Cargando…

Sex differences in muscle protein expression and DNA methylation in response to exercise training

BACKGROUND: Exercise training elicits changes in muscle physiology, epigenomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, with males and females exhibiting differing physiological responses to exercise training. However, the molecular mechanisms contributing to the differing adaptations between the sexes ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Landen, Shanie, Jacques, Macsue, Hiam, Danielle, Alvarez-Romero, Javier, Schittenhelm, Ralf B., Shah, Anup D., Huang, Cheng, Steele, Joel R., Harvey, Nicholas R., Haupt, Larisa M., Griffiths, Lyn R., Ashton, Kevin J., Lamon, Séverine, Voisin, Sarah, Eynon, Nir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37670389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-023-00539-2
_version_ 1785101349638111232
author Landen, Shanie
Jacques, Macsue
Hiam, Danielle
Alvarez-Romero, Javier
Schittenhelm, Ralf B.
Shah, Anup D.
Huang, Cheng
Steele, Joel R.
Harvey, Nicholas R.
Haupt, Larisa M.
Griffiths, Lyn R.
Ashton, Kevin J.
Lamon, Séverine
Voisin, Sarah
Eynon, Nir
author_facet Landen, Shanie
Jacques, Macsue
Hiam, Danielle
Alvarez-Romero, Javier
Schittenhelm, Ralf B.
Shah, Anup D.
Huang, Cheng
Steele, Joel R.
Harvey, Nicholas R.
Haupt, Larisa M.
Griffiths, Lyn R.
Ashton, Kevin J.
Lamon, Séverine
Voisin, Sarah
Eynon, Nir
author_sort Landen, Shanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Exercise training elicits changes in muscle physiology, epigenomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, with males and females exhibiting differing physiological responses to exercise training. However, the molecular mechanisms contributing to the differing adaptations between the sexes are poorly understood. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis for sex differences in skeletal muscle DNA methylation following an endurance training intervention (Gene SMART cohort and E-MTAB-11282 cohort). We investigated for sex differences in the skeletal muscle proteome following an endurance training intervention (Gene SMART cohort). Lastly, we investigated whether the methylome and proteome are associated with baseline cardiorespiratory fitness (maximal oxygen consumption; VO(2)max) in a sex-specific manner. RESULTS: Here, we investigated for the first time, DNA methylome and proteome sex differences in response to exercise training in human skeletal muscle (n = 78; 50 males, 28 females). We identified 92 DNA methylation sites (CpGs) associated with exercise training; however, no CpGs changed in a sex-dependent manner. In contrast, we identified 189 proteins that are differentially expressed between the sexes following training, with 82 proteins differentially expressed between the sexes at baseline. Proteins showing the most robust sex-specific response to exercise include SIRT3, MRPL41, and MBP. Irrespective of sex, cardiorespiratory fitness was associated with robust methylome changes (19,257 CpGs) and no proteomic changes. We did not observe sex differences in the association between cardiorespiratory fitness and the DNA methylome. Integrative multi-omic analysis identified sex-specific mitochondrial metabolism pathways associated with exercise responses. Lastly, exercise training and cardiorespiratory fitness shifted the DNA methylomes to be more similar between the sexes. CONCLUSIONS: We identified sex differences in protein expression changes, but not DNA methylation changes, following an endurance exercise training intervention; whereas we identified no sex differences in the DNA methylome or proteome response to lifelong training. Given the delicate interaction between sex and training as well as the limitations of the current study, more studies are required to elucidate whether there is a sex-specific training effect on the DNA methylome. We found that genes involved in mitochondrial metabolism pathways are differentially modulated between the sexes following endurance exercise training. These results shed light on sex differences in molecular adaptations to exercise training in skeletal muscle. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13293-023-00539-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10478435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104784352023-09-06 Sex differences in muscle protein expression and DNA methylation in response to exercise training Landen, Shanie Jacques, Macsue Hiam, Danielle Alvarez-Romero, Javier Schittenhelm, Ralf B. Shah, Anup D. Huang, Cheng Steele, Joel R. Harvey, Nicholas R. Haupt, Larisa M. Griffiths, Lyn R. Ashton, Kevin J. Lamon, Séverine Voisin, Sarah Eynon, Nir Biol Sex Differ Research BACKGROUND: Exercise training elicits changes in muscle physiology, epigenomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, with males and females exhibiting differing physiological responses to exercise training. However, the molecular mechanisms contributing to the differing adaptations between the sexes are poorly understood. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis for sex differences in skeletal muscle DNA methylation following an endurance training intervention (Gene SMART cohort and E-MTAB-11282 cohort). We investigated for sex differences in the skeletal muscle proteome following an endurance training intervention (Gene SMART cohort). Lastly, we investigated whether the methylome and proteome are associated with baseline cardiorespiratory fitness (maximal oxygen consumption; VO(2)max) in a sex-specific manner. RESULTS: Here, we investigated for the first time, DNA methylome and proteome sex differences in response to exercise training in human skeletal muscle (n = 78; 50 males, 28 females). We identified 92 DNA methylation sites (CpGs) associated with exercise training; however, no CpGs changed in a sex-dependent manner. In contrast, we identified 189 proteins that are differentially expressed between the sexes following training, with 82 proteins differentially expressed between the sexes at baseline. Proteins showing the most robust sex-specific response to exercise include SIRT3, MRPL41, and MBP. Irrespective of sex, cardiorespiratory fitness was associated with robust methylome changes (19,257 CpGs) and no proteomic changes. We did not observe sex differences in the association between cardiorespiratory fitness and the DNA methylome. Integrative multi-omic analysis identified sex-specific mitochondrial metabolism pathways associated with exercise responses. Lastly, exercise training and cardiorespiratory fitness shifted the DNA methylomes to be more similar between the sexes. CONCLUSIONS: We identified sex differences in protein expression changes, but not DNA methylation changes, following an endurance exercise training intervention; whereas we identified no sex differences in the DNA methylome or proteome response to lifelong training. Given the delicate interaction between sex and training as well as the limitations of the current study, more studies are required to elucidate whether there is a sex-specific training effect on the DNA methylome. We found that genes involved in mitochondrial metabolism pathways are differentially modulated between the sexes following endurance exercise training. These results shed light on sex differences in molecular adaptations to exercise training in skeletal muscle. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13293-023-00539-2. BioMed Central 2023-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10478435/ /pubmed/37670389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-023-00539-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Landen, Shanie
Jacques, Macsue
Hiam, Danielle
Alvarez-Romero, Javier
Schittenhelm, Ralf B.
Shah, Anup D.
Huang, Cheng
Steele, Joel R.
Harvey, Nicholas R.
Haupt, Larisa M.
Griffiths, Lyn R.
Ashton, Kevin J.
Lamon, Séverine
Voisin, Sarah
Eynon, Nir
Sex differences in muscle protein expression and DNA methylation in response to exercise training
title Sex differences in muscle protein expression and DNA methylation in response to exercise training
title_full Sex differences in muscle protein expression and DNA methylation in response to exercise training
title_fullStr Sex differences in muscle protein expression and DNA methylation in response to exercise training
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in muscle protein expression and DNA methylation in response to exercise training
title_short Sex differences in muscle protein expression and DNA methylation in response to exercise training
title_sort sex differences in muscle protein expression and dna methylation in response to exercise training
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37670389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-023-00539-2
work_keys_str_mv AT landenshanie sexdifferencesinmuscleproteinexpressionanddnamethylationinresponsetoexercisetraining
AT jacquesmacsue sexdifferencesinmuscleproteinexpressionanddnamethylationinresponsetoexercisetraining
AT hiamdanielle sexdifferencesinmuscleproteinexpressionanddnamethylationinresponsetoexercisetraining
AT alvarezromerojavier sexdifferencesinmuscleproteinexpressionanddnamethylationinresponsetoexercisetraining
AT schittenhelmralfb sexdifferencesinmuscleproteinexpressionanddnamethylationinresponsetoexercisetraining
AT shahanupd sexdifferencesinmuscleproteinexpressionanddnamethylationinresponsetoexercisetraining
AT huangcheng sexdifferencesinmuscleproteinexpressionanddnamethylationinresponsetoexercisetraining
AT steelejoelr sexdifferencesinmuscleproteinexpressionanddnamethylationinresponsetoexercisetraining
AT harveynicholasr sexdifferencesinmuscleproteinexpressionanddnamethylationinresponsetoexercisetraining
AT hauptlarisam sexdifferencesinmuscleproteinexpressionanddnamethylationinresponsetoexercisetraining
AT griffithslynr sexdifferencesinmuscleproteinexpressionanddnamethylationinresponsetoexercisetraining
AT ashtonkevinj sexdifferencesinmuscleproteinexpressionanddnamethylationinresponsetoexercisetraining
AT lamonseverine sexdifferencesinmuscleproteinexpressionanddnamethylationinresponsetoexercisetraining
AT voisinsarah sexdifferencesinmuscleproteinexpressionanddnamethylationinresponsetoexercisetraining
AT eynonnir sexdifferencesinmuscleproteinexpressionanddnamethylationinresponsetoexercisetraining