Cargando…
16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles from diverse avian faeces are largely independent of DNA preservation and extraction method
The avian gut microbiota has been the subject of considerable recent attention, with potential implications for diverse fields such as the poultry industry, microbial ecology, and conservation. Faecal microbiotas are frequently used as a non-invasive proxy for the gut microbiota, however the extract...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10477782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37675430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1239167 |
_version_ | 1785101209057624064 |
---|---|
author | Edwards, Johnson Hoffbeck, Carmen West, Annie G. Pas, An Taylor, Michael W. |
author_facet | Edwards, Johnson Hoffbeck, Carmen West, Annie G. Pas, An Taylor, Michael W. |
author_sort | Edwards, Johnson |
collection | PubMed |
description | The avian gut microbiota has been the subject of considerable recent attention, with potential implications for diverse fields such as the poultry industry, microbial ecology, and conservation. Faecal microbiotas are frequently used as a non-invasive proxy for the gut microbiota, however the extraction of high-quality microbial DNA from avian faeces has often proven challenging. Here we aimed to evaluate the performance of two DNA preservation methods (95% ethanol and RNAlater) and five extraction approaches (IndiSpin Pathogen Kit, QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit, MicroGEM PrepGEM Bacteria Kit, ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit, and an in-house phase separation-based method) for studying the avian gut microbiota. Systematic testing of the efficacy of these approaches on faecal samples from an initial three avian species (chicken, ostrich, and the flightless parrot kākāpō) revealed substantial differences in the quality, quantity and integrity of extracted DNA, but negligible influence of applied method on 16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles. Subsequent testing with a selected combination of preservation and extraction method on 10 further phylogenetically and ecologically diverse avian species reiterated the efficacy of the chosen approach, with bacterial community structure clustering strongly by technical replicates for a given avian species. Our finding that marked differences in extraction efficacy do not appear to influence 16S rRNA gene-based bacterial community profiles provides an important foundation for ongoing research on the avian gut microbiota. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10477782 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104777822023-09-06 16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles from diverse avian faeces are largely independent of DNA preservation and extraction method Edwards, Johnson Hoffbeck, Carmen West, Annie G. Pas, An Taylor, Michael W. Front Microbiol Microbiology The avian gut microbiota has been the subject of considerable recent attention, with potential implications for diverse fields such as the poultry industry, microbial ecology, and conservation. Faecal microbiotas are frequently used as a non-invasive proxy for the gut microbiota, however the extraction of high-quality microbial DNA from avian faeces has often proven challenging. Here we aimed to evaluate the performance of two DNA preservation methods (95% ethanol and RNAlater) and five extraction approaches (IndiSpin Pathogen Kit, QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit, MicroGEM PrepGEM Bacteria Kit, ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit, and an in-house phase separation-based method) for studying the avian gut microbiota. Systematic testing of the efficacy of these approaches on faecal samples from an initial three avian species (chicken, ostrich, and the flightless parrot kākāpō) revealed substantial differences in the quality, quantity and integrity of extracted DNA, but negligible influence of applied method on 16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles. Subsequent testing with a selected combination of preservation and extraction method on 10 further phylogenetically and ecologically diverse avian species reiterated the efficacy of the chosen approach, with bacterial community structure clustering strongly by technical replicates for a given avian species. Our finding that marked differences in extraction efficacy do not appear to influence 16S rRNA gene-based bacterial community profiles provides an important foundation for ongoing research on the avian gut microbiota. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10477782/ /pubmed/37675430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1239167 Text en Copyright © 2023 Edwards, Hoffbeck, West, Pas and Taylor. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Edwards, Johnson Hoffbeck, Carmen West, Annie G. Pas, An Taylor, Michael W. 16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles from diverse avian faeces are largely independent of DNA preservation and extraction method |
title | 16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles from diverse avian faeces are largely independent of DNA preservation and extraction method |
title_full | 16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles from diverse avian faeces are largely independent of DNA preservation and extraction method |
title_fullStr | 16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles from diverse avian faeces are largely independent of DNA preservation and extraction method |
title_full_unstemmed | 16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles from diverse avian faeces are largely independent of DNA preservation and extraction method |
title_short | 16S rRNA gene-based microbiota profiles from diverse avian faeces are largely independent of DNA preservation and extraction method |
title_sort | 16s rrna gene-based microbiota profiles from diverse avian faeces are largely independent of dna preservation and extraction method |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10477782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37675430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1239167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edwardsjohnson 16srrnagenebasedmicrobiotaprofilesfromdiverseavianfaecesarelargelyindependentofdnapreservationandextractionmethod AT hoffbeckcarmen 16srrnagenebasedmicrobiotaprofilesfromdiverseavianfaecesarelargelyindependentofdnapreservationandextractionmethod AT westannieg 16srrnagenebasedmicrobiotaprofilesfromdiverseavianfaecesarelargelyindependentofdnapreservationandextractionmethod AT pasan 16srrnagenebasedmicrobiotaprofilesfromdiverseavianfaecesarelargelyindependentofdnapreservationandextractionmethod AT taylormichaelw 16srrnagenebasedmicrobiotaprofilesfromdiverseavianfaecesarelargelyindependentofdnapreservationandextractionmethod |