Cargando…
Assessment of atmospheric emissivity models for clear-sky conditions with reanalysis data
Atmospheric longwave downward radiation (L(d)) is one of the significant components of net radiation (R(n)), and it drives several essential ecosystem processes. L(d) can be estimated with simple empirical methods using atmospheric emissivity (ε(a)) submodels. In this study, eight global models for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37660172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40499-6 |
_version_ | 1785100642518302720 |
---|---|
author | Morales-Salinas, Luis Ortega-Farias, Samuel Riveros-Burgos, Camilo Chávez, José L. Wang, Sufen Tian, Fei Carrasco-Benavides, Marcos Neira-Román, José López-Olivari, Rafael Fuentes-Jaque, Guillermo |
author_facet | Morales-Salinas, Luis Ortega-Farias, Samuel Riveros-Burgos, Camilo Chávez, José L. Wang, Sufen Tian, Fei Carrasco-Benavides, Marcos Neira-Román, José López-Olivari, Rafael Fuentes-Jaque, Guillermo |
author_sort | Morales-Salinas, Luis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Atmospheric longwave downward radiation (L(d)) is one of the significant components of net radiation (R(n)), and it drives several essential ecosystem processes. L(d) can be estimated with simple empirical methods using atmospheric emissivity (ε(a)) submodels. In this study, eight global models for ε(a) were evaluated, and the best-performing model was calibrated on a global scale using a parametric instability analysis approach. The climatic data were obtained from a dynamically consistent scale resolution of basic atmospheric quantities and computed parameters known as NCEP/NCAR reanalysis (NNR) data. The performance model was evaluated with monthly average values from the NNR data. The Brutsaert equation demonstrated the best performance, and then it was calibrated. The seasonal global trend of the Brutsaert equation calibrated coefficient ranged between 1.2 and 1.4, and the K-means analysis identified five homogeneous zones (clusters) with similar behavior. Finally, the calibrated Brutsaert equation improved the R(n) estimation, with an error reduction, at the worldwide scale, of 64%. Meanwhile, the error reduction for each cluster ranged from 18 to 77%. Hence, Brutsaert’s equation coefficient should not be considered a constant value for use in ε(a) estimation, nor in time or location. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10475081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104750812023-09-04 Assessment of atmospheric emissivity models for clear-sky conditions with reanalysis data Morales-Salinas, Luis Ortega-Farias, Samuel Riveros-Burgos, Camilo Chávez, José L. Wang, Sufen Tian, Fei Carrasco-Benavides, Marcos Neira-Román, José López-Olivari, Rafael Fuentes-Jaque, Guillermo Sci Rep Article Atmospheric longwave downward radiation (L(d)) is one of the significant components of net radiation (R(n)), and it drives several essential ecosystem processes. L(d) can be estimated with simple empirical methods using atmospheric emissivity (ε(a)) submodels. In this study, eight global models for ε(a) were evaluated, and the best-performing model was calibrated on a global scale using a parametric instability analysis approach. The climatic data were obtained from a dynamically consistent scale resolution of basic atmospheric quantities and computed parameters known as NCEP/NCAR reanalysis (NNR) data. The performance model was evaluated with monthly average values from the NNR data. The Brutsaert equation demonstrated the best performance, and then it was calibrated. The seasonal global trend of the Brutsaert equation calibrated coefficient ranged between 1.2 and 1.4, and the K-means analysis identified five homogeneous zones (clusters) with similar behavior. Finally, the calibrated Brutsaert equation improved the R(n) estimation, with an error reduction, at the worldwide scale, of 64%. Meanwhile, the error reduction for each cluster ranged from 18 to 77%. Hence, Brutsaert’s equation coefficient should not be considered a constant value for use in ε(a) estimation, nor in time or location. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10475081/ /pubmed/37660172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40499-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Morales-Salinas, Luis Ortega-Farias, Samuel Riveros-Burgos, Camilo Chávez, José L. Wang, Sufen Tian, Fei Carrasco-Benavides, Marcos Neira-Román, José López-Olivari, Rafael Fuentes-Jaque, Guillermo Assessment of atmospheric emissivity models for clear-sky conditions with reanalysis data |
title | Assessment of atmospheric emissivity models for clear-sky conditions with reanalysis data |
title_full | Assessment of atmospheric emissivity models for clear-sky conditions with reanalysis data |
title_fullStr | Assessment of atmospheric emissivity models for clear-sky conditions with reanalysis data |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of atmospheric emissivity models for clear-sky conditions with reanalysis data |
title_short | Assessment of atmospheric emissivity models for clear-sky conditions with reanalysis data |
title_sort | assessment of atmospheric emissivity models for clear-sky conditions with reanalysis data |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37660172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40499-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moralessalinasluis assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata AT ortegafariassamuel assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata AT riverosburgoscamilo assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata AT chavezjosel assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata AT wangsufen assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata AT tianfei assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata AT carrascobenavidesmarcos assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata AT neiraromanjose assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata AT lopezolivarirafael assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata AT fuentesjaqueguillermo assessmentofatmosphericemissivitymodelsforclearskyconditionswithreanalysisdata |