born × 100). Linear regression estimates were calculated in RStudio v. 1.1.456 and variance components were estimated using GIBBS3F90. Average total number born, number born alive, TT, FT, NFT, and FMG were 14.22, 13.12, 14.43, 13.96, 0.42, and 10.7, respectively. An increase in one FT enhanced (P < 0.05) LSW by 0.32 piglets and NW by 0.33 piglets. Similarly, an increase in one FT improved (P < 0.05) PS by 1.63% and reduced (P < 0.05) preweaning mortality by 2.73%. However, an increase in one FT reduced (P < 0.05) average piglet weaning weight (WW) for biological and nurse dams by 35 and 94 g, respectively. Yet an increase in one FT enhanced (P < 0.05) litter weaning weight (LWW) for biological and nurse dams by 1.3 and 1.5 kg, respectively. Heritability estimates for TT, FT, NFT, FMG, WW, LWW, LSW, and PS were 0.25, 0.22, 0.53, 0.18, 0.21, 0.22, 0.16, and 0.18, respectively. Genetic correlation estimates between FT with TT, NFT, and FMG were 0.79, 0.09, and 0.28, respectively. Estimated genetic correlations between TT with WW, LWW, LSW, and PS were 0.37, 0.38, 0.11, and −0.19, respectively. Genetic correlation estimates between FT with WW, LWW, LSW, and PS were 0.44, 0.49, 0.39, and 0.35, respectively. Results suggest increasing functional teat number would enhance both piglet survival and reproductive throughput. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10474911 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104749112023-09-03 The impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine Obermier, Dalton R Howard, Jeremy Thomas Gray, Kent A Knauer, Mark T Transl Anim Sci Animal Genetics and Genomics The objective was to evaluate the impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine. Data included 735 multiparous Landrace × Large White F1 females. Sow underlined traits consisted of total teat number (TT), functional teat number (FT), nonfunctional teat number (NFT), and number of functional mammary glands (FMG). Weaning traits were calculated for both the biological and the nurse dam. For the biological dam, litter size at weaning (LSW) included a sow’s biological piglets regardless of cross-fostering. For nurse dam, number weaned (NW) included the piglets a sow weaned. For the biological dam, piglet survival (PS) was calculated as litter size at weaning / (total number born × 100). Linear regression estimates were calculated in RStudio v. 1.1.456 and variance components were estimated using GIBBS3F90. Average total number born, number born alive, TT, FT, NFT, and FMG were 14.22, 13.12, 14.43, 13.96, 0.42, and 10.7, respectively. An increase in one FT enhanced (P < 0.05) LSW by 0.32 piglets and NW by 0.33 piglets. Similarly, an increase in one FT improved (P < 0.05) PS by 1.63% and reduced (P < 0.05) preweaning mortality by 2.73%. However, an increase in one FT reduced (P < 0.05) average piglet weaning weight (WW) for biological and nurse dams by 35 and 94 g, respectively. Yet an increase in one FT enhanced (P < 0.05) litter weaning weight (LWW) for biological and nurse dams by 1.3 and 1.5 kg, respectively. Heritability estimates for TT, FT, NFT, FMG, WW, LWW, LSW, and PS were 0.25, 0.22, 0.53, 0.18, 0.21, 0.22, 0.16, and 0.18, respectively. Genetic correlation estimates between FT with TT, NFT, and FMG were 0.79, 0.09, and 0.28, respectively. Estimated genetic correlations between TT with WW, LWW, LSW, and PS were 0.37, 0.38, 0.11, and −0.19, respectively. Genetic correlation estimates between FT with WW, LWW, LSW, and PS were 0.44, 0.49, 0.39, and 0.35, respectively. Results suggest increasing functional teat number would enhance both piglet survival and reproductive throughput. Oxford University Press 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10474911/ /pubmed/37662897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad100 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Animal Genetics and Genomics Obermier, Dalton R Howard, Jeremy Thomas Gray, Kent A Knauer, Mark T The impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine |
title | The impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine |
title_full | The impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine |
title_fullStr | The impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine |
title_short | The impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine |
title_sort | impact of functional teat number on reproductive throughput in swine |
topic | Animal Genetics and Genomics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10474911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37662897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad100 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT obermierdaltonr theimpactoffunctionalteatnumberonreproductivethroughputinswine AT howardjeremythomas theimpactoffunctionalteatnumberonreproductivethroughputinswine AT graykenta theimpactoffunctionalteatnumberonreproductivethroughputinswine AT knauermarkt theimpactoffunctionalteatnumberonreproductivethroughputinswine AT obermierdaltonr impactoffunctionalteatnumberonreproductivethroughputinswine AT howardjeremythomas impactoffunctionalteatnumberonreproductivethroughputinswine AT graykenta impactoffunctionalteatnumberonreproductivethroughputinswine AT knauermarkt impactoffunctionalteatnumberonreproductivethroughputinswine |