Cargando…

Hand hygiene and biomedical waste management among medical students: a quasi-experimental study evaluating two training methods

BACKGROUND: Several studies revealed that medical students have low performance levels of hand hygiene (HH) and biomedical waste management (BMWM). However, there have been limited interventions directed at young students targeting HH and BMWM enhancement. Given these data, we aimed at assessing HH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mlouki, Imen, Ayed, Souha Ben, Chebbi, Faouzia, Rezg, Nejla, Khouildi, Aida, Sassi, Amel Haj, El Mhamdi, Sana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04617-2
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Several studies revealed that medical students have low performance levels of hand hygiene (HH) and biomedical waste management (BMWM). However, there have been limited interventions directed at young students targeting HH and BMWM enhancement. Given these data, we aimed at assessing HH and BMWM among medical students after two training methods. METHODS: We performed a quasi-experimental study from September 2021 to May 2022, which included fifth-year medical students enrolled in the faculty of Medicine of Monastir (Tunisia). We relied on a conventional training based on presentations and simulations guided by the teacher and a student-centred training method based on courses and simulated exercises prepared by students. We used the WHO HH Knowledge Questionnaire and the “BMWM audit” validated by The Nosocomial Infection Control Committee in France. RESULTS: A total of 203 medical students were included (105 in the control group and 98 in the experimental group) with a mean age of 23 ± 0.7 years. Regarding HH, we found a statistically significant increase in post-test scores for both training methods. A higher post-test mean score was noted for student-centred method (14.1 ± 1.9 vs. 13.9 ± 2.3). The overall improvement in good HH knowledge rates was greater after student-centred method compared to conventional training (40.5% vs. 25%). Concerning infectious waste, mean scores were higher after student-centred learning in all hazardous waste management steps (25 ± 3.3 vs. 23.6 ± 5.5). RESULTS: Coupling student-centred teaching and continuous supervision could improve HH and BMWM knowledge and practices among medical students.