Cargando…
Effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on IMPT delivery efficiency and plan quality
PURPOSE: Improving efficiency of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment can be achieved by shortening the beam delivery time. The purpose of this study is to reduce the delivery time of IMPT, while maintaining the plan quality, by finding the optimal initial proton spot placement parame...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13997 |
_version_ | 1785101047901978624 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Mingyao Flampouri, Stella Stanforth, Alex Slopsema, Roelf Diamond, Zachary LePain, William Langen, Katja |
author_facet | Zhu, Mingyao Flampouri, Stella Stanforth, Alex Slopsema, Roelf Diamond, Zachary LePain, William Langen, Katja |
author_sort | Zhu, Mingyao |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Improving efficiency of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment can be achieved by shortening the beam delivery time. The purpose of this study is to reduce the delivery time of IMPT, while maintaining the plan quality, by finding the optimal initial proton spot placement parameters. METHODS: Seven patients previously treated in the thorax and abdomen with gated IMPT and voluntary breath‐hold were included. In the clinical plans, the energy layer spacing (ELS) and spot spacing (SS) were set to 0.6–0.8 (as a scale factor of the default values). For each clinical plan, we created four plans with ELS increased to 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, and SS to 1.0 while keeping all other parameters unchanged. All 35 plans (130 fields) were delivered on a clinical proton machine and the beam delivery time was recorded for each field. RESULTS: Increasing ELS and SS did not cause target coverage reduction. Increasing ELS had no effect on critical organ‐at‐risk (OAR) doses or the integral dose, while increasing SS resulted in slightly higher integral and selected OAR doses. Beam‐on times were 48.4 ± 9.2 (range: 34.1–66.7) seconds for the clinical plans. Time reductions were 9.2 ± 3.3 s (18.7 ± 5.8%), 11.6 ± 3.5 s (23.1 ± 5.9%), and 14.7 ± 3.9 s (28.9 ± 6.1%) when ELS was changed to 1.0, 1.2, and 1.4, respectively, corresponding to 0.76–0.80 s/layer. SS change had a minimal effect (1.1 ± 1.6 s, or 1.9 ± 2.9%) on the beam‐on time. CONCLUSION: Increasing the energy layers spacing can reduce the beam delivery time effectively without compromising IMPT plan quality; increasing the SS had no meaningful impact on beam delivery time and resulted in plan‐quality degradation in some cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10476974 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104769742023-09-05 Effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on IMPT delivery efficiency and plan quality Zhu, Mingyao Flampouri, Stella Stanforth, Alex Slopsema, Roelf Diamond, Zachary LePain, William Langen, Katja J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Improving efficiency of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment can be achieved by shortening the beam delivery time. The purpose of this study is to reduce the delivery time of IMPT, while maintaining the plan quality, by finding the optimal initial proton spot placement parameters. METHODS: Seven patients previously treated in the thorax and abdomen with gated IMPT and voluntary breath‐hold were included. In the clinical plans, the energy layer spacing (ELS) and spot spacing (SS) were set to 0.6–0.8 (as a scale factor of the default values). For each clinical plan, we created four plans with ELS increased to 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, and SS to 1.0 while keeping all other parameters unchanged. All 35 plans (130 fields) were delivered on a clinical proton machine and the beam delivery time was recorded for each field. RESULTS: Increasing ELS and SS did not cause target coverage reduction. Increasing ELS had no effect on critical organ‐at‐risk (OAR) doses or the integral dose, while increasing SS resulted in slightly higher integral and selected OAR doses. Beam‐on times were 48.4 ± 9.2 (range: 34.1–66.7) seconds for the clinical plans. Time reductions were 9.2 ± 3.3 s (18.7 ± 5.8%), 11.6 ± 3.5 s (23.1 ± 5.9%), and 14.7 ± 3.9 s (28.9 ± 6.1%) when ELS was changed to 1.0, 1.2, and 1.4, respectively, corresponding to 0.76–0.80 s/layer. SS change had a minimal effect (1.1 ± 1.6 s, or 1.9 ± 2.9%) on the beam‐on time. CONCLUSION: Increasing the energy layers spacing can reduce the beam delivery time effectively without compromising IMPT plan quality; increasing the SS had no meaningful impact on beam delivery time and resulted in plan‐quality degradation in some cases. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10476974/ /pubmed/37101399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13997 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Zhu, Mingyao Flampouri, Stella Stanforth, Alex Slopsema, Roelf Diamond, Zachary LePain, William Langen, Katja Effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on IMPT delivery efficiency and plan quality |
title | Effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on IMPT delivery efficiency and plan quality |
title_full | Effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on IMPT delivery efficiency and plan quality |
title_fullStr | Effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on IMPT delivery efficiency and plan quality |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on IMPT delivery efficiency and plan quality |
title_short | Effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on IMPT delivery efficiency and plan quality |
title_sort | effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on impt delivery efficiency and plan quality |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13997 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhumingyao effectoftheinitialenergylayerandspotplacementparametersonimptdeliveryefficiencyandplanquality AT flampouristella effectoftheinitialenergylayerandspotplacementparametersonimptdeliveryefficiencyandplanquality AT stanforthalex effectoftheinitialenergylayerandspotplacementparametersonimptdeliveryefficiencyandplanquality AT slopsemaroelf effectoftheinitialenergylayerandspotplacementparametersonimptdeliveryefficiencyandplanquality AT diamondzachary effectoftheinitialenergylayerandspotplacementparametersonimptdeliveryefficiencyandplanquality AT lepainwilliam effectoftheinitialenergylayerandspotplacementparametersonimptdeliveryefficiencyandplanquality AT langenkatja effectoftheinitialenergylayerandspotplacementparametersonimptdeliveryefficiencyandplanquality |