Cargando…
Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention studies in periodontology using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews of intervention studies are used to support treatment recommendations. The aim of this study was to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias of systematic reviews of intervention studies in in the field of periodontology using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS. MATERIAL AND...
Autores principales: | Pereira, Alexandre-Godinho, Martins, Carolina-Castro, Campos, Julya-Ribeiro, Faria, Sandro-Felipe-Santos, Notaro, Sarah-Queiroz, Poklepović-Peričić, Tina, Costa, Lidiane-Cristina-Machado, Costa, Fernando-Oliveira, Cota, Luís-Otávio-Miranda |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37674600 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.60197 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study
por: Gates, Allison, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
A comparison of two assessment tools used in overviews of systematic reviews: ROBIS versus AMSTAR-2
por: Perry, R., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
An overview of systematic reviews of complementary and alternative therapies for fibromyalgia using both AMSTAR and ROBIS as quality assessment tools
por: Perry, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews
por: Swierz, Mateusz J., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Alfred Watkis Roby Fletcher
Publicado: (1898)