Cargando…
The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of dexmedetomidine was elusive for septic shock. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock. METHODS: PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases have been searched through October 2022 and we included ran...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37657031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034414 |
_version_ | 1785100993144291328 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Xue He, Chunyan |
author_facet | Huang, Xue He, Chunyan |
author_sort | Huang, Xue |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of dexmedetomidine was elusive for septic shock. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock. METHODS: PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases have been searched through October 2022 and we included randomized controlled trials reporting the effect of dexmedetomidine in patients with septic shock. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with control group for septic shock, dexmedetomidine treatment was able to substantially decrease Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (mean difference [MD] = ‐0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] = ‐1.14 to ‐0.84; P < .00001) and duration of mechanical ventilation (MD = ‐0.90; 95% CI = ‐1.27 to ‐0.54; P < .00001), but showed no obvious influence on morality at 28 days (odds ratio = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.38 to 1.66; P = 054), hospital mortality (odds ratio = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.35 to 1.24; P = .20) or intensive care unit length of stay (MD = ‐1.47; 95% CI = ‐4.60 to 1.66; P = .36). CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine administration may help treat patients with septic shock. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10476718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104767182023-09-05 The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Huang, Xue He, Chunyan Medicine (Baltimore) 3900 INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of dexmedetomidine was elusive for septic shock. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock. METHODS: PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases have been searched through October 2022 and we included randomized controlled trials reporting the effect of dexmedetomidine in patients with septic shock. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with control group for septic shock, dexmedetomidine treatment was able to substantially decrease Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (mean difference [MD] = ‐0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] = ‐1.14 to ‐0.84; P < .00001) and duration of mechanical ventilation (MD = ‐0.90; 95% CI = ‐1.27 to ‐0.54; P < .00001), but showed no obvious influence on morality at 28 days (odds ratio = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.38 to 1.66; P = 054), hospital mortality (odds ratio = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.35 to 1.24; P = .20) or intensive care unit length of stay (MD = ‐1.47; 95% CI = ‐4.60 to 1.66; P = .36). CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine administration may help treat patients with septic shock. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10476718/ /pubmed/37657031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034414 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | 3900 Huang, Xue He, Chunyan The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | 3900 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37657031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034414 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangxue theefficacyofdexmedetomidineforsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT hechunyan theefficacyofdexmedetomidineforsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT huangxue efficacyofdexmedetomidineforsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT hechunyan efficacyofdexmedetomidineforsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |