Cargando…

Evaluation of a high resolution diode array for CyberKnife quality assurance

PURPOSE: The CyberKnife quality assurance (QA) program relies mainly on the use of radiochromic film (RCF). We aimed at evaluating high‐resolution arrays of detectors as an alternative to films for CyberKnife machine QA. METHODS: This study will test the SRS Mapcheck (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, Florida...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García‐Fuentes, Juan D., Sevillano, David, Colmenares, Rafael, Capuz, Ana B., Morís, Rafael, Cámara, Miguel, Galiano, Pablo, Williamson, Sandra, Béjar, María J., Prieto, Daniel, García‐Vicente, Feliciano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37247259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14053
_version_ 1785101048659050496
author García‐Fuentes, Juan D.
Sevillano, David
Colmenares, Rafael
Capuz, Ana B.
Morís, Rafael
Cámara, Miguel
Galiano, Pablo
Williamson, Sandra
Béjar, María J.
Prieto, Daniel
García‐Vicente, Feliciano
author_facet García‐Fuentes, Juan D.
Sevillano, David
Colmenares, Rafael
Capuz, Ana B.
Morís, Rafael
Cámara, Miguel
Galiano, Pablo
Williamson, Sandra
Béjar, María J.
Prieto, Daniel
García‐Vicente, Feliciano
author_sort García‐Fuentes, Juan D.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The CyberKnife quality assurance (QA) program relies mainly on the use of radiochromic film (RCF). We aimed at evaluating high‐resolution arrays of detectors as an alternative to films for CyberKnife machine QA. METHODS: This study will test the SRS Mapcheck (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, Florida, USA) diode array and its own software, which allows three tests of the CyberKnife QA program to be performed. The first one is a geometrical accuracy test based on the delivery of two orthogonal beams (Automated Quality Assurance, AQA). Besides comparing the constancy and repeatability of both methods, known errors will be introduced to check their sensitivity. The second checks the constancy of the iris collimator field sizes (Iris QA). Changes in the field sizes will be introduced to study the array sensitivity. The last test checks the correct positioning of the multileaf collimator (MLC). It will be tested introducing known systematic displacements to whole banks and to single leaves. RESULTS: The results of the RCF and diode array were equivalent (maximum differences of 0.18 ± 0.14 mm) for the AQA test, showing the array a higher reproducibility. When known errors were introduced, both methods behaved linearly with similar slopes. Regarding Iris QA, the array measurements are highly linear when changes in the field sizes are introduced. Linear regressions show slopes of 0.96–1.17 with r (2) above 0.99 in all field sizes. Diode array seems to detect changes of 0.1 mm. In MLC QA, systematic errors of the whole bank of leaves were not detected by the array, while single leaf errors were detected. CONCLUSIONS: The diode array is sensitive and accurate in the AQA and Iris QA tests, which give us the possibility of substituting RCF with a diode array. QA would be performed faster than using the film procedure, obtaining reliable results. Regarding the MLC QA, the inability to detect systematic displacements make it difficult to confidently use the detector.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10476977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104769772023-09-05 Evaluation of a high resolution diode array for CyberKnife quality assurance García‐Fuentes, Juan D. Sevillano, David Colmenares, Rafael Capuz, Ana B. Morís, Rafael Cámara, Miguel Galiano, Pablo Williamson, Sandra Béjar, María J. Prieto, Daniel García‐Vicente, Feliciano J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The CyberKnife quality assurance (QA) program relies mainly on the use of radiochromic film (RCF). We aimed at evaluating high‐resolution arrays of detectors as an alternative to films for CyberKnife machine QA. METHODS: This study will test the SRS Mapcheck (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, Florida, USA) diode array and its own software, which allows three tests of the CyberKnife QA program to be performed. The first one is a geometrical accuracy test based on the delivery of two orthogonal beams (Automated Quality Assurance, AQA). Besides comparing the constancy and repeatability of both methods, known errors will be introduced to check their sensitivity. The second checks the constancy of the iris collimator field sizes (Iris QA). Changes in the field sizes will be introduced to study the array sensitivity. The last test checks the correct positioning of the multileaf collimator (MLC). It will be tested introducing known systematic displacements to whole banks and to single leaves. RESULTS: The results of the RCF and diode array were equivalent (maximum differences of 0.18 ± 0.14 mm) for the AQA test, showing the array a higher reproducibility. When known errors were introduced, both methods behaved linearly with similar slopes. Regarding Iris QA, the array measurements are highly linear when changes in the field sizes are introduced. Linear regressions show slopes of 0.96–1.17 with r (2) above 0.99 in all field sizes. Diode array seems to detect changes of 0.1 mm. In MLC QA, systematic errors of the whole bank of leaves were not detected by the array, while single leaf errors were detected. CONCLUSIONS: The diode array is sensitive and accurate in the AQA and Iris QA tests, which give us the possibility of substituting RCF with a diode array. QA would be performed faster than using the film procedure, obtaining reliable results. Regarding the MLC QA, the inability to detect systematic displacements make it difficult to confidently use the detector. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10476977/ /pubmed/37247259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14053 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
García‐Fuentes, Juan D.
Sevillano, David
Colmenares, Rafael
Capuz, Ana B.
Morís, Rafael
Cámara, Miguel
Galiano, Pablo
Williamson, Sandra
Béjar, María J.
Prieto, Daniel
García‐Vicente, Feliciano
Evaluation of a high resolution diode array for CyberKnife quality assurance
title Evaluation of a high resolution diode array for CyberKnife quality assurance
title_full Evaluation of a high resolution diode array for CyberKnife quality assurance
title_fullStr Evaluation of a high resolution diode array for CyberKnife quality assurance
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a high resolution diode array for CyberKnife quality assurance
title_short Evaluation of a high resolution diode array for CyberKnife quality assurance
title_sort evaluation of a high resolution diode array for cyberknife quality assurance
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37247259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14053
work_keys_str_mv AT garciafuentesjuand evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance
AT sevillanodavid evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance
AT colmenaresrafael evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance
AT capuzanab evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance
AT morisrafael evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance
AT camaramiguel evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance
AT galianopablo evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance
AT williamsonsandra evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance
AT bejarmariaj evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance
AT prietodaniel evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance
AT garciavicentefeliciano evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance