Cargando…

Cytological DNA methylation for cervical cancer screening: a validation set

BACKGROUND: In a previous training set with a case-controlled design, cutoff values for host EPB41L3 and JAM3 gene methylation were obtained for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or more severe lesions (CIN2+). This validation trial was conducted to evaluate the role of DNA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kong, Linghua, Wang, Linhai, Wang, Ziyun, Xiao, Xiaoping, You, Yan, Wu, Huanwen, Wu, Ming, Liu, Pei, Li, Lei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37671063
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1181982
_version_ 1785100822039756800
author Kong, Linghua
Wang, Linhai
Wang, Ziyun
Xiao, Xiaoping
You, Yan
Wu, Huanwen
Wu, Ming
Liu, Pei
Li, Lei
author_facet Kong, Linghua
Wang, Linhai
Wang, Ziyun
Xiao, Xiaoping
You, Yan
Wu, Huanwen
Wu, Ming
Liu, Pei
Li, Lei
author_sort Kong, Linghua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In a previous training set with a case-controlled design, cutoff values for host EPB41L3 and JAM3 gene methylation were obtained for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or more severe lesions (CIN2+). This validation trial was conducted to evaluate the role of DNA methylation in screening for CIN2+ by cervical cytology among unselected participants. METHODS: From June 1, 2019, to September 1, 2019, in our study center, we collected liquid-based samples from cervical swabs for methylation assays and hrHPV testing in eligible patients. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation and hrHPV genotyping for CIN2+ according to confirmed histology results. RESULTS: Among 307 participants, compared with hrHPV testing, the methylation assay for CIN2+ had lower sensitivity (68.7% versus 86.1%, p=0.002) but higher specificity (96.7% versus 0.696, p<0.001). The methylation assay also had favorable sensitivity and specificity in patients with negative hrHPV testing (56.3% and 96.9%) and in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma (73.7% and 92.7%). DNA methylation had higher specificity than the hrHPV assay (100.0% versus 44.4%, p<0.001) for identifying residual CIN2+ in patients without residual lesions. Positive cervical DNA methylation was associated with a diagnostic probability of endometrial carcinoma (odds ratio 15.5 [95% confidence interval 4.1-58.6]) but not of ovarian epithelial carcinoma (1.4 [0.3-6.5]). CONCLUSIONS: The host EPB41L3 and JAM3 gene methylation assay in cervical cytology had favorable diagnostic accuracy for CIN2+ and was highly specific for residual CIN2+ lesions The methylation assay is a promising triage tool in hrHPV+ women, or even an independent tool for cervical cancer screening. The methylation status in cervical cytology could also serve as a prognostic biomarker. Its role in detecting endometrial carcinomas is worthy of further exploration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10475939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104759392023-09-05 Cytological DNA methylation for cervical cancer screening: a validation set Kong, Linghua Wang, Linhai Wang, Ziyun Xiao, Xiaoping You, Yan Wu, Huanwen Wu, Ming Liu, Pei Li, Lei Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: In a previous training set with a case-controlled design, cutoff values for host EPB41L3 and JAM3 gene methylation were obtained for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or more severe lesions (CIN2+). This validation trial was conducted to evaluate the role of DNA methylation in screening for CIN2+ by cervical cytology among unselected participants. METHODS: From June 1, 2019, to September 1, 2019, in our study center, we collected liquid-based samples from cervical swabs for methylation assays and hrHPV testing in eligible patients. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation and hrHPV genotyping for CIN2+ according to confirmed histology results. RESULTS: Among 307 participants, compared with hrHPV testing, the methylation assay for CIN2+ had lower sensitivity (68.7% versus 86.1%, p=0.002) but higher specificity (96.7% versus 0.696, p<0.001). The methylation assay also had favorable sensitivity and specificity in patients with negative hrHPV testing (56.3% and 96.9%) and in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma (73.7% and 92.7%). DNA methylation had higher specificity than the hrHPV assay (100.0% versus 44.4%, p<0.001) for identifying residual CIN2+ in patients without residual lesions. Positive cervical DNA methylation was associated with a diagnostic probability of endometrial carcinoma (odds ratio 15.5 [95% confidence interval 4.1-58.6]) but not of ovarian epithelial carcinoma (1.4 [0.3-6.5]). CONCLUSIONS: The host EPB41L3 and JAM3 gene methylation assay in cervical cytology had favorable diagnostic accuracy for CIN2+ and was highly specific for residual CIN2+ lesions The methylation assay is a promising triage tool in hrHPV+ women, or even an independent tool for cervical cancer screening. The methylation status in cervical cytology could also serve as a prognostic biomarker. Its role in detecting endometrial carcinomas is worthy of further exploration. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10475939/ /pubmed/37671063 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1181982 Text en Copyright © 2023 Kong, Wang, Wang, Xiao, You, Wu, Wu, Liu and Li https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Kong, Linghua
Wang, Linhai
Wang, Ziyun
Xiao, Xiaoping
You, Yan
Wu, Huanwen
Wu, Ming
Liu, Pei
Li, Lei
Cytological DNA methylation for cervical cancer screening: a validation set
title Cytological DNA methylation for cervical cancer screening: a validation set
title_full Cytological DNA methylation for cervical cancer screening: a validation set
title_fullStr Cytological DNA methylation for cervical cancer screening: a validation set
title_full_unstemmed Cytological DNA methylation for cervical cancer screening: a validation set
title_short Cytological DNA methylation for cervical cancer screening: a validation set
title_sort cytological dna methylation for cervical cancer screening: a validation set
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37671063
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1181982
work_keys_str_mv AT konglinghua cytologicaldnamethylationforcervicalcancerscreeningavalidationset
AT wanglinhai cytologicaldnamethylationforcervicalcancerscreeningavalidationset
AT wangziyun cytologicaldnamethylationforcervicalcancerscreeningavalidationset
AT xiaoxiaoping cytologicaldnamethylationforcervicalcancerscreeningavalidationset
AT youyan cytologicaldnamethylationforcervicalcancerscreeningavalidationset
AT wuhuanwen cytologicaldnamethylationforcervicalcancerscreeningavalidationset
AT wuming cytologicaldnamethylationforcervicalcancerscreeningavalidationset
AT liupei cytologicaldnamethylationforcervicalcancerscreeningavalidationset
AT lilei cytologicaldnamethylationforcervicalcancerscreeningavalidationset