Cargando…
Clinical trials in cancer screening, prevention and early diagnosis (SPED): a systematic mapping review
BACKGROUND: Global annual cancer incidence is forecast to rise to 27.5 M by 2040, a 62% increase from 2018. For most cancers, prevention and early detection are the most effective ways of reducing mortality. This study maps trials in cancer screening, prevention, and early diagnosis (SPED) to identi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11300-8 |
_version_ | 1785100898864726016 |
---|---|
author | O’Dowd, Emma L. Merriel, Samuel W. D. Cheng, Vinton W. T. Khan, Sam Howells, Lynne M. Gopal, Dipesh P. Roundhill, Elizabeth A. Brennan, Paul M. Crosbie, Philip A. J. Neal, Richard D. Brown, Karen Crosbie, Emma J. Baldwin, David R. |
author_facet | O’Dowd, Emma L. Merriel, Samuel W. D. Cheng, Vinton W. T. Khan, Sam Howells, Lynne M. Gopal, Dipesh P. Roundhill, Elizabeth A. Brennan, Paul M. Crosbie, Philip A. J. Neal, Richard D. Brown, Karen Crosbie, Emma J. Baldwin, David R. |
author_sort | O’Dowd, Emma L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Global annual cancer incidence is forecast to rise to 27.5 M by 2040, a 62% increase from 2018. For most cancers, prevention and early detection are the most effective ways of reducing mortality. This study maps trials in cancer screening, prevention, and early diagnosis (SPED) to identify areas of unmet need and highlight research priorities. METHODS: A systematic mapping review was conducted to evaluate all clinical trials focused on cancer SPED, irrespective of tumour type. The National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) portfolio, EMBASE, PubMed and Medline were searched for relevant papers published between 01/01/2007 and 01/04/2020. References were exported into Covidence software and double-screened. Data were extracted and mapped according to tumour site, geographical location, and intervention type. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen thousand seven hundred one abstracts were screened, 5157 full texts reviewed, and 2888 studies included. 1184 (52%) trials focussed on screening, 554 (24%) prevention, 442 (20%) early diagnosis, and 85 (4%) a combination. Colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer comprised 61% of all studies compared with 6.4% in lung and 1.8% in liver cancer. The latter two are responsible for 26.3% of global cancer deaths compared with 19.3% for the former three. Number of studies varied markedly according to geographical location; 88% were based in North America, Europe, or Asia. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows clear disparities in the volume of research conducted across different tumour types and according to geographical location. These findings will help drive future research effort so that resources can be directed towards major challenges in cancer SPED. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-023-11300-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10476302 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104763022023-09-05 Clinical trials in cancer screening, prevention and early diagnosis (SPED): a systematic mapping review O’Dowd, Emma L. Merriel, Samuel W. D. Cheng, Vinton W. T. Khan, Sam Howells, Lynne M. Gopal, Dipesh P. Roundhill, Elizabeth A. Brennan, Paul M. Crosbie, Philip A. J. Neal, Richard D. Brown, Karen Crosbie, Emma J. Baldwin, David R. BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Global annual cancer incidence is forecast to rise to 27.5 M by 2040, a 62% increase from 2018. For most cancers, prevention and early detection are the most effective ways of reducing mortality. This study maps trials in cancer screening, prevention, and early diagnosis (SPED) to identify areas of unmet need and highlight research priorities. METHODS: A systematic mapping review was conducted to evaluate all clinical trials focused on cancer SPED, irrespective of tumour type. The National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) portfolio, EMBASE, PubMed and Medline were searched for relevant papers published between 01/01/2007 and 01/04/2020. References were exported into Covidence software and double-screened. Data were extracted and mapped according to tumour site, geographical location, and intervention type. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen thousand seven hundred one abstracts were screened, 5157 full texts reviewed, and 2888 studies included. 1184 (52%) trials focussed on screening, 554 (24%) prevention, 442 (20%) early diagnosis, and 85 (4%) a combination. Colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer comprised 61% of all studies compared with 6.4% in lung and 1.8% in liver cancer. The latter two are responsible for 26.3% of global cancer deaths compared with 19.3% for the former three. Number of studies varied markedly according to geographical location; 88% were based in North America, Europe, or Asia. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows clear disparities in the volume of research conducted across different tumour types and according to geographical location. These findings will help drive future research effort so that resources can be directed towards major challenges in cancer SPED. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-023-11300-8. BioMed Central 2023-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10476302/ /pubmed/37667231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11300-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research O’Dowd, Emma L. Merriel, Samuel W. D. Cheng, Vinton W. T. Khan, Sam Howells, Lynne M. Gopal, Dipesh P. Roundhill, Elizabeth A. Brennan, Paul M. Crosbie, Philip A. J. Neal, Richard D. Brown, Karen Crosbie, Emma J. Baldwin, David R. Clinical trials in cancer screening, prevention and early diagnosis (SPED): a systematic mapping review |
title | Clinical trials in cancer screening, prevention and early diagnosis (SPED): a systematic mapping review |
title_full | Clinical trials in cancer screening, prevention and early diagnosis (SPED): a systematic mapping review |
title_fullStr | Clinical trials in cancer screening, prevention and early diagnosis (SPED): a systematic mapping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical trials in cancer screening, prevention and early diagnosis (SPED): a systematic mapping review |
title_short | Clinical trials in cancer screening, prevention and early diagnosis (SPED): a systematic mapping review |
title_sort | clinical trials in cancer screening, prevention and early diagnosis (sped): a systematic mapping review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11300-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT odowdemmal clinicaltrialsincancerscreeningpreventionandearlydiagnosisspedasystematicmappingreview AT merrielsamuelwd clinicaltrialsincancerscreeningpreventionandearlydiagnosisspedasystematicmappingreview AT chengvintonwt clinicaltrialsincancerscreeningpreventionandearlydiagnosisspedasystematicmappingreview AT khansam clinicaltrialsincancerscreeningpreventionandearlydiagnosisspedasystematicmappingreview AT howellslynnem clinicaltrialsincancerscreeningpreventionandearlydiagnosisspedasystematicmappingreview AT gopaldipeshp clinicaltrialsincancerscreeningpreventionandearlydiagnosisspedasystematicmappingreview AT roundhillelizabetha clinicaltrialsincancerscreeningpreventionandearlydiagnosisspedasystematicmappingreview AT brennanpaulm clinicaltrialsincancerscreeningpreventionandearlydiagnosisspedasystematicmappingreview AT crosbiephilipaj clinicaltrialsincancerscreeningpreventionandearlydiagnosisspedasystematicmappingreview AT nealrichardd clinicaltrialsincancerscreeningpreventionandearlydiagnosisspedasystematicmappingreview AT brownkaren clinicaltrialsincancerscreeningpreventionandearlydiagnosisspedasystematicmappingreview AT crosbieemmaj clinicaltrialsincancerscreeningpreventionandearlydiagnosisspedasystematicmappingreview AT baldwindavidr clinicaltrialsincancerscreeningpreventionandearlydiagnosisspedasystematicmappingreview |