Cargando…

Temblor esencial: ¿el gato tiene cinco pies? Síntomas no motores y temblor esencial plus

INTRODUCTION. The existence of non-motor symptoms in essential tremor (ET) and the appearance of a new condition, ET-plus, are two controversial issues. AIMS. To offer a review of the current status of these two topics. DEVELOPMENT. We performed an analysis of the studies conducted on non-motor symp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gironell, Alexandre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Viguera Editores (Evidenze Group) 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37303101
http://dx.doi.org/10.33588/rn.7612.2023083
_version_ 1785101278373740544
author Gironell, Alexandre
author_facet Gironell, Alexandre
author_sort Gironell, Alexandre
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION. The existence of non-motor symptoms in essential tremor (ET) and the appearance of a new condition, ET-plus, are two controversial issues. AIMS. To offer a review of the current status of these two topics. DEVELOPMENT. We performed an analysis of the studies conducted on non-motor symptoms in ET and of the articles for and against the use of the term ET-plus. CONCLUSIONS. Non-motor symptoms have gained increased recognition as a feature accompanying ET. Several studies have documented its presence compared to matched controls. It is not clear, however, whether these non-motor symptoms would be part of the spectrum of ET symptoms (a primary phenomenon) or whether they would be symptoms that appear as a consequence of the physical or psychological disability produced by the clinical signs and symptoms of ET itself (a secondary phenomenon). For the time being, their evaluation and treatment are not included within the standard assessment of patients with ET. In view of the heterogeneous phenotype, the term ET-plus aims to improve phenotypic homogeneity for genetic or therapeutic studies. Yet, there is no pathological basis, and epidemiological, genetic and therapeutic research studies have numerous drawbacks. In the absence of clear objective biomarkers, distinguishing between ET and ET-plus by clinical distinction alone is very complex. We should be cautious about using new terms that are not yet backed by sound scientific evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10478120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Viguera Editores (Evidenze Group)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104781202023-09-06 Temblor esencial: ¿el gato tiene cinco pies? Síntomas no motores y temblor esencial plus Gironell, Alexandre Rev Neurol Revisión INTRODUCTION. The existence of non-motor symptoms in essential tremor (ET) and the appearance of a new condition, ET-plus, are two controversial issues. AIMS. To offer a review of the current status of these two topics. DEVELOPMENT. We performed an analysis of the studies conducted on non-motor symptoms in ET and of the articles for and against the use of the term ET-plus. CONCLUSIONS. Non-motor symptoms have gained increased recognition as a feature accompanying ET. Several studies have documented its presence compared to matched controls. It is not clear, however, whether these non-motor symptoms would be part of the spectrum of ET symptoms (a primary phenomenon) or whether they would be symptoms that appear as a consequence of the physical or psychological disability produced by the clinical signs and symptoms of ET itself (a secondary phenomenon). For the time being, their evaluation and treatment are not included within the standard assessment of patients with ET. In view of the heterogeneous phenotype, the term ET-plus aims to improve phenotypic homogeneity for genetic or therapeutic studies. Yet, there is no pathological basis, and epidemiological, genetic and therapeutic research studies have numerous drawbacks. In the absence of clear objective biomarkers, distinguishing between ET and ET-plus by clinical distinction alone is very complex. We should be cautious about using new terms that are not yet backed by sound scientific evidence. Viguera Editores (Evidenze Group) 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10478120/ /pubmed/37303101 http://dx.doi.org/10.33588/rn.7612.2023083 Text en Copyright: © Revista de Neurología https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Revista de Neurología trabaja bajo una licencia Creative Commons
spellingShingle Revisión
Gironell, Alexandre
Temblor esencial: ¿el gato tiene cinco pies? Síntomas no motores y temblor esencial plus
title Temblor esencial: ¿el gato tiene cinco pies? Síntomas no motores y temblor esencial plus
title_full Temblor esencial: ¿el gato tiene cinco pies? Síntomas no motores y temblor esencial plus
title_fullStr Temblor esencial: ¿el gato tiene cinco pies? Síntomas no motores y temblor esencial plus
title_full_unstemmed Temblor esencial: ¿el gato tiene cinco pies? Síntomas no motores y temblor esencial plus
title_short Temblor esencial: ¿el gato tiene cinco pies? Síntomas no motores y temblor esencial plus
title_sort temblor esencial: ¿el gato tiene cinco pies? síntomas no motores y temblor esencial plus
topic Revisión
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37303101
http://dx.doi.org/10.33588/rn.7612.2023083
work_keys_str_mv AT gironellalexandre tembloresencialelgatotienecincopiessintomasnomotoresytembloresencialplus