Cargando…

A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop and validate a model based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in biopsy-naïve patients. METHOD: This retrospective study included 324 patients who underwent bpMRI and MRI targeted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Beibei, Zhang, Huili, Zhang, Yueyue, Jin, Yongming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-023-00606-2
_version_ 1785101320664907776
author Hu, Beibei
Zhang, Huili
Zhang, Yueyue
Jin, Yongming
author_facet Hu, Beibei
Zhang, Huili
Zhang, Yueyue
Jin, Yongming
author_sort Hu, Beibei
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop and validate a model based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in biopsy-naïve patients. METHOD: This retrospective study included 324 patients who underwent bpMRI and MRI targeted fusion biopsy (MRGB) and/or systematic biopsy, of them 217 were randomly assigned to the training group and 107 were assigned to the validation group. We assessed the diagnostic performance of three bpMRI-based scorings in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Subsequently, 3 models (Model 1, Model 2, and Model 3) combining bpMRI scorings with clinical variables were constructed and compared with each other using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC). The statistical significance of differences among these models was evaluated using DeLong’s test. RESULTS: In the training group, 68 of 217 patients had pathologically proven csPCa. The sensitivity and specificity for Scoring 1 were 64.7% (95% CI 52.2%-75.9%) and 80.5% (95% CI 73.3%-86.6%); for Scoring 2 were 86.8% (95% CI 76.4%-93.8%) and 73.2% (95% CI 65.3%-80.1%); and for Scoring 3 were 61.8% (95% CI 49.2%-73.3%) and 80.5% (95% CI 73.3%-86.6%), respectively. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that scorings based on bpMRI, age, and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) were independent predictors of csPCa. The AUCs for the 3 models were 0.88 (95% CI 0.83–0.93), 0.90 (95% CI 0.85–0.94), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.83–0.93), respectively. Model 2 showed significantly higher performance than Model 1 (P = 0.03) and Model 3 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: All three scorings had favorite diagnostic accuracy. While in conjunction with age and PSAD the prediction power was significantly improved, and the Model 2 that based on Scoring 2 yielded the highest performance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-023-00606-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10478308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104783082023-09-06 A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients Hu, Beibei Zhang, Huili Zhang, Yueyue Jin, Yongming Cancer Imaging Research Article PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop and validate a model based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in biopsy-naïve patients. METHOD: This retrospective study included 324 patients who underwent bpMRI and MRI targeted fusion biopsy (MRGB) and/or systematic biopsy, of them 217 were randomly assigned to the training group and 107 were assigned to the validation group. We assessed the diagnostic performance of three bpMRI-based scorings in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Subsequently, 3 models (Model 1, Model 2, and Model 3) combining bpMRI scorings with clinical variables were constructed and compared with each other using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC). The statistical significance of differences among these models was evaluated using DeLong’s test. RESULTS: In the training group, 68 of 217 patients had pathologically proven csPCa. The sensitivity and specificity for Scoring 1 were 64.7% (95% CI 52.2%-75.9%) and 80.5% (95% CI 73.3%-86.6%); for Scoring 2 were 86.8% (95% CI 76.4%-93.8%) and 73.2% (95% CI 65.3%-80.1%); and for Scoring 3 were 61.8% (95% CI 49.2%-73.3%) and 80.5% (95% CI 73.3%-86.6%), respectively. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that scorings based on bpMRI, age, and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) were independent predictors of csPCa. The AUCs for the 3 models were 0.88 (95% CI 0.83–0.93), 0.90 (95% CI 0.85–0.94), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.83–0.93), respectively. Model 2 showed significantly higher performance than Model 1 (P = 0.03) and Model 3 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: All three scorings had favorite diagnostic accuracy. While in conjunction with age and PSAD the prediction power was significantly improved, and the Model 2 that based on Scoring 2 yielded the highest performance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-023-00606-2. BioMed Central 2023-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10478308/ /pubmed/37667393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-023-00606-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hu, Beibei
Zhang, Huili
Zhang, Yueyue
Jin, Yongming
A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients
title A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients
title_full A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients
title_fullStr A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients
title_full_unstemmed A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients
title_short A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients
title_sort nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-023-00606-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hubeibei anomogrambasedonbiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectionofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivepatients
AT zhanghuili anomogrambasedonbiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectionofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivepatients
AT zhangyueyue anomogrambasedonbiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectionofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivepatients
AT jinyongming anomogrambasedonbiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectionofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivepatients
AT hubeibei nomogrambasedonbiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectionofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivepatients
AT zhanghuili nomogrambasedonbiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectionofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivepatients
AT zhangyueyue nomogrambasedonbiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectionofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivepatients
AT jinyongming nomogrambasedonbiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectionofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinbiopsynaivepatients