Cargando…

Effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on IMPT delivery efficiency and plan quality

PURPOSE: Improving efficiency of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment can be achieved by shortening the beam delivery time. The purpose of this study is to reduce the delivery time of IMPT, while maintaining the plan quality, by finding the optimal initial proton spot placement parame...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Mingyao, Flampouri, Stella, Stanforth, Alex, Slopsema, Roelf, Diamond, Zachary, LePain, William, Langen, Katja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13997
_version_ 1785101047901978624
author Zhu, Mingyao
Flampouri, Stella
Stanforth, Alex
Slopsema, Roelf
Diamond, Zachary
LePain, William
Langen, Katja
author_facet Zhu, Mingyao
Flampouri, Stella
Stanforth, Alex
Slopsema, Roelf
Diamond, Zachary
LePain, William
Langen, Katja
author_sort Zhu, Mingyao
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Improving efficiency of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment can be achieved by shortening the beam delivery time. The purpose of this study is to reduce the delivery time of IMPT, while maintaining the plan quality, by finding the optimal initial proton spot placement parameters. METHODS: Seven patients previously treated in the thorax and abdomen with gated IMPT and voluntary breath‐hold were included. In the clinical plans, the energy layer spacing (ELS) and spot spacing (SS) were set to 0.6–0.8 (as a scale factor of the default values). For each clinical plan, we created four plans with ELS increased to 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, and SS to 1.0 while keeping all other parameters unchanged. All 35 plans (130 fields) were delivered on a clinical proton machine and the beam delivery time was recorded for each field. RESULTS: Increasing ELS and SS did not cause target coverage reduction. Increasing ELS had no effect on critical organ‐at‐risk (OAR) doses or the integral dose, while increasing SS resulted in slightly higher integral and selected OAR doses. Beam‐on times were 48.4 ± 9.2 (range: 34.1–66.7) seconds for the clinical plans. Time reductions were 9.2 ± 3.3 s (18.7 ± 5.8%), 11.6 ± 3.5 s (23.1 ± 5.9%), and 14.7 ± 3.9 s (28.9 ± 6.1%) when ELS was changed to 1.0, 1.2, and 1.4, respectively, corresponding to 0.76–0.80 s/layer. SS change had a minimal effect (1.1 ± 1.6 s, or 1.9 ± 2.9%) on the beam‐on time. CONCLUSION: Increasing the energy layers spacing can reduce the beam delivery time effectively without compromising IMPT plan quality; increasing the SS had no meaningful impact on beam delivery time and resulted in plan‐quality degradation in some cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10476974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104769742023-09-05 Effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on IMPT delivery efficiency and plan quality Zhu, Mingyao Flampouri, Stella Stanforth, Alex Slopsema, Roelf Diamond, Zachary LePain, William Langen, Katja J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Improving efficiency of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment can be achieved by shortening the beam delivery time. The purpose of this study is to reduce the delivery time of IMPT, while maintaining the plan quality, by finding the optimal initial proton spot placement parameters. METHODS: Seven patients previously treated in the thorax and abdomen with gated IMPT and voluntary breath‐hold were included. In the clinical plans, the energy layer spacing (ELS) and spot spacing (SS) were set to 0.6–0.8 (as a scale factor of the default values). For each clinical plan, we created four plans with ELS increased to 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, and SS to 1.0 while keeping all other parameters unchanged. All 35 plans (130 fields) were delivered on a clinical proton machine and the beam delivery time was recorded for each field. RESULTS: Increasing ELS and SS did not cause target coverage reduction. Increasing ELS had no effect on critical organ‐at‐risk (OAR) doses or the integral dose, while increasing SS resulted in slightly higher integral and selected OAR doses. Beam‐on times were 48.4 ± 9.2 (range: 34.1–66.7) seconds for the clinical plans. Time reductions were 9.2 ± 3.3 s (18.7 ± 5.8%), 11.6 ± 3.5 s (23.1 ± 5.9%), and 14.7 ± 3.9 s (28.9 ± 6.1%) when ELS was changed to 1.0, 1.2, and 1.4, respectively, corresponding to 0.76–0.80 s/layer. SS change had a minimal effect (1.1 ± 1.6 s, or 1.9 ± 2.9%) on the beam‐on time. CONCLUSION: Increasing the energy layers spacing can reduce the beam delivery time effectively without compromising IMPT plan quality; increasing the SS had no meaningful impact on beam delivery time and resulted in plan‐quality degradation in some cases. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10476974/ /pubmed/37101399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13997 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Zhu, Mingyao
Flampouri, Stella
Stanforth, Alex
Slopsema, Roelf
Diamond, Zachary
LePain, William
Langen, Katja
Effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on IMPT delivery efficiency and plan quality
title Effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on IMPT delivery efficiency and plan quality
title_full Effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on IMPT delivery efficiency and plan quality
title_fullStr Effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on IMPT delivery efficiency and plan quality
title_full_unstemmed Effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on IMPT delivery efficiency and plan quality
title_short Effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on IMPT delivery efficiency and plan quality
title_sort effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on impt delivery efficiency and plan quality
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13997
work_keys_str_mv AT zhumingyao effectoftheinitialenergylayerandspotplacementparametersonimptdeliveryefficiencyandplanquality
AT flampouristella effectoftheinitialenergylayerandspotplacementparametersonimptdeliveryefficiencyandplanquality
AT stanforthalex effectoftheinitialenergylayerandspotplacementparametersonimptdeliveryefficiencyandplanquality
AT slopsemaroelf effectoftheinitialenergylayerandspotplacementparametersonimptdeliveryefficiencyandplanquality
AT diamondzachary effectoftheinitialenergylayerandspotplacementparametersonimptdeliveryefficiencyandplanquality
AT lepainwilliam effectoftheinitialenergylayerandspotplacementparametersonimptdeliveryefficiencyandplanquality
AT langenkatja effectoftheinitialenergylayerandspotplacementparametersonimptdeliveryefficiencyandplanquality