Cargando…

Influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention

BACKGROUND: Failures in glass fiber post (GFP) retention may be associated with low adhesion achieved in root dentin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 55 single-rooted premolars were endodontically treated and distributed according to different adhesion strategies (n=11): G1: RelyX ARC (3M ESPE; etch-rinse str...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nadler, Ana-Michelle-Oliveira, da Silva, Evair-Josino, Lins-Filho, Paulo-Cardoso, Dias, Marlon-Ferreira, Guimarães, Renata-Pedrosa, da Silva, Claudio-Heliomar-Vicente, Silva, Sérgio-dos Santos, Gomes, Anderson-Stevens-Leonidas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37674597
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.60452
_version_ 1785101292424658944
author Nadler, Ana-Michelle-Oliveira
da Silva, Evair-Josino
Lins-Filho, Paulo-Cardoso
Dias, Marlon-Ferreira
Guimarães, Renata-Pedrosa
da Silva, Claudio-Heliomar-Vicente
Silva, Sérgio-dos Santos
Gomes, Anderson-Stevens-Leonidas
author_facet Nadler, Ana-Michelle-Oliveira
da Silva, Evair-Josino
Lins-Filho, Paulo-Cardoso
Dias, Marlon-Ferreira
Guimarães, Renata-Pedrosa
da Silva, Claudio-Heliomar-Vicente
Silva, Sérgio-dos Santos
Gomes, Anderson-Stevens-Leonidas
author_sort Nadler, Ana-Michelle-Oliveira
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Failures in glass fiber post (GFP) retention may be associated with low adhesion achieved in root dentin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 55 single-rooted premolars were endodontically treated and distributed according to different adhesion strategies (n=11): G1: RelyX ARC (3M ESPE; etch-rinse strategy); G2: Relyx Ultimate (3M ESPE; etch-rinse strategy); G3: AllCem (FGM; etch-rinse strategy); G4: Relyx Ultimate (3M ESPE; self-etching strategy); G5: RelyX U200 (3M ESPE; self-adhesive strategy). For Bonding Strength (BS) analysis, the roots were sectioned in slices (1.0mm thickness) corresponding to each root third and submitted to push-out test. The type of failure was assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: The highest BS averages were found in G2 and G3. However, in the middle and apical root thirds, G3 showed statistically similar results to G4 and G5. In the cervical and middle third, G1 was statistically similar to G4 and G5. The mixed type of failure was the most common in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Self-etching (G4) and self-adhesive resin (G5) cements, showed similar BS results of immediate bonding in the cementation of GFP compared to conventional resin cements (G1, G2, G3). Key words:Dental Cements, Dentin-Bonding Agents, Post and Core Technique, Dental Bonding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10478191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104781912023-09-06 Influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention Nadler, Ana-Michelle-Oliveira da Silva, Evair-Josino Lins-Filho, Paulo-Cardoso Dias, Marlon-Ferreira Guimarães, Renata-Pedrosa da Silva, Claudio-Heliomar-Vicente Silva, Sérgio-dos Santos Gomes, Anderson-Stevens-Leonidas J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: Failures in glass fiber post (GFP) retention may be associated with low adhesion achieved in root dentin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 55 single-rooted premolars were endodontically treated and distributed according to different adhesion strategies (n=11): G1: RelyX ARC (3M ESPE; etch-rinse strategy); G2: Relyx Ultimate (3M ESPE; etch-rinse strategy); G3: AllCem (FGM; etch-rinse strategy); G4: Relyx Ultimate (3M ESPE; self-etching strategy); G5: RelyX U200 (3M ESPE; self-adhesive strategy). For Bonding Strength (BS) analysis, the roots were sectioned in slices (1.0mm thickness) corresponding to each root third and submitted to push-out test. The type of failure was assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: The highest BS averages were found in G2 and G3. However, in the middle and apical root thirds, G3 showed statistically similar results to G4 and G5. In the cervical and middle third, G1 was statistically similar to G4 and G5. The mixed type of failure was the most common in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Self-etching (G4) and self-adhesive resin (G5) cements, showed similar BS results of immediate bonding in the cementation of GFP compared to conventional resin cements (G1, G2, G3). Key words:Dental Cements, Dentin-Bonding Agents, Post and Core Technique, Dental Bonding. Medicina Oral S.L. 2023-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10478191/ /pubmed/37674597 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.60452 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Medicina Oral S.L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Nadler, Ana-Michelle-Oliveira
da Silva, Evair-Josino
Lins-Filho, Paulo-Cardoso
Dias, Marlon-Ferreira
Guimarães, Renata-Pedrosa
da Silva, Claudio-Heliomar-Vicente
Silva, Sérgio-dos Santos
Gomes, Anderson-Stevens-Leonidas
Influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention
title Influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention
title_full Influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention
title_fullStr Influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention
title_full_unstemmed Influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention
title_short Influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention
title_sort influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37674597
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.60452
work_keys_str_mv AT nadleranamichelleoliveira influenceofdifferentadhesionstrategiesonglassfiberpostretention
AT dasilvaevairjosino influenceofdifferentadhesionstrategiesonglassfiberpostretention
AT linsfilhopaulocardoso influenceofdifferentadhesionstrategiesonglassfiberpostretention
AT diasmarlonferreira influenceofdifferentadhesionstrategiesonglassfiberpostretention
AT guimaraesrenatapedrosa influenceofdifferentadhesionstrategiesonglassfiberpostretention
AT dasilvaclaudioheliomarvicente influenceofdifferentadhesionstrategiesonglassfiberpostretention
AT silvasergiodossantos influenceofdifferentadhesionstrategiesonglassfiberpostretention
AT gomesandersonstevensleonidas influenceofdifferentadhesionstrategiesonglassfiberpostretention