Cargando…
Diet composition and energy intake in humans
Absolute energy from fats and carbohydrates and the proportion of carbohydrates in the food supply have increased over 50 years. Dietary energy density (ED) is primarily decreased by the water and increased by the fat content of foods. Protein, carbohydrates and fat exert different effects on satiet...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37661746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0449 |
_version_ | 1785100810731913216 |
---|---|
author | James Stubbs, R. Horgan, Graham Robinson, Eric Hopkins, Mark Dakin, Clarissa Finlayson, Graham |
author_facet | James Stubbs, R. Horgan, Graham Robinson, Eric Hopkins, Mark Dakin, Clarissa Finlayson, Graham |
author_sort | James Stubbs, R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Absolute energy from fats and carbohydrates and the proportion of carbohydrates in the food supply have increased over 50 years. Dietary energy density (ED) is primarily decreased by the water and increased by the fat content of foods. Protein, carbohydrates and fat exert different effects on satiety or energy intake (EI) in the order protein > carbohydrates > fat. When the ED of different foods is equalized the differences between fat and carbohydrates are modest. Covertly increasing dietary ED with fat, carbohydrate or mixed macronutrients elevates EI, producing weight gain and vice versa. In more naturalistic situations where learning cues are intact, there appears to be greater compensation for the different ED of foods. There is considerable individual variability in response. Macronutrient-specific negative feedback models of EI regulation have limited capacity to explain how availability of cheap, highly palatable, readily assimilated, energy-dense foods lead to obesity in modern environments. Neuropsychological constructs including food reward (liking, wanting and learning), reactive and reflective decision making, in the context of asymmetric energy balance regulation, give more comprehensive explanations of how environmental superabundance of foods containing mixtures of readily assimilated fats and carbohydrates and caloric beverages elevate EI through combined hedonic, affective, cognitive and physiological mechanisms. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Causes of obesity: theories, conjectures and evidence (Part II)’. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10475874 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104758742023-09-05 Diet composition and energy intake in humans James Stubbs, R. Horgan, Graham Robinson, Eric Hopkins, Mark Dakin, Clarissa Finlayson, Graham Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles Absolute energy from fats and carbohydrates and the proportion of carbohydrates in the food supply have increased over 50 years. Dietary energy density (ED) is primarily decreased by the water and increased by the fat content of foods. Protein, carbohydrates and fat exert different effects on satiety or energy intake (EI) in the order protein > carbohydrates > fat. When the ED of different foods is equalized the differences between fat and carbohydrates are modest. Covertly increasing dietary ED with fat, carbohydrate or mixed macronutrients elevates EI, producing weight gain and vice versa. In more naturalistic situations where learning cues are intact, there appears to be greater compensation for the different ED of foods. There is considerable individual variability in response. Macronutrient-specific negative feedback models of EI regulation have limited capacity to explain how availability of cheap, highly palatable, readily assimilated, energy-dense foods lead to obesity in modern environments. Neuropsychological constructs including food reward (liking, wanting and learning), reactive and reflective decision making, in the context of asymmetric energy balance regulation, give more comprehensive explanations of how environmental superabundance of foods containing mixtures of readily assimilated fats and carbohydrates and caloric beverages elevate EI through combined hedonic, affective, cognitive and physiological mechanisms. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Causes of obesity: theories, conjectures and evidence (Part II)’. The Royal Society 2023-10-23 2023-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10475874/ /pubmed/37661746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0449 Text en © 2023 The Author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Articles James Stubbs, R. Horgan, Graham Robinson, Eric Hopkins, Mark Dakin, Clarissa Finlayson, Graham Diet composition and energy intake in humans |
title | Diet composition and energy intake in humans |
title_full | Diet composition and energy intake in humans |
title_fullStr | Diet composition and energy intake in humans |
title_full_unstemmed | Diet composition and energy intake in humans |
title_short | Diet composition and energy intake in humans |
title_sort | diet composition and energy intake in humans |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37661746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0449 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jamesstubbsr dietcompositionandenergyintakeinhumans AT horgangraham dietcompositionandenergyintakeinhumans AT robinsoneric dietcompositionandenergyintakeinhumans AT hopkinsmark dietcompositionandenergyintakeinhumans AT dakinclarissa dietcompositionandenergyintakeinhumans AT finlaysongraham dietcompositionandenergyintakeinhumans |