Cargando…
Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review
OBJECTIVE: Efficacy studies show early nutrition interventions improving infant nutrition status, but understanding caregiver acceptability is required for implementation of such interventions. This systematic review examines caregivers’ perceptions of nutrition interventions in young children. DESI...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37349869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980023001246 |
_version_ | 1785101264591257600 |
---|---|
author | Stelle, Isabella Kinshella, Mai-Lei Woo Moore, Sophie E |
author_facet | Stelle, Isabella Kinshella, Mai-Lei Woo Moore, Sophie E |
author_sort | Stelle, Isabella |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Efficacy studies show early nutrition interventions improving infant nutrition status, but understanding caregiver acceptability is required for implementation of such interventions. This systematic review examines caregivers’ perceptions of nutrition interventions in young children. DESIGN: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO from date of online journal inception through December 2020. Interventions included oral (powder/liquid/tablet) and/or intravenous supplementation, food fortification and nutrition counselling. Inclusion criteria included primary research, data presented on caregiver perception and studies published in English. Quality assessment was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Studies underwent narrative synthesis using inductive thematic analysis. SETTING: No restriction. PARTICIPANTS: Caregivers of children under 24 months of age. RESULTS: Of 11 798 records identified, thirty-seven publications were included. Interventions included oral supplementation, food fortification and nutrition counselling. Caregivers included mothers (83 %), fathers, grandparents and aunts. Perceptions were gathered through individual interviews, focus group discussions, questionnaires, surveys and ratings. Totally, 89 % of studies noted high acceptability (n 33 most notably increased appetite (n 17). In total, 57 % of studies (n 21) cited low acceptability, commonly from side effects (n 13) such as gastrointestinal issues, appetite loss and stained teeth. CONCLUSIONS: Positive perceptions and enthusiasm for interventions were frequently reported. Key to implementation was the increased appetite noted by caregivers. A substantial proportion of studies reported negative perceptions, mainly due to side effects. In future interventions, mitigation and education around common side effects are crucial for acceptability. Understanding both positive and negative caregiver perceptions is important for informing future nutrition interventions and strengthening sustainability and implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10478058 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104780582023-10-10 Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review Stelle, Isabella Kinshella, Mai-Lei Woo Moore, Sophie E Public Health Nutr Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: Efficacy studies show early nutrition interventions improving infant nutrition status, but understanding caregiver acceptability is required for implementation of such interventions. This systematic review examines caregivers’ perceptions of nutrition interventions in young children. DESIGN: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO from date of online journal inception through December 2020. Interventions included oral (powder/liquid/tablet) and/or intravenous supplementation, food fortification and nutrition counselling. Inclusion criteria included primary research, data presented on caregiver perception and studies published in English. Quality assessment was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Studies underwent narrative synthesis using inductive thematic analysis. SETTING: No restriction. PARTICIPANTS: Caregivers of children under 24 months of age. RESULTS: Of 11 798 records identified, thirty-seven publications were included. Interventions included oral supplementation, food fortification and nutrition counselling. Caregivers included mothers (83 %), fathers, grandparents and aunts. Perceptions were gathered through individual interviews, focus group discussions, questionnaires, surveys and ratings. Totally, 89 % of studies noted high acceptability (n 33 most notably increased appetite (n 17). In total, 57 % of studies (n 21) cited low acceptability, commonly from side effects (n 13) such as gastrointestinal issues, appetite loss and stained teeth. CONCLUSIONS: Positive perceptions and enthusiasm for interventions were frequently reported. Key to implementation was the increased appetite noted by caregivers. A substantial proportion of studies reported negative perceptions, mainly due to side effects. In future interventions, mitigation and education around common side effects are crucial for acceptability. Understanding both positive and negative caregiver perceptions is important for informing future nutrition interventions and strengthening sustainability and implementation. Cambridge University Press 2023-09 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10478058/ /pubmed/37349869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980023001246 Text en © The Authors 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Stelle, Isabella Kinshella, Mai-Lei Woo Moore, Sophie E Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review |
title | Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review |
title_full | Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review |
title_short | Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review |
title_sort | caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37349869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980023001246 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stelleisabella caregiverperceptionsofnutritioninterventionsininfantsandchildrenunder24monthsofageasystematicreview AT kinshellamaileiwoo caregiverperceptionsofnutritioninterventionsininfantsandchildrenunder24monthsofageasystematicreview AT mooresophiee caregiverperceptionsofnutritioninterventionsininfantsandchildrenunder24monthsofageasystematicreview |