Cargando…

The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of dexmedetomidine was elusive for septic shock. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock. METHODS: PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases have been searched through October 2022 and we included ran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Xue, He, Chunyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37657031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034414
_version_ 1785100993144291328
author Huang, Xue
He, Chunyan
author_facet Huang, Xue
He, Chunyan
author_sort Huang, Xue
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of dexmedetomidine was elusive for septic shock. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock. METHODS: PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases have been searched through October 2022 and we included randomized controlled trials reporting the effect of dexmedetomidine in patients with septic shock. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with control group for septic shock, dexmedetomidine treatment was able to substantially decrease Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (mean difference [MD] = ‐0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] = ‐1.14 to ‐0.84; P < .00001) and duration of mechanical ventilation (MD = ‐0.90; 95% CI = ‐1.27 to ‐0.54; P < .00001), but showed no obvious influence on morality at 28 days (odds ratio = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.38 to 1.66; P = 054), hospital mortality (odds ratio = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.35 to 1.24; P = .20) or intensive care unit length of stay (MD = ‐1.47; 95% CI = ‐4.60 to 1.66; P = .36). CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine administration may help treat patients with septic shock.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10476718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104767182023-09-05 The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Huang, Xue He, Chunyan Medicine (Baltimore) 3900 INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of dexmedetomidine was elusive for septic shock. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock. METHODS: PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases have been searched through October 2022 and we included randomized controlled trials reporting the effect of dexmedetomidine in patients with septic shock. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with control group for septic shock, dexmedetomidine treatment was able to substantially decrease Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (mean difference [MD] = ‐0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] = ‐1.14 to ‐0.84; P < .00001) and duration of mechanical ventilation (MD = ‐0.90; 95% CI = ‐1.27 to ‐0.54; P < .00001), but showed no obvious influence on morality at 28 days (odds ratio = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.38 to 1.66; P = 054), hospital mortality (odds ratio = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.35 to 1.24; P = .20) or intensive care unit length of stay (MD = ‐1.47; 95% CI = ‐4.60 to 1.66; P = .36). CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine administration may help treat patients with septic shock. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10476718/ /pubmed/37657031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034414 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle 3900
Huang, Xue
He, Chunyan
The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic 3900
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37657031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034414
work_keys_str_mv AT huangxue theefficacyofdexmedetomidineforsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hechunyan theefficacyofdexmedetomidineforsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huangxue efficacyofdexmedetomidineforsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hechunyan efficacyofdexmedetomidineforsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials