Cargando…
Evaluation of a high resolution diode array for CyberKnife quality assurance
PURPOSE: The CyberKnife quality assurance (QA) program relies mainly on the use of radiochromic film (RCF). We aimed at evaluating high‐resolution arrays of detectors as an alternative to films for CyberKnife machine QA. METHODS: This study will test the SRS Mapcheck (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, Florida...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37247259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14053 |
_version_ | 1785101048659050496 |
---|---|
author | García‐Fuentes, Juan D. Sevillano, David Colmenares, Rafael Capuz, Ana B. Morís, Rafael Cámara, Miguel Galiano, Pablo Williamson, Sandra Béjar, María J. Prieto, Daniel García‐Vicente, Feliciano |
author_facet | García‐Fuentes, Juan D. Sevillano, David Colmenares, Rafael Capuz, Ana B. Morís, Rafael Cámara, Miguel Galiano, Pablo Williamson, Sandra Béjar, María J. Prieto, Daniel García‐Vicente, Feliciano |
author_sort | García‐Fuentes, Juan D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The CyberKnife quality assurance (QA) program relies mainly on the use of radiochromic film (RCF). We aimed at evaluating high‐resolution arrays of detectors as an alternative to films for CyberKnife machine QA. METHODS: This study will test the SRS Mapcheck (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, Florida, USA) diode array and its own software, which allows three tests of the CyberKnife QA program to be performed. The first one is a geometrical accuracy test based on the delivery of two orthogonal beams (Automated Quality Assurance, AQA). Besides comparing the constancy and repeatability of both methods, known errors will be introduced to check their sensitivity. The second checks the constancy of the iris collimator field sizes (Iris QA). Changes in the field sizes will be introduced to study the array sensitivity. The last test checks the correct positioning of the multileaf collimator (MLC). It will be tested introducing known systematic displacements to whole banks and to single leaves. RESULTS: The results of the RCF and diode array were equivalent (maximum differences of 0.18 ± 0.14 mm) for the AQA test, showing the array a higher reproducibility. When known errors were introduced, both methods behaved linearly with similar slopes. Regarding Iris QA, the array measurements are highly linear when changes in the field sizes are introduced. Linear regressions show slopes of 0.96–1.17 with r (2) above 0.99 in all field sizes. Diode array seems to detect changes of 0.1 mm. In MLC QA, systematic errors of the whole bank of leaves were not detected by the array, while single leaf errors were detected. CONCLUSIONS: The diode array is sensitive and accurate in the AQA and Iris QA tests, which give us the possibility of substituting RCF with a diode array. QA would be performed faster than using the film procedure, obtaining reliable results. Regarding the MLC QA, the inability to detect systematic displacements make it difficult to confidently use the detector. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10476977 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104769772023-09-05 Evaluation of a high resolution diode array for CyberKnife quality assurance García‐Fuentes, Juan D. Sevillano, David Colmenares, Rafael Capuz, Ana B. Morís, Rafael Cámara, Miguel Galiano, Pablo Williamson, Sandra Béjar, María J. Prieto, Daniel García‐Vicente, Feliciano J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The CyberKnife quality assurance (QA) program relies mainly on the use of radiochromic film (RCF). We aimed at evaluating high‐resolution arrays of detectors as an alternative to films for CyberKnife machine QA. METHODS: This study will test the SRS Mapcheck (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, Florida, USA) diode array and its own software, which allows three tests of the CyberKnife QA program to be performed. The first one is a geometrical accuracy test based on the delivery of two orthogonal beams (Automated Quality Assurance, AQA). Besides comparing the constancy and repeatability of both methods, known errors will be introduced to check their sensitivity. The second checks the constancy of the iris collimator field sizes (Iris QA). Changes in the field sizes will be introduced to study the array sensitivity. The last test checks the correct positioning of the multileaf collimator (MLC). It will be tested introducing known systematic displacements to whole banks and to single leaves. RESULTS: The results of the RCF and diode array were equivalent (maximum differences of 0.18 ± 0.14 mm) for the AQA test, showing the array a higher reproducibility. When known errors were introduced, both methods behaved linearly with similar slopes. Regarding Iris QA, the array measurements are highly linear when changes in the field sizes are introduced. Linear regressions show slopes of 0.96–1.17 with r (2) above 0.99 in all field sizes. Diode array seems to detect changes of 0.1 mm. In MLC QA, systematic errors of the whole bank of leaves were not detected by the array, while single leaf errors were detected. CONCLUSIONS: The diode array is sensitive and accurate in the AQA and Iris QA tests, which give us the possibility of substituting RCF with a diode array. QA would be performed faster than using the film procedure, obtaining reliable results. Regarding the MLC QA, the inability to detect systematic displacements make it difficult to confidently use the detector. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10476977/ /pubmed/37247259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14053 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics García‐Fuentes, Juan D. Sevillano, David Colmenares, Rafael Capuz, Ana B. Morís, Rafael Cámara, Miguel Galiano, Pablo Williamson, Sandra Béjar, María J. Prieto, Daniel García‐Vicente, Feliciano Evaluation of a high resolution diode array for CyberKnife quality assurance |
title | Evaluation of a high resolution diode array for CyberKnife quality assurance |
title_full | Evaluation of a high resolution diode array for CyberKnife quality assurance |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a high resolution diode array for CyberKnife quality assurance |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a high resolution diode array for CyberKnife quality assurance |
title_short | Evaluation of a high resolution diode array for CyberKnife quality assurance |
title_sort | evaluation of a high resolution diode array for cyberknife quality assurance |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37247259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciafuentesjuand evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance AT sevillanodavid evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance AT colmenaresrafael evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance AT capuzanab evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance AT morisrafael evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance AT camaramiguel evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance AT galianopablo evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance AT williamsonsandra evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance AT bejarmariaj evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance AT prietodaniel evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance AT garciavicentefeliciano evaluationofahighresolutiondiodearrayforcyberknifequalityassurance |