Cargando…

Referral rate and false-positive rates in a hearing screening program among high-risk newborns

AIM: More studies exploring referral rates and false-positive rates are needed to make hearing screening programs in newborns better and cost-effective. Our aim was to study the referral and false-positivity rates among high-risk newborns in our hearing screening program and to analyze the factors p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thangavelu, Kruthika, Martakis, Kyriakos, Feldmann, Silke, Roth, Bernhard, Lang-Roth, Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10477105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37154942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07978-y
_version_ 1785101074447728640
author Thangavelu, Kruthika
Martakis, Kyriakos
Feldmann, Silke
Roth, Bernhard
Lang-Roth, Ruth
author_facet Thangavelu, Kruthika
Martakis, Kyriakos
Feldmann, Silke
Roth, Bernhard
Lang-Roth, Ruth
author_sort Thangavelu, Kruthika
collection PubMed
description AIM: More studies exploring referral rates and false-positive rates are needed to make hearing screening programs in newborns better and cost-effective. Our aim was to study the referral and false-positivity rates among high-risk newborns in our hearing screening program and to analyze the factors potentially associated with false-positive hearing screening test results. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was done among the newborns hospitalized at a university hospital from January 2009 to December 2014 that underwent hearing screening with a two-staged AABR screening protocol. Referral rates and false-positivity rates were calculated and possible risk factors for false-positivity were analyzed. RESULTS: 4512 newborns were screened for hearing loss in the neonatology department. The referral rate for the two-staged AABR-only screening was 3.8% with false-positivity being 2.9%. Our study showed that the higher the birthweight or gestational age of the newborn, the lower the odds of the hearing screening results being false-positive, and the higher the chronological age of the infant at the time of screening, the higher the odds of the results being false-positive. Our study did not show a clear association between the mode of delivery or gender and false-positivity. CONCLUSION: Among high-risk infants, prematurity and low-birthweight increased the rate of false-positivity in the hearing screening, and the chronological age at the time of the test seems to be significantly associated with false-positivity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-023-07978-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10477105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104771052023-09-06 Referral rate and false-positive rates in a hearing screening program among high-risk newborns Thangavelu, Kruthika Martakis, Kyriakos Feldmann, Silke Roth, Bernhard Lang-Roth, Ruth Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology AIM: More studies exploring referral rates and false-positive rates are needed to make hearing screening programs in newborns better and cost-effective. Our aim was to study the referral and false-positivity rates among high-risk newborns in our hearing screening program and to analyze the factors potentially associated with false-positive hearing screening test results. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was done among the newborns hospitalized at a university hospital from January 2009 to December 2014 that underwent hearing screening with a two-staged AABR screening protocol. Referral rates and false-positivity rates were calculated and possible risk factors for false-positivity were analyzed. RESULTS: 4512 newborns were screened for hearing loss in the neonatology department. The referral rate for the two-staged AABR-only screening was 3.8% with false-positivity being 2.9%. Our study showed that the higher the birthweight or gestational age of the newborn, the lower the odds of the hearing screening results being false-positive, and the higher the chronological age of the infant at the time of screening, the higher the odds of the results being false-positive. Our study did not show a clear association between the mode of delivery or gender and false-positivity. CONCLUSION: Among high-risk infants, prematurity and low-birthweight increased the rate of false-positivity in the hearing screening, and the chronological age at the time of the test seems to be significantly associated with false-positivity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-023-07978-y. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-05-08 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10477105/ /pubmed/37154942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07978-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Otology
Thangavelu, Kruthika
Martakis, Kyriakos
Feldmann, Silke
Roth, Bernhard
Lang-Roth, Ruth
Referral rate and false-positive rates in a hearing screening program among high-risk newborns
title Referral rate and false-positive rates in a hearing screening program among high-risk newborns
title_full Referral rate and false-positive rates in a hearing screening program among high-risk newborns
title_fullStr Referral rate and false-positive rates in a hearing screening program among high-risk newborns
title_full_unstemmed Referral rate and false-positive rates in a hearing screening program among high-risk newborns
title_short Referral rate and false-positive rates in a hearing screening program among high-risk newborns
title_sort referral rate and false-positive rates in a hearing screening program among high-risk newborns
topic Otology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10477105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37154942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07978-y
work_keys_str_mv AT thangavelukruthika referralrateandfalsepositiveratesinahearingscreeningprogramamonghighrisknewborns
AT martakiskyriakos referralrateandfalsepositiveratesinahearingscreeningprogramamonghighrisknewborns
AT feldmannsilke referralrateandfalsepositiveratesinahearingscreeningprogramamonghighrisknewborns
AT rothbernhard referralrateandfalsepositiveratesinahearingscreeningprogramamonghighrisknewborns
AT langrothruth referralrateandfalsepositiveratesinahearingscreeningprogramamonghighrisknewborns