Cargando…

Double posteromedial portals versus single posteromedial portal for arthroscopic management of popliteal cysts

BACKGROUND: As a common disease in orthopedic clinics, popliteal cysts often coexist with intra-articular lesions. Compared with traditional open surgery, arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cysts is less traumatic, and intra-articular lesions can be treated. The ‘one-way valve’ mechanism of the pop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Rui, Zhu, Zheyue, Liu, Dan, Wang, Kunzheng, Yang, Pei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04132-6
_version_ 1785101341984555008
author Ma, Rui
Zhu, Zheyue
Liu, Dan
Wang, Kunzheng
Yang, Pei
author_facet Ma, Rui
Zhu, Zheyue
Liu, Dan
Wang, Kunzheng
Yang, Pei
author_sort Ma, Rui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As a common disease in orthopedic clinics, popliteal cysts often coexist with intra-articular lesions. Compared with traditional open surgery, arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cysts is less traumatic, and intra-articular lesions can be treated. The ‘one-way valve’ mechanism of the popliteal cyst can be removed by expanding the communication between the articular cavity and the cyst to avoid cyst recurrence. In terms of arthroscopic techniques, the comparison of clinical effects between the double posteromedial portal (DPP) and single posteromedial portal (SPP) has rarely been studied. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical effects of DPP and SPP. METHODS: A total of 46 consecutive patients with symptomatic popliteal cysts who underwent arthroscopic treatment were included in this study and followed for approximately 1 year. All patients were divided into two groups according to the arthroscopic portals (DPP group and SPP group). The cyst size, Lysholm score and Rauschening–Lindgren (R–L) grade were evaluated before the operation for all patients, and the intra-articular lesions, operative time and complications were recorded after operation. At the last follow-up, the Lysholm score and R–L grade were recorded, and magnetic resonance imaging was used to evaluate the outcome of the cyst. The clinical data of the two groups was statistically compared and analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in preoperative cyst size, Lysholm score or R–L grade between the two groups (P > 0.05). The operation time of the DPP group (67.52 ± 18.23 min) was longer than that of the SPP group (55.95 ± 16.40 min) (P = 0.030), but the recurrence rate of cysts in the DPP group (0%) was obviously lower than that in the SPP group (19.0%) (P = 0.046). There were no significant differences in the Lysholm score, R–L grade or complication rate between the two groups at the last follow-up (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cysts using double posteromedial portals was a safe and effective surgical method. Trial registration: ChiCTR, ChiCTR2200060115. Registered 19 May 2022, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=133199
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10478402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104784022023-09-06 Double posteromedial portals versus single posteromedial portal for arthroscopic management of popliteal cysts Ma, Rui Zhu, Zheyue Liu, Dan Wang, Kunzheng Yang, Pei J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: As a common disease in orthopedic clinics, popliteal cysts often coexist with intra-articular lesions. Compared with traditional open surgery, arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cysts is less traumatic, and intra-articular lesions can be treated. The ‘one-way valve’ mechanism of the popliteal cyst can be removed by expanding the communication between the articular cavity and the cyst to avoid cyst recurrence. In terms of arthroscopic techniques, the comparison of clinical effects between the double posteromedial portal (DPP) and single posteromedial portal (SPP) has rarely been studied. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical effects of DPP and SPP. METHODS: A total of 46 consecutive patients with symptomatic popliteal cysts who underwent arthroscopic treatment were included in this study and followed for approximately 1 year. All patients were divided into two groups according to the arthroscopic portals (DPP group and SPP group). The cyst size, Lysholm score and Rauschening–Lindgren (R–L) grade were evaluated before the operation for all patients, and the intra-articular lesions, operative time and complications were recorded after operation. At the last follow-up, the Lysholm score and R–L grade were recorded, and magnetic resonance imaging was used to evaluate the outcome of the cyst. The clinical data of the two groups was statistically compared and analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in preoperative cyst size, Lysholm score or R–L grade between the two groups (P > 0.05). The operation time of the DPP group (67.52 ± 18.23 min) was longer than that of the SPP group (55.95 ± 16.40 min) (P = 0.030), but the recurrence rate of cysts in the DPP group (0%) was obviously lower than that in the SPP group (19.0%) (P = 0.046). There were no significant differences in the Lysholm score, R–L grade or complication rate between the two groups at the last follow-up (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cysts using double posteromedial portals was a safe and effective surgical method. Trial registration: ChiCTR, ChiCTR2200060115. Registered 19 May 2022, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=133199 BioMed Central 2023-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10478402/ /pubmed/37667310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04132-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ma, Rui
Zhu, Zheyue
Liu, Dan
Wang, Kunzheng
Yang, Pei
Double posteromedial portals versus single posteromedial portal for arthroscopic management of popliteal cysts
title Double posteromedial portals versus single posteromedial portal for arthroscopic management of popliteal cysts
title_full Double posteromedial portals versus single posteromedial portal for arthroscopic management of popliteal cysts
title_fullStr Double posteromedial portals versus single posteromedial portal for arthroscopic management of popliteal cysts
title_full_unstemmed Double posteromedial portals versus single posteromedial portal for arthroscopic management of popliteal cysts
title_short Double posteromedial portals versus single posteromedial portal for arthroscopic management of popliteal cysts
title_sort double posteromedial portals versus single posteromedial portal for arthroscopic management of popliteal cysts
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04132-6
work_keys_str_mv AT marui doubleposteromedialportalsversussingleposteromedialportalforarthroscopicmanagementofpoplitealcysts
AT zhuzheyue doubleposteromedialportalsversussingleposteromedialportalforarthroscopicmanagementofpoplitealcysts
AT liudan doubleposteromedialportalsversussingleposteromedialportalforarthroscopicmanagementofpoplitealcysts
AT wangkunzheng doubleposteromedialportalsversussingleposteromedialportalforarthroscopicmanagementofpoplitealcysts
AT yangpei doubleposteromedialportalsversussingleposteromedialportalforarthroscopicmanagementofpoplitealcysts