Cargando…

Consensus for management of sacral fractures: from the diagnosis to the treatment, with a focus on the role of decompression in sacral fractures

BACKGROUND: There is no evidence in the current literature about the best treatment option in sacral fracture with or without neurological impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Italian Pelvic Trauma Association (A.I.P.) decided to organize a consensus to define the best treatment for traumatic and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aprato, Alessandro, Branca Vergano, Luigi, Casiraghi, Alessandro, Liuzza, Francesco, Mezzadri, Umberto, Balagna, Alberto, Prandoni, Lorenzo, Rohayem, Mohamed, Sacchi, Lorenzo, Smakaj, Amarildo, Arduini, Mario, Are, Alessandro, Battiato, Concetto, Berlusconi, Marco, Bove, Federico, Cattaneo, Stefano, Cavanna, Matteo, Chiodini, Federico, Commessatti, Matteo, Addevico, Francesco, Erasmo, Rocco, Ferreli, Alberto, Galante, Claudio, Giorgi, Pietro Domenico, Lamponi, Federico, Moghnie, Alessandro, Oransky, Michel, Panella, Antonio, Pascarella, Raffaele, Santolini, Federico, Schiro, Giuseppe Rosario, Stella, Marco, Zoccola, Kristijan, Massé, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10477162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37665518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00726-2
_version_ 1785101089466482688
author Aprato, Alessandro
Branca Vergano, Luigi
Casiraghi, Alessandro
Liuzza, Francesco
Mezzadri, Umberto
Balagna, Alberto
Prandoni, Lorenzo
Rohayem, Mohamed
Sacchi, Lorenzo
Smakaj, Amarildo
Arduini, Mario
Are, Alessandro
Battiato, Concetto
Berlusconi, Marco
Bove, Federico
Cattaneo, Stefano
Cavanna, Matteo
Chiodini, Federico
Commessatti, Matteo
Addevico, Francesco
Erasmo, Rocco
Ferreli, Alberto
Galante, Claudio
Giorgi, Pietro Domenico
Lamponi, Federico
Moghnie, Alessandro
Oransky, Michel
Panella, Antonio
Pascarella, Raffaele
Santolini, Federico
Schiro, Giuseppe Rosario
Stella, Marco
Zoccola, Kristijan
Massé, Alessandro
author_facet Aprato, Alessandro
Branca Vergano, Luigi
Casiraghi, Alessandro
Liuzza, Francesco
Mezzadri, Umberto
Balagna, Alberto
Prandoni, Lorenzo
Rohayem, Mohamed
Sacchi, Lorenzo
Smakaj, Amarildo
Arduini, Mario
Are, Alessandro
Battiato, Concetto
Berlusconi, Marco
Bove, Federico
Cattaneo, Stefano
Cavanna, Matteo
Chiodini, Federico
Commessatti, Matteo
Addevico, Francesco
Erasmo, Rocco
Ferreli, Alberto
Galante, Claudio
Giorgi, Pietro Domenico
Lamponi, Federico
Moghnie, Alessandro
Oransky, Michel
Panella, Antonio
Pascarella, Raffaele
Santolini, Federico
Schiro, Giuseppe Rosario
Stella, Marco
Zoccola, Kristijan
Massé, Alessandro
author_sort Aprato, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is no evidence in the current literature about the best treatment option in sacral fracture with or without neurological impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Italian Pelvic Trauma Association (A.I.P.) decided to organize a consensus to define the best treatment for traumatic and insufficiency fractures according to neurological impairment. RESULTS: Consensus has been reached for the following statements: When complete neurological examination cannot be performed, pelvic X-rays, CT scan, hip and pelvis MRI, lumbosacral MRI, and lower extremities evoked potentials are useful. Lower extremities EMG should not be used in an acute setting; a patient with cauda equina syndrome associated with a sacral fracture represents an absolute indication for sacral reduction and the correct timing for reduction is “as early as possible”. An isolated and incomplete radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs does not represent an indication for laminectomy after reduction in the case of a displaced sacral fracture in a high-energy trauma, while a worsening and progressive radicular neurological deficit represents an indication. In the case of a displaced sacral fracture and neurological deficit with imaging showing no evidence of nerve root compression, a laminectomy after reduction is not indicated. In a patient who was not initially investigated from a neurological point of view, if a clinical investigation conducted after 72 h identifies a neurological deficit in the presence of a displaced sacral fracture with nerve compression on MRI, a laminectomy after reduction may be indicated. In the case of an indication to perform a sacral decompression, a first attempt with closed reduction through external manoeuvres is not mandatory. Transcondylar traction does not represent a valid method for performing a closed decompression. Following a sacral decompression, a sacral fixation (e.g. sacroiliac screw, triangular osteosynthesis, lumbopelvic fixation) should be performed. An isolated and complete radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs represents an indication for laminectomy after reduction in the case of a displaced sacral fracture in a low-energy trauma associated with imaging suggestive of root compression. An isolated and incomplete radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs does not represent an absolute indication. A worsening and progressive radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs represents an indication for laminectomy after reduction in the case of a displaced sacral fracture in a low-energy trauma associated with imaging suggestive of root compression. In the case of a displaced sacral fracture and neurological deficit in a low-energy trauma, sacral decompression followed by surgical fixation is indicated. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus collects expert opinion about this topic and may guide the surgeon in choosing the best treatment for these patients. Level of Evidence: IV. Trial registration: not applicable (consensus paper).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10477162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104771622023-09-06 Consensus for management of sacral fractures: from the diagnosis to the treatment, with a focus on the role of decompression in sacral fractures Aprato, Alessandro Branca Vergano, Luigi Casiraghi, Alessandro Liuzza, Francesco Mezzadri, Umberto Balagna, Alberto Prandoni, Lorenzo Rohayem, Mohamed Sacchi, Lorenzo Smakaj, Amarildo Arduini, Mario Are, Alessandro Battiato, Concetto Berlusconi, Marco Bove, Federico Cattaneo, Stefano Cavanna, Matteo Chiodini, Federico Commessatti, Matteo Addevico, Francesco Erasmo, Rocco Ferreli, Alberto Galante, Claudio Giorgi, Pietro Domenico Lamponi, Federico Moghnie, Alessandro Oransky, Michel Panella, Antonio Pascarella, Raffaele Santolini, Federico Schiro, Giuseppe Rosario Stella, Marco Zoccola, Kristijan Massé, Alessandro J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: There is no evidence in the current literature about the best treatment option in sacral fracture with or without neurological impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Italian Pelvic Trauma Association (A.I.P.) decided to organize a consensus to define the best treatment for traumatic and insufficiency fractures according to neurological impairment. RESULTS: Consensus has been reached for the following statements: When complete neurological examination cannot be performed, pelvic X-rays, CT scan, hip and pelvis MRI, lumbosacral MRI, and lower extremities evoked potentials are useful. Lower extremities EMG should not be used in an acute setting; a patient with cauda equina syndrome associated with a sacral fracture represents an absolute indication for sacral reduction and the correct timing for reduction is “as early as possible”. An isolated and incomplete radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs does not represent an indication for laminectomy after reduction in the case of a displaced sacral fracture in a high-energy trauma, while a worsening and progressive radicular neurological deficit represents an indication. In the case of a displaced sacral fracture and neurological deficit with imaging showing no evidence of nerve root compression, a laminectomy after reduction is not indicated. In a patient who was not initially investigated from a neurological point of view, if a clinical investigation conducted after 72 h identifies a neurological deficit in the presence of a displaced sacral fracture with nerve compression on MRI, a laminectomy after reduction may be indicated. In the case of an indication to perform a sacral decompression, a first attempt with closed reduction through external manoeuvres is not mandatory. Transcondylar traction does not represent a valid method for performing a closed decompression. Following a sacral decompression, a sacral fixation (e.g. sacroiliac screw, triangular osteosynthesis, lumbopelvic fixation) should be performed. An isolated and complete radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs represents an indication for laminectomy after reduction in the case of a displaced sacral fracture in a low-energy trauma associated with imaging suggestive of root compression. An isolated and incomplete radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs does not represent an absolute indication. A worsening and progressive radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs represents an indication for laminectomy after reduction in the case of a displaced sacral fracture in a low-energy trauma associated with imaging suggestive of root compression. In the case of a displaced sacral fracture and neurological deficit in a low-energy trauma, sacral decompression followed by surgical fixation is indicated. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus collects expert opinion about this topic and may guide the surgeon in choosing the best treatment for these patients. Level of Evidence: IV. Trial registration: not applicable (consensus paper). Springer International Publishing 2023-09-04 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10477162/ /pubmed/37665518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00726-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Aprato, Alessandro
Branca Vergano, Luigi
Casiraghi, Alessandro
Liuzza, Francesco
Mezzadri, Umberto
Balagna, Alberto
Prandoni, Lorenzo
Rohayem, Mohamed
Sacchi, Lorenzo
Smakaj, Amarildo
Arduini, Mario
Are, Alessandro
Battiato, Concetto
Berlusconi, Marco
Bove, Federico
Cattaneo, Stefano
Cavanna, Matteo
Chiodini, Federico
Commessatti, Matteo
Addevico, Francesco
Erasmo, Rocco
Ferreli, Alberto
Galante, Claudio
Giorgi, Pietro Domenico
Lamponi, Federico
Moghnie, Alessandro
Oransky, Michel
Panella, Antonio
Pascarella, Raffaele
Santolini, Federico
Schiro, Giuseppe Rosario
Stella, Marco
Zoccola, Kristijan
Massé, Alessandro
Consensus for management of sacral fractures: from the diagnosis to the treatment, with a focus on the role of decompression in sacral fractures
title Consensus for management of sacral fractures: from the diagnosis to the treatment, with a focus on the role of decompression in sacral fractures
title_full Consensus for management of sacral fractures: from the diagnosis to the treatment, with a focus on the role of decompression in sacral fractures
title_fullStr Consensus for management of sacral fractures: from the diagnosis to the treatment, with a focus on the role of decompression in sacral fractures
title_full_unstemmed Consensus for management of sacral fractures: from the diagnosis to the treatment, with a focus on the role of decompression in sacral fractures
title_short Consensus for management of sacral fractures: from the diagnosis to the treatment, with a focus on the role of decompression in sacral fractures
title_sort consensus for management of sacral fractures: from the diagnosis to the treatment, with a focus on the role of decompression in sacral fractures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10477162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37665518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00726-2
work_keys_str_mv AT apratoalessandro consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT brancaverganoluigi consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT casiraghialessandro consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT liuzzafrancesco consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT mezzadriumberto consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT balagnaalberto consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT prandonilorenzo consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT rohayemmohamed consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT sacchilorenzo consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT smakajamarildo consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT arduinimario consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT arealessandro consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT battiatoconcetto consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT berlusconimarco consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT bovefederico consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT cattaneostefano consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT cavannamatteo consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT chiodinifederico consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT commessattimatteo consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT addevicofrancesco consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT erasmorocco consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT ferrelialberto consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT galanteclaudio consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT giorgipietrodomenico consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT lamponifederico consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT moghniealessandro consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT oranskymichel consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT panellaantonio consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT pascarellaraffaele consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT santolinifederico consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT schirogiusepperosario consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT stellamarco consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT zoccolakristijan consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures
AT massealessandro consensusformanagementofsacralfracturesfromthediagnosistothetreatmentwithafocusontheroleofdecompressioninsacralfractures