Cargando…

Diet composition and energy intake in humans

Absolute energy from fats and carbohydrates and the proportion of carbohydrates in the food supply have increased over 50 years. Dietary energy density (ED) is primarily decreased by the water and increased by the fat content of foods. Protein, carbohydrates and fat exert different effects on satiet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: James Stubbs, R., Horgan, Graham, Robinson, Eric, Hopkins, Mark, Dakin, Clarissa, Finlayson, Graham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37661746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0449
_version_ 1785100810731913216
author James Stubbs, R.
Horgan, Graham
Robinson, Eric
Hopkins, Mark
Dakin, Clarissa
Finlayson, Graham
author_facet James Stubbs, R.
Horgan, Graham
Robinson, Eric
Hopkins, Mark
Dakin, Clarissa
Finlayson, Graham
author_sort James Stubbs, R.
collection PubMed
description Absolute energy from fats and carbohydrates and the proportion of carbohydrates in the food supply have increased over 50 years. Dietary energy density (ED) is primarily decreased by the water and increased by the fat content of foods. Protein, carbohydrates and fat exert different effects on satiety or energy intake (EI) in the order protein > carbohydrates > fat. When the ED of different foods is equalized the differences between fat and carbohydrates are modest. Covertly increasing dietary ED with fat, carbohydrate or mixed macronutrients elevates EI, producing weight gain and vice versa. In more naturalistic situations where learning cues are intact, there appears to be greater compensation for the different ED of foods. There is considerable individual variability in response. Macronutrient-specific negative feedback models of EI regulation have limited capacity to explain how availability of cheap, highly palatable, readily assimilated, energy-dense foods lead to obesity in modern environments. Neuropsychological constructs including food reward (liking, wanting and learning), reactive and reflective decision making, in the context of asymmetric energy balance regulation, give more comprehensive explanations of how environmental superabundance of foods containing mixtures of readily assimilated fats and carbohydrates and caloric beverages elevate EI through combined hedonic, affective, cognitive and physiological mechanisms. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Causes of obesity: theories, conjectures and evidence (Part II)’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10475874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104758742023-09-05 Diet composition and energy intake in humans James Stubbs, R. Horgan, Graham Robinson, Eric Hopkins, Mark Dakin, Clarissa Finlayson, Graham Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles Absolute energy from fats and carbohydrates and the proportion of carbohydrates in the food supply have increased over 50 years. Dietary energy density (ED) is primarily decreased by the water and increased by the fat content of foods. Protein, carbohydrates and fat exert different effects on satiety or energy intake (EI) in the order protein > carbohydrates > fat. When the ED of different foods is equalized the differences between fat and carbohydrates are modest. Covertly increasing dietary ED with fat, carbohydrate or mixed macronutrients elevates EI, producing weight gain and vice versa. In more naturalistic situations where learning cues are intact, there appears to be greater compensation for the different ED of foods. There is considerable individual variability in response. Macronutrient-specific negative feedback models of EI regulation have limited capacity to explain how availability of cheap, highly palatable, readily assimilated, energy-dense foods lead to obesity in modern environments. Neuropsychological constructs including food reward (liking, wanting and learning), reactive and reflective decision making, in the context of asymmetric energy balance regulation, give more comprehensive explanations of how environmental superabundance of foods containing mixtures of readily assimilated fats and carbohydrates and caloric beverages elevate EI through combined hedonic, affective, cognitive and physiological mechanisms. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Causes of obesity: theories, conjectures and evidence (Part II)’. The Royal Society 2023-10-23 2023-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10475874/ /pubmed/37661746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0449 Text en © 2023 The Author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
James Stubbs, R.
Horgan, Graham
Robinson, Eric
Hopkins, Mark
Dakin, Clarissa
Finlayson, Graham
Diet composition and energy intake in humans
title Diet composition and energy intake in humans
title_full Diet composition and energy intake in humans
title_fullStr Diet composition and energy intake in humans
title_full_unstemmed Diet composition and energy intake in humans
title_short Diet composition and energy intake in humans
title_sort diet composition and energy intake in humans
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37661746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0449
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesstubbsr dietcompositionandenergyintakeinhumans
AT horgangraham dietcompositionandenergyintakeinhumans
AT robinsoneric dietcompositionandenergyintakeinhumans
AT hopkinsmark dietcompositionandenergyintakeinhumans
AT dakinclarissa dietcompositionandenergyintakeinhumans
AT finlaysongraham dietcompositionandenergyintakeinhumans