Cargando…

Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-TLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Hao, Song, Yifan, Li, Yiming, Zhou, Hengcai, Fu, Yufei, Li, Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04138-0
_version_ 1785100900322246656
author Han, Hao
Song, Yifan
Li, Yiming
Zhou, Hengcai
Fu, Yufei
Li, Jie
author_facet Han, Hao
Song, Yifan
Li, Yiming
Zhou, Hengcai
Fu, Yufei
Li, Jie
author_sort Han, Hao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-TLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases by meta-analysis. METHODS: A computer-based search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) was conducted from the inception of the each database to April 2023. The searched literature was then screened according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The critical data were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager software5.4.1. Pooled effects were calculated on the basis of data attributes by mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies and 949 patients met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis, 445 in the UBE-LIF group and 504 in the MIS-TLIF group. UBE-TLIF was superior to MIS-TLIF in terms of intraoperative blood flow, postoperative drainage flow, duration of hospital stay, VAS score for low back pain and ODI score, but the operative time was longer than MIS-TLIF group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of total complication rate, modified Macnab grading criteria, fusion rate, VAS score of leg pain, lumbar lordosis, intervertebral disk height. CONCLUSION: Both UBE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF are effective surgical modalities for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases. They have similar treatment outcomes, but UBE-TLIF has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and faster recovery. Trial registration: This study has been registered at INPLASY.COM (No. INPLASY202320087). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-04138-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10476308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104763082023-09-05 Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis Han, Hao Song, Yifan Li, Yiming Zhou, Hengcai Fu, Yufei Li, Jie J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-TLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases by meta-analysis. METHODS: A computer-based search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) was conducted from the inception of the each database to April 2023. The searched literature was then screened according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The critical data were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager software5.4.1. Pooled effects were calculated on the basis of data attributes by mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies and 949 patients met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis, 445 in the UBE-LIF group and 504 in the MIS-TLIF group. UBE-TLIF was superior to MIS-TLIF in terms of intraoperative blood flow, postoperative drainage flow, duration of hospital stay, VAS score for low back pain and ODI score, but the operative time was longer than MIS-TLIF group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of total complication rate, modified Macnab grading criteria, fusion rate, VAS score of leg pain, lumbar lordosis, intervertebral disk height. CONCLUSION: Both UBE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF are effective surgical modalities for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases. They have similar treatment outcomes, but UBE-TLIF has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and faster recovery. Trial registration: This study has been registered at INPLASY.COM (No. INPLASY202320087). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-04138-0. BioMed Central 2023-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10476308/ /pubmed/37667363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04138-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Han, Hao
Song, Yifan
Li, Yiming
Zhou, Hengcai
Fu, Yufei
Li, Jie
Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04138-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hanhao shorttermclinicalefficacyandsafetyofunilateralbiportalendoscopictransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionversusminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT songyifan shorttermclinicalefficacyandsafetyofunilateralbiportalendoscopictransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionversusminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liyiming shorttermclinicalefficacyandsafetyofunilateralbiportalendoscopictransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionversusminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhouhengcai shorttermclinicalefficacyandsafetyofunilateralbiportalendoscopictransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionversusminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fuyufei shorttermclinicalefficacyandsafetyofunilateralbiportalendoscopictransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionversusminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lijie shorttermclinicalefficacyandsafetyofunilateralbiportalendoscopictransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionversusminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis