Cargando…

Assessment of atmospheric emissivity models for clear-sky conditions with reanalysis data

Atmospheric longwave downward radiation (L(d)) is one of the significant components of net radiation (R(n)), and it drives several essential ecosystem processes. L(d) can be estimated with simple empirical methods using atmospheric emissivity (ε(a)) submodels. In this study, eight global models for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morales-Salinas, Luis, Ortega-Farias, Samuel, Riveros-Burgos, Camilo, Chávez, José L., Wang, Sufen, Tian, Fei, Carrasco-Benavides, Marcos, Neira-Román, José, López-Olivari, Rafael, Fuentes-Jaque, Guillermo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37660172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40499-6
_version_ 1785100642518302720
author Morales-Salinas, Luis
Ortega-Farias, Samuel
Riveros-Burgos, Camilo
Chávez, José L.
Wang, Sufen
Tian, Fei
Carrasco-Benavides, Marcos
Neira-Román, José
López-Olivari, Rafael
Fuentes-Jaque, Guillermo
author_facet Morales-Salinas, Luis
Ortega-Farias, Samuel
Riveros-Burgos, Camilo
Chávez, José L.
Wang, Sufen
Tian, Fei
Carrasco-Benavides, Marcos
Neira-Román, José
López-Olivari, Rafael
Fuentes-Jaque, Guillermo
author_sort Morales-Salinas, Luis
collection PubMed
description Atmospheric longwave downward radiation (L(d)) is one of the significant components of net radiation (R(n)), and it drives several essential ecosystem processes. L(d) can be estimated with simple empirical methods using atmospheric emissivity (ε(a)) submodels. In this study, eight global models for ε(a) were evaluated, and the best-performing model was calibrated on a global scale using a parametric instability analysis approach. The climatic data were obtained from a dynamically consistent scale resolution of basic atmospheric quantities and computed parameters known as NCEP/NCAR reanalysis (NNR) data. The performance model was evaluated with monthly average values from the NNR data. The Brutsaert equation demonstrated the best performance, and then it was calibrated. The seasonal global trend of the Brutsaert equation calibrated coefficient ranged between 1.2 and 1.4, and the K-means analysis identified five homogeneous zones (clusters) with similar behavior. Finally, the calibrated Brutsaert equation improved the R(n) estimation, with an error reduction, at the worldwide scale, of 64%. Meanwhile, the error reduction for each cluster ranged from 18 to 77%. Hence, Brutsaert’s equation coefficient should not be considered a constant value for use in ε(a) estimation, nor in time or location.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10475081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104750812023-09-04 Assessment of atmospheric emissivity models for clear-sky conditions with reanalysis data Morales-Salinas, Luis Ortega-Farias, Samuel Riveros-Burgos, Camilo Chávez, José L. Wang, Sufen Tian, Fei Carrasco-Benavides, Marcos Neira-Román, José López-Olivari, Rafael Fuentes-Jaque, Guillermo Sci Rep Article Atmospheric longwave downward radiation (L(d)) is one of the significant components of net radiation (R(n)), and it drives several essential ecosystem processes. L(d) can be estimated with simple empirical methods using atmospheric emissivity (ε(a)) submodels. In this study, eight global models for ε(a) were evaluated, and the best-performing model was calibrated on a global scale using a parametric instability analysis approach. The climatic data were obtained from a dynamically consistent scale resolution of basic atmospheric quantities and computed parameters known as NCEP/NCAR reanalysis (NNR) data. The performance model was evaluated with monthly average values from the NNR data. The Brutsaert equation demonstrated the best performance, and then it was calibrated. The seasonal global trend of the Brutsaert equation calibrated coefficient ranged between 1.2 and 1.4, and the K-means analysis identified five homogeneous zones (clusters) with similar behavior. Finally, the calibrated Brutsaert equation improved the R(n) estimation, with an error reduction, at the worldwide scale, of 64%. Meanwhile, the error reduction for each cluster ranged from 18 to 77%. Hence, Brutsaert’s equation coefficient should not be considered a constant value for use in ε(a) estimation, nor in time or location. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10475081/ /pubmed/37660172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40499-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Morales-Salinas, Luis
Ortega-Farias, Samuel
Riveros-Burgos, Camilo
Chávez, José L.
Wang, Sufen
Tian, Fei
Carrasco-Benavides, Marcos
Neira-Román, José
López-Olivari, Rafael
Fuentes-Jaque, Guillermo
Assessment of atmospheric emissivity models for clear-sky conditions with reanalysis data
title Assessment of atmospheric emissivity models for clear-sky conditions with reanalysis data
title_full Assessment of atmospheric emissivity models for clear-sky conditions with reanalysis data
title_fullStr Assessment of atmospheric emissivity models for clear-sky conditions with reanalysis data
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of atmospheric emissivity models for clear-sky conditions with reanalysis data
title_short Assessment of atmospheric emissivity models for clear-sky conditions with reanalysis data
title_sort assessment of atmospheric emissivity models for clear-sky conditions with reanalysis data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37660172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40499-6
work_keys_str_mv AT moralessalinasluis assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata
AT ortegafariassamuel assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata
AT riverosburgoscamilo assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata
AT chavezjosel assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata
AT wangsufen assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata
AT tianfei assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata
AT carrascobenavidesmarcos assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata
AT neiraromanjose assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata
AT lopezolivarirafael assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata
AT fuentesjaqueguillermo assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata