Cargando…

Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: Efficacy studies show early nutrition interventions improving infant nutrition status, but understanding caregiver acceptability is required for implementation of such interventions. This systematic review examines caregivers’ perceptions of nutrition interventions in young children. DESI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stelle, Isabella, Kinshella, Mai-Lei Woo, Moore, Sophie E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37349869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980023001246
_version_ 1785101264591257600
author Stelle, Isabella
Kinshella, Mai-Lei Woo
Moore, Sophie E
author_facet Stelle, Isabella
Kinshella, Mai-Lei Woo
Moore, Sophie E
author_sort Stelle, Isabella
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Efficacy studies show early nutrition interventions improving infant nutrition status, but understanding caregiver acceptability is required for implementation of such interventions. This systematic review examines caregivers’ perceptions of nutrition interventions in young children. DESIGN: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO from date of online journal inception through December 2020. Interventions included oral (powder/liquid/tablet) and/or intravenous supplementation, food fortification and nutrition counselling. Inclusion criteria included primary research, data presented on caregiver perception and studies published in English. Quality assessment was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Studies underwent narrative synthesis using inductive thematic analysis. SETTING: No restriction. PARTICIPANTS: Caregivers of children under 24 months of age. RESULTS: Of 11 798 records identified, thirty-seven publications were included. Interventions included oral supplementation, food fortification and nutrition counselling. Caregivers included mothers (83 %), fathers, grandparents and aunts. Perceptions were gathered through individual interviews, focus group discussions, questionnaires, surveys and ratings. Totally, 89 % of studies noted high acceptability (n 33 most notably increased appetite (n 17). In total, 57 % of studies (n 21) cited low acceptability, commonly from side effects (n 13) such as gastrointestinal issues, appetite loss and stained teeth. CONCLUSIONS: Positive perceptions and enthusiasm for interventions were frequently reported. Key to implementation was the increased appetite noted by caregivers. A substantial proportion of studies reported negative perceptions, mainly due to side effects. In future interventions, mitigation and education around common side effects are crucial for acceptability. Understanding both positive and negative caregiver perceptions is important for informing future nutrition interventions and strengthening sustainability and implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10478058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104780582023-10-10 Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review Stelle, Isabella Kinshella, Mai-Lei Woo Moore, Sophie E Public Health Nutr Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: Efficacy studies show early nutrition interventions improving infant nutrition status, but understanding caregiver acceptability is required for implementation of such interventions. This systematic review examines caregivers’ perceptions of nutrition interventions in young children. DESIGN: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO from date of online journal inception through December 2020. Interventions included oral (powder/liquid/tablet) and/or intravenous supplementation, food fortification and nutrition counselling. Inclusion criteria included primary research, data presented on caregiver perception and studies published in English. Quality assessment was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Studies underwent narrative synthesis using inductive thematic analysis. SETTING: No restriction. PARTICIPANTS: Caregivers of children under 24 months of age. RESULTS: Of 11 798 records identified, thirty-seven publications were included. Interventions included oral supplementation, food fortification and nutrition counselling. Caregivers included mothers (83 %), fathers, grandparents and aunts. Perceptions were gathered through individual interviews, focus group discussions, questionnaires, surveys and ratings. Totally, 89 % of studies noted high acceptability (n 33 most notably increased appetite (n 17). In total, 57 % of studies (n 21) cited low acceptability, commonly from side effects (n 13) such as gastrointestinal issues, appetite loss and stained teeth. CONCLUSIONS: Positive perceptions and enthusiasm for interventions were frequently reported. Key to implementation was the increased appetite noted by caregivers. A substantial proportion of studies reported negative perceptions, mainly due to side effects. In future interventions, mitigation and education around common side effects are crucial for acceptability. Understanding both positive and negative caregiver perceptions is important for informing future nutrition interventions and strengthening sustainability and implementation. Cambridge University Press 2023-09 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10478058/ /pubmed/37349869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980023001246 Text en © The Authors 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Stelle, Isabella
Kinshella, Mai-Lei Woo
Moore, Sophie E
Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review
title Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review
title_full Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review
title_fullStr Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review
title_short Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review
title_sort caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37349869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980023001246
work_keys_str_mv AT stelleisabella caregiverperceptionsofnutritioninterventionsininfantsandchildrenunder24monthsofageasystematicreview
AT kinshellamaileiwoo caregiverperceptionsofnutritioninterventionsininfantsandchildrenunder24monthsofageasystematicreview
AT mooresophiee caregiverperceptionsofnutritioninterventionsininfantsandchildrenunder24monthsofageasystematicreview