Cargando…

Smoking Cessation Interventions and Abstinence Outcomes for People Living in Rural, Regional, and Remote Areas of Three High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION: Tobacco smoking rates in high-income countries are greater in rural, regional, and remote (RRR) areas compared to cities. Yet, there is limited knowledge about interventions targeted to RRR smokers. This review describes the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for RRR smok...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trigg, Joshua, Skelton, Eliza, Lum, Alistair, Guillaumier, Ashleigh, McCarter, Kristen, Handley, Tonelle, Judd, Lucy, Lye, Alexie, Bonevski, Billie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37338988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntad098
_version_ 1785100755762413568
author Trigg, Joshua
Skelton, Eliza
Lum, Alistair
Guillaumier, Ashleigh
McCarter, Kristen
Handley, Tonelle
Judd, Lucy
Lye, Alexie
Bonevski, Billie
author_facet Trigg, Joshua
Skelton, Eliza
Lum, Alistair
Guillaumier, Ashleigh
McCarter, Kristen
Handley, Tonelle
Judd, Lucy
Lye, Alexie
Bonevski, Billie
author_sort Trigg, Joshua
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Tobacco smoking rates in high-income countries are greater in rural, regional, and remote (RRR) areas compared to cities. Yet, there is limited knowledge about interventions targeted to RRR smokers. This review describes the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for RRR smokers in supporting smoking abstinence. AIMS AND METHODS: Seven academic databases were searched (inception-June 2022) for smoking cessation intervention studies to include if they reported on RRR residents of Australia, Canada, or the United States, and short- (<6 months) or long-term (≥6 months) smoking abstinence outcomes. Two researchers assessed study quality, and narratively summarized findings. RESULTS: Included studies (n = 26) were primarily randomized control (12) or pre-post (7) designs, from the United States (16) or Australia (8). Five systems change interventions were included. Interventions included cessation education or brief advice, and few included nicotine monotherapies, cessation counseling, motivational interviewing, or cognitive behavioral therapy. Interventions had limited short-term effects on RRR smoking abstinence, decreasing markedly beyond 6 months. Short-term abstinence was best supported by contingency, incentive, and online cessation interventions, and long-term abstinence by pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Cessation interventions for RRR smokers should include pharmacotherapy and psychological cessation counseling to establish short-term abstinence, and identify effective means of maintaining abstinence beyond 6 months. Contingency designs are a suitable vehicle for psychological and pharmacotherapy support for RRR people who smoke, and intervention tailoring should be explicitly considered. IMPLICATIONS: Smoking disproportionately harms RRR residents, who can encounter access barriers to smoking cessation support. High-quality intervention evidence and outcome standardization are still required to support long-term RRR smoking abstinence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10475608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104756082023-09-05 Smoking Cessation Interventions and Abstinence Outcomes for People Living in Rural, Regional, and Remote Areas of Three High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review Trigg, Joshua Skelton, Eliza Lum, Alistair Guillaumier, Ashleigh McCarter, Kristen Handley, Tonelle Judd, Lucy Lye, Alexie Bonevski, Billie Nicotine Tob Res Reviews INTRODUCTION: Tobacco smoking rates in high-income countries are greater in rural, regional, and remote (RRR) areas compared to cities. Yet, there is limited knowledge about interventions targeted to RRR smokers. This review describes the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for RRR smokers in supporting smoking abstinence. AIMS AND METHODS: Seven academic databases were searched (inception-June 2022) for smoking cessation intervention studies to include if they reported on RRR residents of Australia, Canada, or the United States, and short- (<6 months) or long-term (≥6 months) smoking abstinence outcomes. Two researchers assessed study quality, and narratively summarized findings. RESULTS: Included studies (n = 26) were primarily randomized control (12) or pre-post (7) designs, from the United States (16) or Australia (8). Five systems change interventions were included. Interventions included cessation education or brief advice, and few included nicotine monotherapies, cessation counseling, motivational interviewing, or cognitive behavioral therapy. Interventions had limited short-term effects on RRR smoking abstinence, decreasing markedly beyond 6 months. Short-term abstinence was best supported by contingency, incentive, and online cessation interventions, and long-term abstinence by pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Cessation interventions for RRR smokers should include pharmacotherapy and psychological cessation counseling to establish short-term abstinence, and identify effective means of maintaining abstinence beyond 6 months. Contingency designs are a suitable vehicle for psychological and pharmacotherapy support for RRR people who smoke, and intervention tailoring should be explicitly considered. IMPLICATIONS: Smoking disproportionately harms RRR residents, who can encounter access barriers to smoking cessation support. High-quality intervention evidence and outcome standardization are still required to support long-term RRR smoking abstinence. Oxford University Press 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10475608/ /pubmed/37338988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntad098 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Trigg, Joshua
Skelton, Eliza
Lum, Alistair
Guillaumier, Ashleigh
McCarter, Kristen
Handley, Tonelle
Judd, Lucy
Lye, Alexie
Bonevski, Billie
Smoking Cessation Interventions and Abstinence Outcomes for People Living in Rural, Regional, and Remote Areas of Three High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review
title Smoking Cessation Interventions and Abstinence Outcomes for People Living in Rural, Regional, and Remote Areas of Three High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review
title_full Smoking Cessation Interventions and Abstinence Outcomes for People Living in Rural, Regional, and Remote Areas of Three High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Smoking Cessation Interventions and Abstinence Outcomes for People Living in Rural, Regional, and Remote Areas of Three High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Smoking Cessation Interventions and Abstinence Outcomes for People Living in Rural, Regional, and Remote Areas of Three High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review
title_short Smoking Cessation Interventions and Abstinence Outcomes for People Living in Rural, Regional, and Remote Areas of Three High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review
title_sort smoking cessation interventions and abstinence outcomes for people living in rural, regional, and remote areas of three high-income countries: a systematic review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37338988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntad098
work_keys_str_mv AT triggjoshua smokingcessationinterventionsandabstinenceoutcomesforpeoplelivinginruralregionalandremoteareasofthreehighincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT skeltoneliza smokingcessationinterventionsandabstinenceoutcomesforpeoplelivinginruralregionalandremoteareasofthreehighincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT lumalistair smokingcessationinterventionsandabstinenceoutcomesforpeoplelivinginruralregionalandremoteareasofthreehighincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT guillaumierashleigh smokingcessationinterventionsandabstinenceoutcomesforpeoplelivinginruralregionalandremoteareasofthreehighincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT mccarterkristen smokingcessationinterventionsandabstinenceoutcomesforpeoplelivinginruralregionalandremoteareasofthreehighincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT handleytonelle smokingcessationinterventionsandabstinenceoutcomesforpeoplelivinginruralregionalandremoteareasofthreehighincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT juddlucy smokingcessationinterventionsandabstinenceoutcomesforpeoplelivinginruralregionalandremoteareasofthreehighincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT lyealexie smokingcessationinterventionsandabstinenceoutcomesforpeoplelivinginruralregionalandremoteareasofthreehighincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT bonevskibillie smokingcessationinterventionsandabstinenceoutcomesforpeoplelivinginruralregionalandremoteareasofthreehighincomecountriesasystematicreview