Cargando…
Safety considerations for assessing the quality of apps used during pregnancy: A scoping review
OBJECTIVE: Pregnant women are increasingly turning to apps targeting knowledge and behaviour change for supporting healthy lifestyles and managing medical conditions. Yet, there is growing concern over the credibility and safety of content within mobile health (mHealth) apps. This scoping review aim...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37675058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231198683 |
_version_ | 1785101379418718208 |
---|---|
author | Carrandi, Alayna Hayman, Melanie Harrison, Cheryce L |
author_facet | Carrandi, Alayna Hayman, Melanie Harrison, Cheryce L |
author_sort | Carrandi, Alayna |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Pregnant women are increasingly turning to apps targeting knowledge and behaviour change for supporting healthy lifestyles and managing medical conditions. Yet, there is growing concern over the credibility and safety of content within mobile health (mHealth) apps. This scoping review aimed to systematically and thematically consolidate safety considerations described in reviews evaluating pregnancy-specific apps. METHODS: PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE® and EPub, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Libraries, and SCOPUS were systematically searched to identify reviews that assessed apps targeting pregnant women. Data related to safety were extracted and thematically analysed to establish a set of relevant safety considerations. RESULTS: Sixteen reviews met the inclusion criteria. The included reviews assessed an average of 27 apps each and targeted pregnancy topics, such as nutrition and physical activity. Five major and 20 minor themes were identified, including information, transparency, credibility, privacy and security, and app tailoring. Information, transparency, and credibility relate to the evidence base of information within the app, privacy and security of apps relate to the protection of personal information and data, and app tailoring relates to the consideration of contextual factors, such as local guidelines and digital health literacy. CONCLUSIONS: Results present possible safety considerations when evaluating pregnancy-specific apps and emphasise a clear need for consumer guidance on how to make informed decisions around engagement and use of mHealth apps during pregnancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10478559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104785592023-09-06 Safety considerations for assessing the quality of apps used during pregnancy: A scoping review Carrandi, Alayna Hayman, Melanie Harrison, Cheryce L Digit Health Review Article OBJECTIVE: Pregnant women are increasingly turning to apps targeting knowledge and behaviour change for supporting healthy lifestyles and managing medical conditions. Yet, there is growing concern over the credibility and safety of content within mobile health (mHealth) apps. This scoping review aimed to systematically and thematically consolidate safety considerations described in reviews evaluating pregnancy-specific apps. METHODS: PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE® and EPub, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Libraries, and SCOPUS were systematically searched to identify reviews that assessed apps targeting pregnant women. Data related to safety were extracted and thematically analysed to establish a set of relevant safety considerations. RESULTS: Sixteen reviews met the inclusion criteria. The included reviews assessed an average of 27 apps each and targeted pregnancy topics, such as nutrition and physical activity. Five major and 20 minor themes were identified, including information, transparency, credibility, privacy and security, and app tailoring. Information, transparency, and credibility relate to the evidence base of information within the app, privacy and security of apps relate to the protection of personal information and data, and app tailoring relates to the consideration of contextual factors, such as local guidelines and digital health literacy. CONCLUSIONS: Results present possible safety considerations when evaluating pregnancy-specific apps and emphasise a clear need for consumer guidance on how to make informed decisions around engagement and use of mHealth apps during pregnancy. SAGE Publications 2023-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10478559/ /pubmed/37675058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231198683 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Carrandi, Alayna Hayman, Melanie Harrison, Cheryce L Safety considerations for assessing the quality of apps used during pregnancy: A scoping review |
title | Safety considerations for assessing the quality of apps used during pregnancy: A scoping review |
title_full | Safety considerations for assessing the quality of apps used during pregnancy: A scoping review |
title_fullStr | Safety considerations for assessing the quality of apps used during pregnancy: A scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety considerations for assessing the quality of apps used during pregnancy: A scoping review |
title_short | Safety considerations for assessing the quality of apps used during pregnancy: A scoping review |
title_sort | safety considerations for assessing the quality of apps used during pregnancy: a scoping review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37675058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231198683 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carrandialayna safetyconsiderationsforassessingthequalityofappsusedduringpregnancyascopingreview AT haymanmelanie safetyconsiderationsforassessingthequalityofappsusedduringpregnancyascopingreview AT harrisoncherycel safetyconsiderationsforassessingthequalityofappsusedduringpregnancyascopingreview |