Cargando…

A Cost Analysis of Rethink the Strip: De-implementing a Low-value Practice in Primary Care

BACKGROUND: Routine self-monitoring of blood glucose is a low-value practice that provides limited benefit for patients with non–insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVES: We estimated the costs of Rethink the Strip (RTS), a multistrategy approach to the de-implementation of self-monitori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spees, Lisa P., Young, Laura A., Rees, Jennifer, Mottus, Kathleen, Leeman, Jennifer, Boynton, Marcella H., Richman, Erica, Vu, Maihan B., Donahue, Katrina E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37943526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001899
_version_ 1785101406239195136
author Spees, Lisa P.
Young, Laura A.
Rees, Jennifer
Mottus, Kathleen
Leeman, Jennifer
Boynton, Marcella H.
Richman, Erica
Vu, Maihan B.
Donahue, Katrina E.
author_facet Spees, Lisa P.
Young, Laura A.
Rees, Jennifer
Mottus, Kathleen
Leeman, Jennifer
Boynton, Marcella H.
Richman, Erica
Vu, Maihan B.
Donahue, Katrina E.
author_sort Spees, Lisa P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Routine self-monitoring of blood glucose is a low-value practice that provides limited benefit for patients with non–insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVES: We estimated the costs of Rethink the Strip (RTS), a multistrategy approach to the de-implementation of self-monitoring of blood glucose in primary care. RESEARCH DESIGN: RTS was conducted among 20 primary care clinics in North Carolina. We estimated the non–site-based and site-based costs of the 5 RTS strategies (practice facilitation, audit and feedback, provider champions, educational meetings, and educational materials) from the analytic perspective of an integrated health care system for 12 and 27-month time horizons. Material costs were tracked through project records, and personnel costs were assessed using activity-based costing. We used nationally based wage estimates. RESULTS: Total RTS costs equaled $68,941 for 12 months. Specifically, non–site-based costs comprised $16,560. Most non–site-based costs ($11,822) were from the foundational programming and coding updates to the electronic health record data to develop the audit and feedback reports. The non–site-based costs of educational meetings, practice facilitation, and educational materials were substantially lower, ranging between ~$400 and $1000. Total 12-month site-based costs equaled $2569 for a single clinic (or $52,381 for 20 clinics). Educational meetings were the most expensive strategy, averaging $1401 per clinic. The site-based costs for the 4 other implementation strategies were markedly lower, ranging between $51 for educational materials and $555 for practice facilitation per clinic. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides detailed cost information for implementation strategies used to support evidence-based programs in primary care clinics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10478673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104786732023-09-06 A Cost Analysis of Rethink the Strip: De-implementing a Low-value Practice in Primary Care Spees, Lisa P. Young, Laura A. Rees, Jennifer Mottus, Kathleen Leeman, Jennifer Boynton, Marcella H. Richman, Erica Vu, Maihan B. Donahue, Katrina E. Med Care PCORI: The Cost of Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices BACKGROUND: Routine self-monitoring of blood glucose is a low-value practice that provides limited benefit for patients with non–insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVES: We estimated the costs of Rethink the Strip (RTS), a multistrategy approach to the de-implementation of self-monitoring of blood glucose in primary care. RESEARCH DESIGN: RTS was conducted among 20 primary care clinics in North Carolina. We estimated the non–site-based and site-based costs of the 5 RTS strategies (practice facilitation, audit and feedback, provider champions, educational meetings, and educational materials) from the analytic perspective of an integrated health care system for 12 and 27-month time horizons. Material costs were tracked through project records, and personnel costs were assessed using activity-based costing. We used nationally based wage estimates. RESULTS: Total RTS costs equaled $68,941 for 12 months. Specifically, non–site-based costs comprised $16,560. Most non–site-based costs ($11,822) were from the foundational programming and coding updates to the electronic health record data to develop the audit and feedback reports. The non–site-based costs of educational meetings, practice facilitation, and educational materials were substantially lower, ranging between ~$400 and $1000. Total 12-month site-based costs equaled $2569 for a single clinic (or $52,381 for 20 clinics). Educational meetings were the most expensive strategy, averaging $1401 per clinic. The site-based costs for the 4 other implementation strategies were markedly lower, ranging between $51 for educational materials and $555 for practice facilitation per clinic. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides detailed cost information for implementation strategies used to support evidence-based programs in primary care clinics. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-10 2023-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10478673/ /pubmed/37943526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001899 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle PCORI: The Cost of Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices
Spees, Lisa P.
Young, Laura A.
Rees, Jennifer
Mottus, Kathleen
Leeman, Jennifer
Boynton, Marcella H.
Richman, Erica
Vu, Maihan B.
Donahue, Katrina E.
A Cost Analysis of Rethink the Strip: De-implementing a Low-value Practice in Primary Care
title A Cost Analysis of Rethink the Strip: De-implementing a Low-value Practice in Primary Care
title_full A Cost Analysis of Rethink the Strip: De-implementing a Low-value Practice in Primary Care
title_fullStr A Cost Analysis of Rethink the Strip: De-implementing a Low-value Practice in Primary Care
title_full_unstemmed A Cost Analysis of Rethink the Strip: De-implementing a Low-value Practice in Primary Care
title_short A Cost Analysis of Rethink the Strip: De-implementing a Low-value Practice in Primary Care
title_sort cost analysis of rethink the strip: de-implementing a low-value practice in primary care
topic PCORI: The Cost of Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37943526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001899
work_keys_str_mv AT speeslisap acostanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT younglauraa acostanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT reesjennifer acostanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT mottuskathleen acostanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT leemanjennifer acostanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT boyntonmarcellah acostanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT richmanerica acostanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT vumaihanb acostanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT donahuekatrinae acostanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT speeslisap costanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT younglauraa costanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT reesjennifer costanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT mottuskathleen costanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT leemanjennifer costanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT boyntonmarcellah costanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT richmanerica costanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT vumaihanb costanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT donahuekatrinae costanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare