Cargando…

Deciphering the driving forces in crystal packing by analysis of electrostatic energies and contact enrichment ratios

Hirshfeld surface analysis is a widely used tool for identifying the types of intermolecular contacts that contribute most significantly to crystal packing stabilization. One useful metric for analyzing these contacts is the contact enrichment descriptor, which indicates the types of contacts that a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jelsch, Christian, Bibila Mayaya Bisseyou, Yvon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Union of Crystallography 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37449972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252523005675
_version_ 1785101368257675264
author Jelsch, Christian
Bibila Mayaya Bisseyou, Yvon
author_facet Jelsch, Christian
Bibila Mayaya Bisseyou, Yvon
author_sort Jelsch, Christian
collection PubMed
description Hirshfeld surface analysis is a widely used tool for identifying the types of intermolecular contacts that contribute most significantly to crystal packing stabilization. One useful metric for analyzing these contacts is the contact enrichment descriptor, which indicates the types of contacts that are over- or under-represented. In this statistical study, enrichment ratios were combined with electrostatic energy (E (elec)) data for a variety of compound families. To compute the electrostatic interaction energy between atoms, charge density models from the ELMAM2 database of multipolar atoms were used. As expected, strong hydrogen bonds such as O/N—H⋯N and O/N—H⋯O typically display large enrichment values and have the most negative (i.e. favorable) electrostatic energies. Conversely, contacts that are repulsive from an electrostatic perspective are usually the most under-represented. Analyzing the enrichment ratio and electrostatic energy indicators was shown to help identify which favorable contacts are the most competitive with each other. For weaker interactions, such as hydro­phobic contacts, the behavior is less clear cut and can depend on other factors such as the chemical content of the molecule. The anticorrelation between contact enrichment and E (elec) is generally lost for weaker contacts. However, we observed that C⋯C contacts are often enriched in crystal structures containing heterocycles, despite the low electrostatic attraction. For molecules with only weak hydrogen bond donors/acceptors and hydro­phobic groups, the correlation between contact enrichment and E (elec) is still evident for the strongest of these interactions. However, there are some exceptions where the most favorable contacts from an electrostatic perspective are not the most over-represented. This can occur in cases where the shape of the molecule is complex or elongated, favoring dispersion forces and shape complementarity in the packing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10478513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher International Union of Crystallography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104785132023-09-06 Deciphering the driving forces in crystal packing by analysis of electrostatic energies and contact enrichment ratios Jelsch, Christian Bibila Mayaya Bisseyou, Yvon IUCrJ Research Papers Hirshfeld surface analysis is a widely used tool for identifying the types of intermolecular contacts that contribute most significantly to crystal packing stabilization. One useful metric for analyzing these contacts is the contact enrichment descriptor, which indicates the types of contacts that are over- or under-represented. In this statistical study, enrichment ratios were combined with electrostatic energy (E (elec)) data for a variety of compound families. To compute the electrostatic interaction energy between atoms, charge density models from the ELMAM2 database of multipolar atoms were used. As expected, strong hydrogen bonds such as O/N—H⋯N and O/N—H⋯O typically display large enrichment values and have the most negative (i.e. favorable) electrostatic energies. Conversely, contacts that are repulsive from an electrostatic perspective are usually the most under-represented. Analyzing the enrichment ratio and electrostatic energy indicators was shown to help identify which favorable contacts are the most competitive with each other. For weaker interactions, such as hydro­phobic contacts, the behavior is less clear cut and can depend on other factors such as the chemical content of the molecule. The anticorrelation between contact enrichment and E (elec) is generally lost for weaker contacts. However, we observed that C⋯C contacts are often enriched in crystal structures containing heterocycles, despite the low electrostatic attraction. For molecules with only weak hydrogen bond donors/acceptors and hydro­phobic groups, the correlation between contact enrichment and E (elec) is still evident for the strongest of these interactions. However, there are some exceptions where the most favorable contacts from an electrostatic perspective are not the most over-represented. This can occur in cases where the shape of the molecule is complex or elongated, favoring dispersion forces and shape complementarity in the packing. International Union of Crystallography 2023-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10478513/ /pubmed/37449972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252523005675 Text en © Christian Jelsch et al. 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Jelsch, Christian
Bibila Mayaya Bisseyou, Yvon
Deciphering the driving forces in crystal packing by analysis of electrostatic energies and contact enrichment ratios
title Deciphering the driving forces in crystal packing by analysis of electrostatic energies and contact enrichment ratios
title_full Deciphering the driving forces in crystal packing by analysis of electrostatic energies and contact enrichment ratios
title_fullStr Deciphering the driving forces in crystal packing by analysis of electrostatic energies and contact enrichment ratios
title_full_unstemmed Deciphering the driving forces in crystal packing by analysis of electrostatic energies and contact enrichment ratios
title_short Deciphering the driving forces in crystal packing by analysis of electrostatic energies and contact enrichment ratios
title_sort deciphering the driving forces in crystal packing by analysis of electrostatic energies and contact enrichment ratios
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37449972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252523005675
work_keys_str_mv AT jelschchristian decipheringthedrivingforcesincrystalpackingbyanalysisofelectrostaticenergiesandcontactenrichmentratios
AT bibilamayayabisseyouyvon decipheringthedrivingforcesincrystalpackingbyanalysisofelectrostaticenergiesandcontactenrichmentratios