Cargando…

Evaluation of Guidelines and Consensus on Ectopic Pregnancy Based by AGREE II Method

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the methodological quality of diagnosis and treatment guidelines/consensus related to ectopic pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Use the “Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation” (AGREE II) method to evaluate the differences among the guideline/consensus. RESULTS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Yiran, Zhang, Weishe, Wang, Qi, Hu, Caihong, Li, Qi, Huang, Jingrui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667774
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S421956
_version_ 1785100692719927296
author Fu, Yiran
Zhang, Weishe
Wang, Qi
Hu, Caihong
Li, Qi
Huang, Jingrui
author_facet Fu, Yiran
Zhang, Weishe
Wang, Qi
Hu, Caihong
Li, Qi
Huang, Jingrui
author_sort Fu, Yiran
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the methodological quality of diagnosis and treatment guidelines/consensus related to ectopic pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Use the “Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation” (AGREE II) method to evaluate the differences among the guideline/consensus. RESULTS: We appraised 9 clinical practice guidelines for ectopic pregnancy (9 clinical practice guidelines from 5 countries) including the United States, United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, and China. The guidelines received the highest scores for clarity of presentation (82.72%) and lowest scores for editorial independence (30.56%). The comprehensive recommendations of the 7 guidelines were Grade B, the other 2 guidelines were Grade C. CONCLUSION: The overall quality of the ectopic pregnancy guidelines had room for improvement. It is recommended to supplement and improve the four fields of “independence”, “rigor”, “participants” and “application”, especially the “independence” and “application” fields.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10475285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104752852023-09-04 Evaluation of Guidelines and Consensus on Ectopic Pregnancy Based by AGREE II Method Fu, Yiran Zhang, Weishe Wang, Qi Hu, Caihong Li, Qi Huang, Jingrui Int J Womens Health Perspectives INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the methodological quality of diagnosis and treatment guidelines/consensus related to ectopic pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Use the “Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation” (AGREE II) method to evaluate the differences among the guideline/consensus. RESULTS: We appraised 9 clinical practice guidelines for ectopic pregnancy (9 clinical practice guidelines from 5 countries) including the United States, United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, and China. The guidelines received the highest scores for clarity of presentation (82.72%) and lowest scores for editorial independence (30.56%). The comprehensive recommendations of the 7 guidelines were Grade B, the other 2 guidelines were Grade C. CONCLUSION: The overall quality of the ectopic pregnancy guidelines had room for improvement. It is recommended to supplement and improve the four fields of “independence”, “rigor”, “participants” and “application”, especially the “independence” and “application” fields. Dove 2023-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10475285/ /pubmed/37667774 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S421956 Text en © 2023 Fu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Perspectives
Fu, Yiran
Zhang, Weishe
Wang, Qi
Hu, Caihong
Li, Qi
Huang, Jingrui
Evaluation of Guidelines and Consensus on Ectopic Pregnancy Based by AGREE II Method
title Evaluation of Guidelines and Consensus on Ectopic Pregnancy Based by AGREE II Method
title_full Evaluation of Guidelines and Consensus on Ectopic Pregnancy Based by AGREE II Method
title_fullStr Evaluation of Guidelines and Consensus on Ectopic Pregnancy Based by AGREE II Method
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Guidelines and Consensus on Ectopic Pregnancy Based by AGREE II Method
title_short Evaluation of Guidelines and Consensus on Ectopic Pregnancy Based by AGREE II Method
title_sort evaluation of guidelines and consensus on ectopic pregnancy based by agree ii method
topic Perspectives
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667774
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S421956
work_keys_str_mv AT fuyiran evaluationofguidelinesandconsensusonectopicpregnancybasedbyagreeiimethod
AT zhangweishe evaluationofguidelinesandconsensusonectopicpregnancybasedbyagreeiimethod
AT wangqi evaluationofguidelinesandconsensusonectopicpregnancybasedbyagreeiimethod
AT hucaihong evaluationofguidelinesandconsensusonectopicpregnancybasedbyagreeiimethod
AT liqi evaluationofguidelinesandconsensusonectopicpregnancybasedbyagreeiimethod
AT huangjingrui evaluationofguidelinesandconsensusonectopicpregnancybasedbyagreeiimethod