Cargando…

Self‐management interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis protocol

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Educational self‐management interventions (SMI) have an important role in improving symptom management, preventing relapse of multiple sclerosis (MS) and promoting quality of life (QoL) of these patients; since there is little knowledge about overall effectiveness of MS self‐man...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heidari‐Soureshjani, Reza, Nasrabadi, Alireza Nikbakht, Zakerimoghadam, Masoumeh, Mohammadi, Tayeb, Rasti, Arezoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37670845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1536
_version_ 1785100938803937280
author Heidari‐Soureshjani, Reza
Nasrabadi, Alireza Nikbakht
Zakerimoghadam, Masoumeh
Mohammadi, Tayeb
Rasti, Arezoo
author_facet Heidari‐Soureshjani, Reza
Nasrabadi, Alireza Nikbakht
Zakerimoghadam, Masoumeh
Mohammadi, Tayeb
Rasti, Arezoo
author_sort Heidari‐Soureshjani, Reza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Educational self‐management interventions (SMI) have an important role in improving symptom management, preventing relapse of multiple sclerosis (MS) and promoting quality of life (QoL) of these patients; since there is little knowledge about overall effectiveness of MS self‐management programs and which types of SMI improves the outcomes, this research aims to assess the efficacy of structured SMI in improving health outcomes in people with MS (PwMS) by synthesizing and compare outcomes from related randomized controlled trials. METHODS: In the present systematic review protocol, the keywords related to self‐management and MS will be searched in electronic databases including (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL]), gray literature resources and key journals from 2000 to July 2023. Research‐related articles will be collected and after removing duplicate articles, will be included in the study. In the screening step, titles and abstracts of articles will be reviewed and after deleting irrelevant articles, the full text of related articles will be evaluated independently by two researchers and data will be extracted from final articles and the findings will be categorized in an extraction table. Risk of bias will be assessed by using the Cochrane collaboration's tool. If possible, the data will be analyzed using random effect models and the statistical analysis will be performed using STATA software (version 14.2) developed by StataCorp. DISCUSSION: Comparative effectiveness of SMI is currently unknown. We will analyze outcome measures used to assess effectiveness of self‐management education in improving QoL, depression, self‐efficacy, pain, and fatigue. These findings will help identify the most promising components of SMIs, guiding targeted interventions for specific subpopulations, and facilitating the design of better interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10476465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104764652023-09-05 Self‐management interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis protocol Heidari‐Soureshjani, Reza Nasrabadi, Alireza Nikbakht Zakerimoghadam, Masoumeh Mohammadi, Tayeb Rasti, Arezoo Health Sci Rep Study Protocols BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Educational self‐management interventions (SMI) have an important role in improving symptom management, preventing relapse of multiple sclerosis (MS) and promoting quality of life (QoL) of these patients; since there is little knowledge about overall effectiveness of MS self‐management programs and which types of SMI improves the outcomes, this research aims to assess the efficacy of structured SMI in improving health outcomes in people with MS (PwMS) by synthesizing and compare outcomes from related randomized controlled trials. METHODS: In the present systematic review protocol, the keywords related to self‐management and MS will be searched in electronic databases including (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL]), gray literature resources and key journals from 2000 to July 2023. Research‐related articles will be collected and after removing duplicate articles, will be included in the study. In the screening step, titles and abstracts of articles will be reviewed and after deleting irrelevant articles, the full text of related articles will be evaluated independently by two researchers and data will be extracted from final articles and the findings will be categorized in an extraction table. Risk of bias will be assessed by using the Cochrane collaboration's tool. If possible, the data will be analyzed using random effect models and the statistical analysis will be performed using STATA software (version 14.2) developed by StataCorp. DISCUSSION: Comparative effectiveness of SMI is currently unknown. We will analyze outcome measures used to assess effectiveness of self‐management education in improving QoL, depression, self‐efficacy, pain, and fatigue. These findings will help identify the most promising components of SMIs, guiding targeted interventions for specific subpopulations, and facilitating the design of better interventions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10476465/ /pubmed/37670845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1536 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocols
Heidari‐Soureshjani, Reza
Nasrabadi, Alireza Nikbakht
Zakerimoghadam, Masoumeh
Mohammadi, Tayeb
Rasti, Arezoo
Self‐management interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis protocol
title Self‐management interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis protocol
title_full Self‐management interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis protocol
title_fullStr Self‐management interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis protocol
title_full_unstemmed Self‐management interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis protocol
title_short Self‐management interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis protocol
title_sort self‐management interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis protocol
topic Study Protocols
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37670845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1536
work_keys_str_mv AT heidarisoureshjanireza selfmanagementinterventionsforpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT nasrabadialirezanikbakht selfmanagementinterventionsforpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT zakerimoghadammasoumeh selfmanagementinterventionsforpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT mohammaditayeb selfmanagementinterventionsforpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT rastiarezoo selfmanagementinterventionsforpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol