Cargando…

Guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity? a comparative study of murderers referred for psychiatric examination by court order

BACKGROUND: Some murders are committed under the influence of a psychotic state resulting from a mental disorder, mainly schizophrenia. According to the law in many countries, people with mental disorders do not have criminal responsibility. They are defined as not guilty due to insanity (insanity d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Antar, Anat Yaron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37668924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40352-023-00230-z
_version_ 1785101365807153152
author Antar, Anat Yaron
author_facet Antar, Anat Yaron
author_sort Antar, Anat Yaron
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Some murders are committed under the influence of a psychotic state resulting from a mental disorder, mainly schizophrenia. According to the law in many countries, people with mental disorders do not have criminal responsibility. They are defined as not guilty due to insanity (insanity defense) and therefore cannot be punished. In Israel, in recent years, more lawyers are requesting psychiatric opinions for the murder defendants they represent. This study aims to explore the differences between two groups of murderers: individuals who committed murder and were found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) and individuals who committed murder and were found responsible and guilty. The comparison is made from a broad perspective by examining sociodemographic factors and psychiatric factors as well as criminological and forensic factors. METHODS: This study, conducted in Israel, analyzes the sociodemographic and forensic differences between 72 individuals who committed murder and were found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) and 56 individuals who committed murder and were found responsible for their actions and fit to stand trial (guilty). RESULTS: The findings show that NGRI participants were more likely to be from central areas, to be Jewish (rather than Arab), to be diagnosed with schizophrenia and have a background of hospitalizations before committing the murder, to have remained at the murder scene and/or called for help, and to be less likely to have committed the murder with a partner. CONCLUSIONS: The study’s findings are explained and the limitations discussed. The findings add to the existing knowledge base about murder by reason of insanity and the differences between NGRI and criminal murderers. The characteristics of the NGRI group found here can help to identify risk groups and to develop and implement prevention programs for people with mental disorders who are at risk of violent behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10478500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104785002023-09-06 Guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity? a comparative study of murderers referred for psychiatric examination by court order Antar, Anat Yaron Health Justice Research Article BACKGROUND: Some murders are committed under the influence of a psychotic state resulting from a mental disorder, mainly schizophrenia. According to the law in many countries, people with mental disorders do not have criminal responsibility. They are defined as not guilty due to insanity (insanity defense) and therefore cannot be punished. In Israel, in recent years, more lawyers are requesting psychiatric opinions for the murder defendants they represent. This study aims to explore the differences between two groups of murderers: individuals who committed murder and were found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) and individuals who committed murder and were found responsible and guilty. The comparison is made from a broad perspective by examining sociodemographic factors and psychiatric factors as well as criminological and forensic factors. METHODS: This study, conducted in Israel, analyzes the sociodemographic and forensic differences between 72 individuals who committed murder and were found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) and 56 individuals who committed murder and were found responsible for their actions and fit to stand trial (guilty). RESULTS: The findings show that NGRI participants were more likely to be from central areas, to be Jewish (rather than Arab), to be diagnosed with schizophrenia and have a background of hospitalizations before committing the murder, to have remained at the murder scene and/or called for help, and to be less likely to have committed the murder with a partner. CONCLUSIONS: The study’s findings are explained and the limitations discussed. The findings add to the existing knowledge base about murder by reason of insanity and the differences between NGRI and criminal murderers. The characteristics of the NGRI group found here can help to identify risk groups and to develop and implement prevention programs for people with mental disorders who are at risk of violent behavior. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10478500/ /pubmed/37668924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40352-023-00230-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Antar, Anat Yaron
Guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity? a comparative study of murderers referred for psychiatric examination by court order
title Guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity? a comparative study of murderers referred for psychiatric examination by court order
title_full Guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity? a comparative study of murderers referred for psychiatric examination by court order
title_fullStr Guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity? a comparative study of murderers referred for psychiatric examination by court order
title_full_unstemmed Guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity? a comparative study of murderers referred for psychiatric examination by court order
title_short Guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity? a comparative study of murderers referred for psychiatric examination by court order
title_sort guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity? a comparative study of murderers referred for psychiatric examination by court order
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37668924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40352-023-00230-z
work_keys_str_mv AT antaranatyaron guiltyornotguiltybyreasonofinsanityacomparativestudyofmurderersreferredforpsychiatricexaminationbycourtorder