Cargando…
Influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention
BACKGROUND: Failures in glass fiber post (GFP) retention may be associated with low adhesion achieved in root dentin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 55 single-rooted premolars were endodontically treated and distributed according to different adhesion strategies (n=11): G1: RelyX ARC (3M ESPE; etch-rinse str...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37674597 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.60452 |
_version_ | 1785101292424658944 |
---|---|
author | Nadler, Ana-Michelle-Oliveira da Silva, Evair-Josino Lins-Filho, Paulo-Cardoso Dias, Marlon-Ferreira Guimarães, Renata-Pedrosa da Silva, Claudio-Heliomar-Vicente Silva, Sérgio-dos Santos Gomes, Anderson-Stevens-Leonidas |
author_facet | Nadler, Ana-Michelle-Oliveira da Silva, Evair-Josino Lins-Filho, Paulo-Cardoso Dias, Marlon-Ferreira Guimarães, Renata-Pedrosa da Silva, Claudio-Heliomar-Vicente Silva, Sérgio-dos Santos Gomes, Anderson-Stevens-Leonidas |
author_sort | Nadler, Ana-Michelle-Oliveira |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Failures in glass fiber post (GFP) retention may be associated with low adhesion achieved in root dentin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 55 single-rooted premolars were endodontically treated and distributed according to different adhesion strategies (n=11): G1: RelyX ARC (3M ESPE; etch-rinse strategy); G2: Relyx Ultimate (3M ESPE; etch-rinse strategy); G3: AllCem (FGM; etch-rinse strategy); G4: Relyx Ultimate (3M ESPE; self-etching strategy); G5: RelyX U200 (3M ESPE; self-adhesive strategy). For Bonding Strength (BS) analysis, the roots were sectioned in slices (1.0mm thickness) corresponding to each root third and submitted to push-out test. The type of failure was assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: The highest BS averages were found in G2 and G3. However, in the middle and apical root thirds, G3 showed statistically similar results to G4 and G5. In the cervical and middle third, G1 was statistically similar to G4 and G5. The mixed type of failure was the most common in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Self-etching (G4) and self-adhesive resin (G5) cements, showed similar BS results of immediate bonding in the cementation of GFP compared to conventional resin cements (G1, G2, G3). Key words:Dental Cements, Dentin-Bonding Agents, Post and Core Technique, Dental Bonding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10478191 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104781912023-09-06 Influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention Nadler, Ana-Michelle-Oliveira da Silva, Evair-Josino Lins-Filho, Paulo-Cardoso Dias, Marlon-Ferreira Guimarães, Renata-Pedrosa da Silva, Claudio-Heliomar-Vicente Silva, Sérgio-dos Santos Gomes, Anderson-Stevens-Leonidas J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: Failures in glass fiber post (GFP) retention may be associated with low adhesion achieved in root dentin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 55 single-rooted premolars were endodontically treated and distributed according to different adhesion strategies (n=11): G1: RelyX ARC (3M ESPE; etch-rinse strategy); G2: Relyx Ultimate (3M ESPE; etch-rinse strategy); G3: AllCem (FGM; etch-rinse strategy); G4: Relyx Ultimate (3M ESPE; self-etching strategy); G5: RelyX U200 (3M ESPE; self-adhesive strategy). For Bonding Strength (BS) analysis, the roots were sectioned in slices (1.0mm thickness) corresponding to each root third and submitted to push-out test. The type of failure was assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: The highest BS averages were found in G2 and G3. However, in the middle and apical root thirds, G3 showed statistically similar results to G4 and G5. In the cervical and middle third, G1 was statistically similar to G4 and G5. The mixed type of failure was the most common in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Self-etching (G4) and self-adhesive resin (G5) cements, showed similar BS results of immediate bonding in the cementation of GFP compared to conventional resin cements (G1, G2, G3). Key words:Dental Cements, Dentin-Bonding Agents, Post and Core Technique, Dental Bonding. Medicina Oral S.L. 2023-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10478191/ /pubmed/37674597 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.60452 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Medicina Oral S.L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Nadler, Ana-Michelle-Oliveira da Silva, Evair-Josino Lins-Filho, Paulo-Cardoso Dias, Marlon-Ferreira Guimarães, Renata-Pedrosa da Silva, Claudio-Heliomar-Vicente Silva, Sérgio-dos Santos Gomes, Anderson-Stevens-Leonidas Influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention |
title | Influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention |
title_full | Influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention |
title_fullStr | Influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention |
title_short | Influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention |
title_sort | influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37674597 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.60452 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nadleranamichelleoliveira influenceofdifferentadhesionstrategiesonglassfiberpostretention AT dasilvaevairjosino influenceofdifferentadhesionstrategiesonglassfiberpostretention AT linsfilhopaulocardoso influenceofdifferentadhesionstrategiesonglassfiberpostretention AT diasmarlonferreira influenceofdifferentadhesionstrategiesonglassfiberpostretention AT guimaraesrenatapedrosa influenceofdifferentadhesionstrategiesonglassfiberpostretention AT dasilvaclaudioheliomarvicente influenceofdifferentadhesionstrategiesonglassfiberpostretention AT silvasergiodossantos influenceofdifferentadhesionstrategiesonglassfiberpostretention AT gomesandersonstevensleonidas influenceofdifferentadhesionstrategiesonglassfiberpostretention |