Cargando…

Comparison of the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation on endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation: a parallel randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are prevalent interventions in the operating room and intensive care unit. Recently, the complications of endotracheal tube cuff pressure have been a topic of interest. Therefore, this study compared the effect of pressure control and vo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nasrolahzadeh, Shahram, Nourian, Javad, Khosravi, Ahmad, Ghasempour, Saeed, Abbasi, Ali, Ebrahimi, Hossein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37670235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02263-1
_version_ 1785101289758130176
author Nasrolahzadeh, Shahram
Nourian, Javad
Khosravi, Ahmad
Ghasempour, Saeed
Abbasi, Ali
Ebrahimi, Hossein
author_facet Nasrolahzadeh, Shahram
Nourian, Javad
Khosravi, Ahmad
Ghasempour, Saeed
Abbasi, Ali
Ebrahimi, Hossein
author_sort Nasrolahzadeh, Shahram
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are prevalent interventions in the operating room and intensive care unit. Recently, the complications of endotracheal tube cuff pressure have been a topic of interest. Therefore, this study compared the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation modes on the endotracheal cuff pressure rate in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation. METHODS: In this triple-blinded randomized clinical trial, 50 patients undergoing open limb surgery and inguinal hernia were allocated to two groups of 25 based on inclusion criteria. After intubation, one group underwent ventilation on the pressure control ventilation mode, and the other underwent ventilation on the volume control ventilation mode. In both groups, using a manometer, the cuff’s pressure was first adjusted in the range of 25–30 cm of water. Then, the cuff pressure was measured at 10, 20, and 30 min intervals. The data were statistically analyzed using independent t-test, and two-way repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: The present study’s findings showed that cuff pressure has significantly decreased over time in both study groups (F = 117.7, P < 0.001). However, a repeated measures ANOVA with a Greenhouse-Geisser correction showed no interaction between time and groups (F = 0.019, P = 0.98). The two groups had no significant difference in cuff pressure (F = 0.56, P = 0.458). CONCLUSION: Since the cuff pressure has been significantly reduced in both groups over time, continuous monitoring of endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation is essential. Therefore, it is suggested to keep the cuff pressure within the recommended range to prevent complications resulting from cuff pressure reduction, such as aspiration and ventilation decrease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trial on 23/02/2019 (trial registration number: IRCT20181018041376N1).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10478180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104781802023-09-06 Comparison of the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation on endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation: a parallel randomized clinical trial Nasrolahzadeh, Shahram Nourian, Javad Khosravi, Ahmad Ghasempour, Saeed Abbasi, Ali Ebrahimi, Hossein BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are prevalent interventions in the operating room and intensive care unit. Recently, the complications of endotracheal tube cuff pressure have been a topic of interest. Therefore, this study compared the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation modes on the endotracheal cuff pressure rate in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation. METHODS: In this triple-blinded randomized clinical trial, 50 patients undergoing open limb surgery and inguinal hernia were allocated to two groups of 25 based on inclusion criteria. After intubation, one group underwent ventilation on the pressure control ventilation mode, and the other underwent ventilation on the volume control ventilation mode. In both groups, using a manometer, the cuff’s pressure was first adjusted in the range of 25–30 cm of water. Then, the cuff pressure was measured at 10, 20, and 30 min intervals. The data were statistically analyzed using independent t-test, and two-way repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: The present study’s findings showed that cuff pressure has significantly decreased over time in both study groups (F = 117.7, P < 0.001). However, a repeated measures ANOVA with a Greenhouse-Geisser correction showed no interaction between time and groups (F = 0.019, P = 0.98). The two groups had no significant difference in cuff pressure (F = 0.56, P = 0.458). CONCLUSION: Since the cuff pressure has been significantly reduced in both groups over time, continuous monitoring of endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation is essential. Therefore, it is suggested to keep the cuff pressure within the recommended range to prevent complications resulting from cuff pressure reduction, such as aspiration and ventilation decrease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trial on 23/02/2019 (trial registration number: IRCT20181018041376N1). BioMed Central 2023-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10478180/ /pubmed/37670235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02263-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Nasrolahzadeh, Shahram
Nourian, Javad
Khosravi, Ahmad
Ghasempour, Saeed
Abbasi, Ali
Ebrahimi, Hossein
Comparison of the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation on endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation: a parallel randomized clinical trial
title Comparison of the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation on endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation: a parallel randomized clinical trial
title_full Comparison of the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation on endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation: a parallel randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation on endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation: a parallel randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation on endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation: a parallel randomized clinical trial
title_short Comparison of the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation on endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation: a parallel randomized clinical trial
title_sort comparison of the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation on endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation: a parallel randomized clinical trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37670235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02263-1
work_keys_str_mv AT nasrolahzadehshahram comparisonoftheeffectofpressurecontrolandvolumecontrolventilationonendotrachealtubecuffpressureinpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesiaandmechanicalventilationaparallelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT nourianjavad comparisonoftheeffectofpressurecontrolandvolumecontrolventilationonendotrachealtubecuffpressureinpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesiaandmechanicalventilationaparallelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT khosraviahmad comparisonoftheeffectofpressurecontrolandvolumecontrolventilationonendotrachealtubecuffpressureinpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesiaandmechanicalventilationaparallelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ghasempoursaeed comparisonoftheeffectofpressurecontrolandvolumecontrolventilationonendotrachealtubecuffpressureinpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesiaandmechanicalventilationaparallelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT abbasiali comparisonoftheeffectofpressurecontrolandvolumecontrolventilationonendotrachealtubecuffpressureinpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesiaandmechanicalventilationaparallelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ebrahimihossein comparisonoftheeffectofpressurecontrolandvolumecontrolventilationonendotrachealtubecuffpressureinpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesiaandmechanicalventilationaparallelrandomizedclinicaltrial