Cargando…

Factor structure of the Social Phobia Scale (SPS) and the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) in a clinical sample recruited from the community

BACKGROUND: The Social Phobia Scale (SPS) and the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) are widely used self-report questionnaires to assess symptoms of social anxiety. While SPS measures social performance anxiety, SIAS measures social interaction anxiety. They are mostly reported simultaneously,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Šipka, Dajana, Brodbeck, Jeannette, Schulz, Ava, Stolz, Timo, Berger, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05142-8
_version_ 1785101338702512128
author Šipka, Dajana
Brodbeck, Jeannette
Schulz, Ava
Stolz, Timo
Berger, Thomas
author_facet Šipka, Dajana
Brodbeck, Jeannette
Schulz, Ava
Stolz, Timo
Berger, Thomas
author_sort Šipka, Dajana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Social Phobia Scale (SPS) and the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) are widely used self-report questionnaires to assess symptoms of social anxiety. While SPS measures social performance anxiety, SIAS measures social interaction anxiety. They are mostly reported simultaneously, but there have not been consistent results of the joint factor structure and therefore no consistent recommendations on how to use and evaluate the questionnaires. This study aimed (1) to evaluate the underlying joint factor structure of the SPS and SIAS and (2) to test whether SPS and SIAS are reliable scales to assess two different aspects of social anxiety. METHODS: The one-factor, two-factor, and bifactor models were tested in a clinical sample recruited from the community and diagnosed with a social anxiety disorder. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted, bifactor-specific indices were calculated, and the content of the less fitting items was examined. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analyses showed that the best-fitting model was the bifactor model with a reduced set of items. The bifactor-specific indices showed that the factor structure cannot be considered unidimensional and that SPS and SIAS are reliable subscales. A closer examination of the less fitting item content and implications for future studies are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, SPS and SIAS can be reported together as an overall score of social anxiety and are separately reliable measures to assess different aspects of social anxiety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This is a secondary analysis of data from two trials registered under ISRCTN75894275 and ISRCTN10627379. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-023-05142-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10478387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104783872023-09-06 Factor structure of the Social Phobia Scale (SPS) and the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) in a clinical sample recruited from the community Šipka, Dajana Brodbeck, Jeannette Schulz, Ava Stolz, Timo Berger, Thomas BMC Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: The Social Phobia Scale (SPS) and the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) are widely used self-report questionnaires to assess symptoms of social anxiety. While SPS measures social performance anxiety, SIAS measures social interaction anxiety. They are mostly reported simultaneously, but there have not been consistent results of the joint factor structure and therefore no consistent recommendations on how to use and evaluate the questionnaires. This study aimed (1) to evaluate the underlying joint factor structure of the SPS and SIAS and (2) to test whether SPS and SIAS are reliable scales to assess two different aspects of social anxiety. METHODS: The one-factor, two-factor, and bifactor models were tested in a clinical sample recruited from the community and diagnosed with a social anxiety disorder. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted, bifactor-specific indices were calculated, and the content of the less fitting items was examined. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analyses showed that the best-fitting model was the bifactor model with a reduced set of items. The bifactor-specific indices showed that the factor structure cannot be considered unidimensional and that SPS and SIAS are reliable subscales. A closer examination of the less fitting item content and implications for future studies are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, SPS and SIAS can be reported together as an overall score of social anxiety and are separately reliable measures to assess different aspects of social anxiety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This is a secondary analysis of data from two trials registered under ISRCTN75894275 and ISRCTN10627379. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-023-05142-8. BioMed Central 2023-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10478387/ /pubmed/37667274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05142-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Šipka, Dajana
Brodbeck, Jeannette
Schulz, Ava
Stolz, Timo
Berger, Thomas
Factor structure of the Social Phobia Scale (SPS) and the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) in a clinical sample recruited from the community
title Factor structure of the Social Phobia Scale (SPS) and the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) in a clinical sample recruited from the community
title_full Factor structure of the Social Phobia Scale (SPS) and the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) in a clinical sample recruited from the community
title_fullStr Factor structure of the Social Phobia Scale (SPS) and the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) in a clinical sample recruited from the community
title_full_unstemmed Factor structure of the Social Phobia Scale (SPS) and the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) in a clinical sample recruited from the community
title_short Factor structure of the Social Phobia Scale (SPS) and the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) in a clinical sample recruited from the community
title_sort factor structure of the social phobia scale (sps) and the social interaction anxiety scale (sias) in a clinical sample recruited from the community
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05142-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sipkadajana factorstructureofthesocialphobiascalespsandthesocialinteractionanxietyscalesiasinaclinicalsamplerecruitedfromthecommunity
AT brodbeckjeannette factorstructureofthesocialphobiascalespsandthesocialinteractionanxietyscalesiasinaclinicalsamplerecruitedfromthecommunity
AT schulzava factorstructureofthesocialphobiascalespsandthesocialinteractionanxietyscalesiasinaclinicalsamplerecruitedfromthecommunity
AT stolztimo factorstructureofthesocialphobiascalespsandthesocialinteractionanxietyscalesiasinaclinicalsamplerecruitedfromthecommunity
AT bergerthomas factorstructureofthesocialphobiascalespsandthesocialinteractionanxietyscalesiasinaclinicalsamplerecruitedfromthecommunity