Cargando…
Artificial intelligence for non-mass breast lesions detection and classification on ultrasound images: a comparative study
BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aims to validate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) to detect and classify non-mass breast lesions (NMLs) on ultrasound (US) images. METHODS: A total of 228 patients with NMLs and 596 volunteers without breast lesions on US images were enrolled in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02277-2 |
_version_ | 1785100915871580160 |
---|---|
author | Li, Guoqiu Tian, Hongtian Wu, Huaiyu Huang, Zhibin Yang, Keen Li, Jian Luo, Yuwei Shi, Siyuan Cui, Chen Xu, Jinfeng Dong, Fajin |
author_facet | Li, Guoqiu Tian, Hongtian Wu, Huaiyu Huang, Zhibin Yang, Keen Li, Jian Luo, Yuwei Shi, Siyuan Cui, Chen Xu, Jinfeng Dong, Fajin |
author_sort | Li, Guoqiu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aims to validate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) to detect and classify non-mass breast lesions (NMLs) on ultrasound (US) images. METHODS: A total of 228 patients with NMLs and 596 volunteers without breast lesions on US images were enrolled in the study from January 2020 to December 2022. The pathological results served as the gold standard for NMLs. Two AI models were developed to accurately detect and classify NMLs on US images, including DenseNet121_448 and MobileNet_448. To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of AI models, the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, specificity and sensitivity was employed. RESULTS: A total of 228 NMLs patients confirmed by postoperative pathology with 870 US images and 596 volunteers with 1003 US images were enrolled. In the detection experiment, the MobileNet_448 achieved the good performance in the testing set, with the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.999 (95%CI: 0.997-1.000),96.5%,96.9% and 96.1%, respectively. It was no statistically significant compared to DenseNet121_448. In the classification experiment, the MobileNet_448 model achieved the highest diagnostic performance in the testing set, with the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.837 (95%CI: 0.990-1.000), 70.5%, 80.3% and 74.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the AI models, particularly MobileNet_448, can effectively detect and classify NMLs in US images. This technique has the potential to improve early diagnostic accuracy for NMLs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10476370 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104763702023-09-05 Artificial intelligence for non-mass breast lesions detection and classification on ultrasound images: a comparative study Li, Guoqiu Tian, Hongtian Wu, Huaiyu Huang, Zhibin Yang, Keen Li, Jian Luo, Yuwei Shi, Siyuan Cui, Chen Xu, Jinfeng Dong, Fajin BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aims to validate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) to detect and classify non-mass breast lesions (NMLs) on ultrasound (US) images. METHODS: A total of 228 patients with NMLs and 596 volunteers without breast lesions on US images were enrolled in the study from January 2020 to December 2022. The pathological results served as the gold standard for NMLs. Two AI models were developed to accurately detect and classify NMLs on US images, including DenseNet121_448 and MobileNet_448. To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of AI models, the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, specificity and sensitivity was employed. RESULTS: A total of 228 NMLs patients confirmed by postoperative pathology with 870 US images and 596 volunteers with 1003 US images were enrolled. In the detection experiment, the MobileNet_448 achieved the good performance in the testing set, with the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.999 (95%CI: 0.997-1.000),96.5%,96.9% and 96.1%, respectively. It was no statistically significant compared to DenseNet121_448. In the classification experiment, the MobileNet_448 model achieved the highest diagnostic performance in the testing set, with the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.837 (95%CI: 0.990-1.000), 70.5%, 80.3% and 74.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the AI models, particularly MobileNet_448, can effectively detect and classify NMLs in US images. This technique has the potential to improve early diagnostic accuracy for NMLs. BioMed Central 2023-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10476370/ /pubmed/37667320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02277-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Li, Guoqiu Tian, Hongtian Wu, Huaiyu Huang, Zhibin Yang, Keen Li, Jian Luo, Yuwei Shi, Siyuan Cui, Chen Xu, Jinfeng Dong, Fajin Artificial intelligence for non-mass breast lesions detection and classification on ultrasound images: a comparative study |
title | Artificial intelligence for non-mass breast lesions detection and classification on ultrasound images: a comparative study |
title_full | Artificial intelligence for non-mass breast lesions detection and classification on ultrasound images: a comparative study |
title_fullStr | Artificial intelligence for non-mass breast lesions detection and classification on ultrasound images: a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial intelligence for non-mass breast lesions detection and classification on ultrasound images: a comparative study |
title_short | Artificial intelligence for non-mass breast lesions detection and classification on ultrasound images: a comparative study |
title_sort | artificial intelligence for non-mass breast lesions detection and classification on ultrasound images: a comparative study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02277-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liguoqiu artificialintelligencefornonmassbreastlesionsdetectionandclassificationonultrasoundimagesacomparativestudy AT tianhongtian artificialintelligencefornonmassbreastlesionsdetectionandclassificationonultrasoundimagesacomparativestudy AT wuhuaiyu artificialintelligencefornonmassbreastlesionsdetectionandclassificationonultrasoundimagesacomparativestudy AT huangzhibin artificialintelligencefornonmassbreastlesionsdetectionandclassificationonultrasoundimagesacomparativestudy AT yangkeen artificialintelligencefornonmassbreastlesionsdetectionandclassificationonultrasoundimagesacomparativestudy AT lijian artificialintelligencefornonmassbreastlesionsdetectionandclassificationonultrasoundimagesacomparativestudy AT luoyuwei artificialintelligencefornonmassbreastlesionsdetectionandclassificationonultrasoundimagesacomparativestudy AT shisiyuan artificialintelligencefornonmassbreastlesionsdetectionandclassificationonultrasoundimagesacomparativestudy AT cuichen artificialintelligencefornonmassbreastlesionsdetectionandclassificationonultrasoundimagesacomparativestudy AT xujinfeng artificialintelligencefornonmassbreastlesionsdetectionandclassificationonultrasoundimagesacomparativestudy AT dongfajin artificialintelligencefornonmassbreastlesionsdetectionandclassificationonultrasoundimagesacomparativestudy |