Cargando…

International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment

PURPOSE: Rectal cancer treatment has a wide range of possible approaches from radical extirpative surgery to nonoperative watchful waiting following chemoradiotherapy, with or without, additional chemotherapy. Our goal was to assess the personal opinion of active practicing surgeons on rectal cancer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dulskas, Audrius, Caushaj, Philip F., Grigoravicius, Domas, Zheng, Liu, Fortunato, Richard, Nunoo-Mensah, Joseph W., Samalavicius, Narimantas E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Coloproctology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36217808
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00255.0036
_version_ 1785100793907511296
author Dulskas, Audrius
Caushaj, Philip F.
Grigoravicius, Domas
Zheng, Liu
Fortunato, Richard
Nunoo-Mensah, Joseph W.
Samalavicius, Narimantas E.
author_facet Dulskas, Audrius
Caushaj, Philip F.
Grigoravicius, Domas
Zheng, Liu
Fortunato, Richard
Nunoo-Mensah, Joseph W.
Samalavicius, Narimantas E.
author_sort Dulskas, Audrius
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Rectal cancer treatment has a wide range of possible approaches from radical extirpative surgery to nonoperative watchful waiting following chemoradiotherapy, with or without, additional chemotherapy. Our goal was to assess the personal opinion of active practicing surgeons on rectal cancer treatment if he/she was the patient. METHODS: A panel of the International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ISUCRS) selected 10 questions that were included in a questionnaire that included other items including demographics. The questionnaire was distributed electronically to ISUCRS fellows and other surgeons included in our database and remained open from April 16 to 28, 2020. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-three specialists completed the survey. The majority of surgeons (n=65, 39.9%) chose the minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery for their personal treatment of rectal cancer. For low-lying rectal cancer T1 and T2, the treatment choice was standard chemoradiation+local excision (n=60, 36.8%) followed by local excision±chemoradiotherapy if needed (n=55, 33.7%). In regards to locally advanced low rectal cancer T3 or greater, the preference of the responders was for laparoscopic surgery (n=65, 39.9%). We found a statistically significant relationship between surgeons’ age and their preference for minimally invasive techniques demonstrating an age-based bias on senior surgeons’ inclination toward open approach. CONCLUSION: Our survey reveals an age-based preference by surgeons for minimally invasive surgical techniques as well as organ-preserving techniques for personal treatment of treating rectal cancer. Only 1/4 of specialists do adhere to the international guidelines for treating early rectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10475796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Society of Coloproctology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104757962023-09-05 International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment Dulskas, Audrius Caushaj, Philip F. Grigoravicius, Domas Zheng, Liu Fortunato, Richard Nunoo-Mensah, Joseph W. Samalavicius, Narimantas E. Ann Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: Rectal cancer treatment has a wide range of possible approaches from radical extirpative surgery to nonoperative watchful waiting following chemoradiotherapy, with or without, additional chemotherapy. Our goal was to assess the personal opinion of active practicing surgeons on rectal cancer treatment if he/she was the patient. METHODS: A panel of the International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ISUCRS) selected 10 questions that were included in a questionnaire that included other items including demographics. The questionnaire was distributed electronically to ISUCRS fellows and other surgeons included in our database and remained open from April 16 to 28, 2020. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-three specialists completed the survey. The majority of surgeons (n=65, 39.9%) chose the minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery for their personal treatment of rectal cancer. For low-lying rectal cancer T1 and T2, the treatment choice was standard chemoradiation+local excision (n=60, 36.8%) followed by local excision±chemoradiotherapy if needed (n=55, 33.7%). In regards to locally advanced low rectal cancer T3 or greater, the preference of the responders was for laparoscopic surgery (n=65, 39.9%). We found a statistically significant relationship between surgeons’ age and their preference for minimally invasive techniques demonstrating an age-based bias on senior surgeons’ inclination toward open approach. CONCLUSION: Our survey reveals an age-based preference by surgeons for minimally invasive surgical techniques as well as organ-preserving techniques for personal treatment of treating rectal cancer. Only 1/4 of specialists do adhere to the international guidelines for treating early rectal cancer. Korean Society of Coloproctology 2023-08 2022-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10475796/ /pubmed/36217808 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00255.0036 Text en © 2023 Korean Society of Coloproctology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dulskas, Audrius
Caushaj, Philip F.
Grigoravicius, Domas
Zheng, Liu
Fortunato, Richard
Nunoo-Mensah, Joseph W.
Samalavicius, Narimantas E.
International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment
title International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment
title_full International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment
title_fullStr International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment
title_full_unstemmed International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment
title_short International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment
title_sort international society of university colon and rectal surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36217808
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00255.0036
work_keys_str_mv AT dulskasaudrius internationalsocietyofuniversitycolonandrectalsurgeonssurveyofsurgeonspreferenceonrectalcancertreatment
AT caushajphilipf internationalsocietyofuniversitycolonandrectalsurgeonssurveyofsurgeonspreferenceonrectalcancertreatment
AT grigoraviciusdomas internationalsocietyofuniversitycolonandrectalsurgeonssurveyofsurgeonspreferenceonrectalcancertreatment
AT zhengliu internationalsocietyofuniversitycolonandrectalsurgeonssurveyofsurgeonspreferenceonrectalcancertreatment
AT fortunatorichard internationalsocietyofuniversitycolonandrectalsurgeonssurveyofsurgeonspreferenceonrectalcancertreatment
AT nunoomensahjosephw internationalsocietyofuniversitycolonandrectalsurgeonssurveyofsurgeonspreferenceonrectalcancertreatment
AT samalaviciusnarimantase internationalsocietyofuniversitycolonandrectalsurgeonssurveyofsurgeonspreferenceonrectalcancertreatment