Cargando…

16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles from diverse avian faeces are largely independent of DNA preservation and extraction method

The avian gut microbiota has been the subject of considerable recent attention, with potential implications for diverse fields such as the poultry industry, microbial ecology, and conservation. Faecal microbiotas are frequently used as a non-invasive proxy for the gut microbiota, however the extract...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edwards, Johnson, Hoffbeck, Carmen, West, Annie G., Pas, An, Taylor, Michael W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10477782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37675430
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1239167
_version_ 1785101209057624064
author Edwards, Johnson
Hoffbeck, Carmen
West, Annie G.
Pas, An
Taylor, Michael W.
author_facet Edwards, Johnson
Hoffbeck, Carmen
West, Annie G.
Pas, An
Taylor, Michael W.
author_sort Edwards, Johnson
collection PubMed
description The avian gut microbiota has been the subject of considerable recent attention, with potential implications for diverse fields such as the poultry industry, microbial ecology, and conservation. Faecal microbiotas are frequently used as a non-invasive proxy for the gut microbiota, however the extraction of high-quality microbial DNA from avian faeces has often proven challenging. Here we aimed to evaluate the performance of two DNA preservation methods (95% ethanol and RNAlater) and five extraction approaches (IndiSpin Pathogen Kit, QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit, MicroGEM PrepGEM Bacteria Kit, ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit, and an in-house phase separation-based method) for studying the avian gut microbiota. Systematic testing of the efficacy of these approaches on faecal samples from an initial three avian species (chicken, ostrich, and the flightless parrot kākāpō) revealed substantial differences in the quality, quantity and integrity of extracted DNA, but negligible influence of applied method on 16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles. Subsequent testing with a selected combination of preservation and extraction method on 10 further phylogenetically and ecologically diverse avian species reiterated the efficacy of the chosen approach, with bacterial community structure clustering strongly by technical replicates for a given avian species. Our finding that marked differences in extraction efficacy do not appear to influence 16S rRNA gene-based bacterial community profiles provides an important foundation for ongoing research on the avian gut microbiota.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10477782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104777822023-09-06 16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles from diverse avian faeces are largely independent of DNA preservation and extraction method Edwards, Johnson Hoffbeck, Carmen West, Annie G. Pas, An Taylor, Michael W. Front Microbiol Microbiology The avian gut microbiota has been the subject of considerable recent attention, with potential implications for diverse fields such as the poultry industry, microbial ecology, and conservation. Faecal microbiotas are frequently used as a non-invasive proxy for the gut microbiota, however the extraction of high-quality microbial DNA from avian faeces has often proven challenging. Here we aimed to evaluate the performance of two DNA preservation methods (95% ethanol and RNAlater) and five extraction approaches (IndiSpin Pathogen Kit, QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit, MicroGEM PrepGEM Bacteria Kit, ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit, and an in-house phase separation-based method) for studying the avian gut microbiota. Systematic testing of the efficacy of these approaches on faecal samples from an initial three avian species (chicken, ostrich, and the flightless parrot kākāpō) revealed substantial differences in the quality, quantity and integrity of extracted DNA, but negligible influence of applied method on 16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles. Subsequent testing with a selected combination of preservation and extraction method on 10 further phylogenetically and ecologically diverse avian species reiterated the efficacy of the chosen approach, with bacterial community structure clustering strongly by technical replicates for a given avian species. Our finding that marked differences in extraction efficacy do not appear to influence 16S rRNA gene-based bacterial community profiles provides an important foundation for ongoing research on the avian gut microbiota. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10477782/ /pubmed/37675430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1239167 Text en Copyright © 2023 Edwards, Hoffbeck, West, Pas and Taylor. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Edwards, Johnson
Hoffbeck, Carmen
West, Annie G.
Pas, An
Taylor, Michael W.
16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles from diverse avian faeces are largely independent of DNA preservation and extraction method
title 16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles from diverse avian faeces are largely independent of DNA preservation and extraction method
title_full 16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles from diverse avian faeces are largely independent of DNA preservation and extraction method
title_fullStr 16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles from diverse avian faeces are largely independent of DNA preservation and extraction method
title_full_unstemmed 16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles from diverse avian faeces are largely independent of DNA preservation and extraction method
title_short 16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles from diverse avian faeces are largely independent of DNA preservation and extraction method
title_sort 16s rrna gene-based microbiota profiles from diverse avian faeces are largely independent of dna preservation and extraction method
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10477782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37675430
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1239167
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardsjohnson 16srrnagenebasedmicrobiotaprofilesfromdiverseavianfaecesarelargelyindependentofdnapreservationandextractionmethod
AT hoffbeckcarmen 16srrnagenebasedmicrobiotaprofilesfromdiverseavianfaecesarelargelyindependentofdnapreservationandextractionmethod
AT westannieg 16srrnagenebasedmicrobiotaprofilesfromdiverseavianfaecesarelargelyindependentofdnapreservationandextractionmethod
AT pasan 16srrnagenebasedmicrobiotaprofilesfromdiverseavianfaecesarelargelyindependentofdnapreservationandextractionmethod
AT taylormichaelw 16srrnagenebasedmicrobiotaprofilesfromdiverseavianfaecesarelargelyindependentofdnapreservationandextractionmethod