Cargando…

Oncologic relevance of genetic alterations in sporadic synchronous and solitary colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND: Oncologic impact of genetic alteration across synchronous colorectal cancer (CRC) still remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the oncologic relevance according to genetic alteration between synchronous and solitary CRC with performing systematic review. METHODS: Multicenter retros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Son, Il Tae, Kim, Minsung, Oh, Bo Young, Kim, Min Jeong, Yoon, Sang Nam, Park, Jun Ho, Kim, Byung Chun, Kim, Jong Wan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02937-7
_version_ 1785101317411176448
author Son, Il Tae
Kim, Minsung
Oh, Bo Young
Kim, Min Jeong
Yoon, Sang Nam
Park, Jun Ho
Kim, Byung Chun
Kim, Jong Wan
author_facet Son, Il Tae
Kim, Minsung
Oh, Bo Young
Kim, Min Jeong
Yoon, Sang Nam
Park, Jun Ho
Kim, Byung Chun
Kim, Jong Wan
author_sort Son, Il Tae
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oncologic impact of genetic alteration across synchronous colorectal cancer (CRC) still remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the oncologic relevance according to genetic alteration between synchronous and solitary CRC with performing systematic review. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective analysis was performed for CRC patients with curative resection. Genetic profiling was consisted of microsatellite instability (MSI) testing, RAS (K-ras, and N-ras), and BRAF (v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1) V600E mutation. Multivariate analyses were conducted using logistic regression for synchronicity, and Cox proportional hazard model with stage-adjusting for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: It was identified synchronous (n = 36) and solitary (n = 579) CRC with similar base line characteristics. RAS mutation was associated to synchronous CRC with no relations of MSI and BRAF. During median follow up of 77.8 month, Kaplan–meier curves showed significant differences according to MSI-high for OS, and in RAS, and BRAF mutation for DFS, respectively. In multivariable analyses, RAS and BRAF mutation were independent factors (RAS, HR = 1.808, 95% CI = 1.18–2.77, p = 0.007; BRAF, HR = 2.417, 95% CI = 1.32–4.41, p = 0.004). Old age was independent factor for OS (HR = 3.626, 95% CI = 1.09–12.00, p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: This study showed that oncologic outcomes might differ according to mutation burden characterized by RAS, BRAF, and MSI between synchronous CRC and solitary CRC. In addition, our systematic review highlighted a lack of data and much heterogeneity in genetic characteristics and survival outcomes of synchronous CRC relative to that of solitary CRC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10478293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104782932023-09-06 Oncologic relevance of genetic alterations in sporadic synchronous and solitary colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study Son, Il Tae Kim, Minsung Oh, Bo Young Kim, Min Jeong Yoon, Sang Nam Park, Jun Ho Kim, Byung Chun Kim, Jong Wan BMC Gastroenterol Research BACKGROUND: Oncologic impact of genetic alteration across synchronous colorectal cancer (CRC) still remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the oncologic relevance according to genetic alteration between synchronous and solitary CRC with performing systematic review. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective analysis was performed for CRC patients with curative resection. Genetic profiling was consisted of microsatellite instability (MSI) testing, RAS (K-ras, and N-ras), and BRAF (v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1) V600E mutation. Multivariate analyses were conducted using logistic regression for synchronicity, and Cox proportional hazard model with stage-adjusting for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: It was identified synchronous (n = 36) and solitary (n = 579) CRC with similar base line characteristics. RAS mutation was associated to synchronous CRC with no relations of MSI and BRAF. During median follow up of 77.8 month, Kaplan–meier curves showed significant differences according to MSI-high for OS, and in RAS, and BRAF mutation for DFS, respectively. In multivariable analyses, RAS and BRAF mutation were independent factors (RAS, HR = 1.808, 95% CI = 1.18–2.77, p = 0.007; BRAF, HR = 2.417, 95% CI = 1.32–4.41, p = 0.004). Old age was independent factor for OS (HR = 3.626, 95% CI = 1.09–12.00, p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: This study showed that oncologic outcomes might differ according to mutation burden characterized by RAS, BRAF, and MSI between synchronous CRC and solitary CRC. In addition, our systematic review highlighted a lack of data and much heterogeneity in genetic characteristics and survival outcomes of synchronous CRC relative to that of solitary CRC. BioMed Central 2023-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10478293/ /pubmed/37667167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02937-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Son, Il Tae
Kim, Minsung
Oh, Bo Young
Kim, Min Jeong
Yoon, Sang Nam
Park, Jun Ho
Kim, Byung Chun
Kim, Jong Wan
Oncologic relevance of genetic alterations in sporadic synchronous and solitary colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study
title Oncologic relevance of genetic alterations in sporadic synchronous and solitary colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study
title_full Oncologic relevance of genetic alterations in sporadic synchronous and solitary colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study
title_fullStr Oncologic relevance of genetic alterations in sporadic synchronous and solitary colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Oncologic relevance of genetic alterations in sporadic synchronous and solitary colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study
title_short Oncologic relevance of genetic alterations in sporadic synchronous and solitary colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study
title_sort oncologic relevance of genetic alterations in sporadic synchronous and solitary colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02937-7
work_keys_str_mv AT soniltae oncologicrelevanceofgeneticalterationsinsporadicsynchronousandsolitarycolorectalcanceraretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT kimminsung oncologicrelevanceofgeneticalterationsinsporadicsynchronousandsolitarycolorectalcanceraretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT ohboyoung oncologicrelevanceofgeneticalterationsinsporadicsynchronousandsolitarycolorectalcanceraretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT kimminjeong oncologicrelevanceofgeneticalterationsinsporadicsynchronousandsolitarycolorectalcanceraretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT yoonsangnam oncologicrelevanceofgeneticalterationsinsporadicsynchronousandsolitarycolorectalcanceraretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT parkjunho oncologicrelevanceofgeneticalterationsinsporadicsynchronousandsolitarycolorectalcanceraretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT kimbyungchun oncologicrelevanceofgeneticalterationsinsporadicsynchronousandsolitarycolorectalcanceraretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT kimjongwan oncologicrelevanceofgeneticalterationsinsporadicsynchronousandsolitarycolorectalcanceraretrospectivemulticenterstudy