Cargando…

Ultrasound‐guided pacemaker implantation at the bedside: A lifesaving technique for cardiac emergencies

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of implanting temporary pacemakers using ultrasound‐guidance at the bedside for rescuing patients in case of cardiac emergencies. METHODS: We enrolled 194 patients with cardiac emergencies requiring temporary pacemakers in this study, and random...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Rong‐Quan, Huang, Xiao‐Feng, Guo, Ping‐Qing, Cai, Hong‐Bin, Feng, Shao‐Dan, Lin, Zhi‐Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.13071
_version_ 1785100812458917888
author Xu, Rong‐Quan
Huang, Xiao‐Feng
Guo, Ping‐Qing
Cai, Hong‐Bin
Feng, Shao‐Dan
Lin, Zhi‐Hong
author_facet Xu, Rong‐Quan
Huang, Xiao‐Feng
Guo, Ping‐Qing
Cai, Hong‐Bin
Feng, Shao‐Dan
Lin, Zhi‐Hong
author_sort Xu, Rong‐Quan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of implanting temporary pacemakers using ultrasound‐guidance at the bedside for rescuing patients in case of cardiac emergencies. METHODS: We enrolled 194 patients with cardiac emergencies requiring temporary pacemakers in this study, and randomly assigned them to either a bedside ultrasound‐guided installation group or an electrocardiogram‐guided installation group. There were 105 cases in the bedside ultrasound‐guided installation group, aged approximately 66.3 ± 10.2 years, and 89 cases in the electrocardiogram‐guided installation group, aged approximately 65.8 ± 9.5 years old, and disease composition was similar between the two groups. We then compared the duration of the procedure, success rates, and occurrence of adverse events between the two groups. RESULTS: The two groups showed similar clinical characteristics. The success rates of venipuncture and temporary pacemaker electrode placement were both 100% in the bedside ultrasound‐guided installation group, compared to 87.8% and 96.7% respectively, in the electrocardiogram‐guided installation group, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups. The duration of puncture was significantly shorter in the bedside ultrasound‐guided installation group than in the electrocardiogram‐guided installation group, with statistically significant differences. Moreover, no adverse events such as hematoma, pneumothorax and electrode dislodgement occurred in the bedside ultrasound‐guided installation group, while 13 cases in the electrocardiogram‐guided installation group experienced adverse events, and the difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The bedside installation of temporary pacemakers using ultrasound guidance is a simple, safe, effective, and cost‐efficient procedure that boasts a high success rate, does not involve radiation, and enables accurate placement of the electrode catheter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10475883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104758832023-09-05 Ultrasound‐guided pacemaker implantation at the bedside: A lifesaving technique for cardiac emergencies Xu, Rong‐Quan Huang, Xiao‐Feng Guo, Ping‐Qing Cai, Hong‐Bin Feng, Shao‐Dan Lin, Zhi‐Hong Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of implanting temporary pacemakers using ultrasound‐guidance at the bedside for rescuing patients in case of cardiac emergencies. METHODS: We enrolled 194 patients with cardiac emergencies requiring temporary pacemakers in this study, and randomly assigned them to either a bedside ultrasound‐guided installation group or an electrocardiogram‐guided installation group. There were 105 cases in the bedside ultrasound‐guided installation group, aged approximately 66.3 ± 10.2 years, and 89 cases in the electrocardiogram‐guided installation group, aged approximately 65.8 ± 9.5 years old, and disease composition was similar between the two groups. We then compared the duration of the procedure, success rates, and occurrence of adverse events between the two groups. RESULTS: The two groups showed similar clinical characteristics. The success rates of venipuncture and temporary pacemaker electrode placement were both 100% in the bedside ultrasound‐guided installation group, compared to 87.8% and 96.7% respectively, in the electrocardiogram‐guided installation group, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups. The duration of puncture was significantly shorter in the bedside ultrasound‐guided installation group than in the electrocardiogram‐guided installation group, with statistically significant differences. Moreover, no adverse events such as hematoma, pneumothorax and electrode dislodgement occurred in the bedside ultrasound‐guided installation group, while 13 cases in the electrocardiogram‐guided installation group experienced adverse events, and the difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The bedside installation of temporary pacemakers using ultrasound guidance is a simple, safe, effective, and cost‐efficient procedure that boasts a high success rate, does not involve radiation, and enables accurate placement of the electrode catheter. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10475883/ /pubmed/37469208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.13071 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Xu, Rong‐Quan
Huang, Xiao‐Feng
Guo, Ping‐Qing
Cai, Hong‐Bin
Feng, Shao‐Dan
Lin, Zhi‐Hong
Ultrasound‐guided pacemaker implantation at the bedside: A lifesaving technique for cardiac emergencies
title Ultrasound‐guided pacemaker implantation at the bedside: A lifesaving technique for cardiac emergencies
title_full Ultrasound‐guided pacemaker implantation at the bedside: A lifesaving technique for cardiac emergencies
title_fullStr Ultrasound‐guided pacemaker implantation at the bedside: A lifesaving technique for cardiac emergencies
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound‐guided pacemaker implantation at the bedside: A lifesaving technique for cardiac emergencies
title_short Ultrasound‐guided pacemaker implantation at the bedside: A lifesaving technique for cardiac emergencies
title_sort ultrasound‐guided pacemaker implantation at the bedside: a lifesaving technique for cardiac emergencies
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.13071
work_keys_str_mv AT xurongquan ultrasoundguidedpacemakerimplantationatthebedsidealifesavingtechniqueforcardiacemergencies
AT huangxiaofeng ultrasoundguidedpacemakerimplantationatthebedsidealifesavingtechniqueforcardiacemergencies
AT guopingqing ultrasoundguidedpacemakerimplantationatthebedsidealifesavingtechniqueforcardiacemergencies
AT caihongbin ultrasoundguidedpacemakerimplantationatthebedsidealifesavingtechniqueforcardiacemergencies
AT fengshaodan ultrasoundguidedpacemakerimplantationatthebedsidealifesavingtechniqueforcardiacemergencies
AT linzhihong ultrasoundguidedpacemakerimplantationatthebedsidealifesavingtechniqueforcardiacemergencies