Cargando…
A Cost Analysis of Rethink the Strip: De-implementing a Low-value Practice in Primary Care
BACKGROUND: Routine self-monitoring of blood glucose is a low-value practice that provides limited benefit for patients with non–insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVES: We estimated the costs of Rethink the Strip (RTS), a multistrategy approach to the de-implementation of self-monitori...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37943526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001899 |
_version_ | 1785101406239195136 |
---|---|
author | Spees, Lisa P. Young, Laura A. Rees, Jennifer Mottus, Kathleen Leeman, Jennifer Boynton, Marcella H. Richman, Erica Vu, Maihan B. Donahue, Katrina E. |
author_facet | Spees, Lisa P. Young, Laura A. Rees, Jennifer Mottus, Kathleen Leeman, Jennifer Boynton, Marcella H. Richman, Erica Vu, Maihan B. Donahue, Katrina E. |
author_sort | Spees, Lisa P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Routine self-monitoring of blood glucose is a low-value practice that provides limited benefit for patients with non–insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVES: We estimated the costs of Rethink the Strip (RTS), a multistrategy approach to the de-implementation of self-monitoring of blood glucose in primary care. RESEARCH DESIGN: RTS was conducted among 20 primary care clinics in North Carolina. We estimated the non–site-based and site-based costs of the 5 RTS strategies (practice facilitation, audit and feedback, provider champions, educational meetings, and educational materials) from the analytic perspective of an integrated health care system for 12 and 27-month time horizons. Material costs were tracked through project records, and personnel costs were assessed using activity-based costing. We used nationally based wage estimates. RESULTS: Total RTS costs equaled $68,941 for 12 months. Specifically, non–site-based costs comprised $16,560. Most non–site-based costs ($11,822) were from the foundational programming and coding updates to the electronic health record data to develop the audit and feedback reports. The non–site-based costs of educational meetings, practice facilitation, and educational materials were substantially lower, ranging between ~$400 and $1000. Total 12-month site-based costs equaled $2569 for a single clinic (or $52,381 for 20 clinics). Educational meetings were the most expensive strategy, averaging $1401 per clinic. The site-based costs for the 4 other implementation strategies were markedly lower, ranging between $51 for educational materials and $555 for practice facilitation per clinic. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides detailed cost information for implementation strategies used to support evidence-based programs in primary care clinics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10478673 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104786732023-09-06 A Cost Analysis of Rethink the Strip: De-implementing a Low-value Practice in Primary Care Spees, Lisa P. Young, Laura A. Rees, Jennifer Mottus, Kathleen Leeman, Jennifer Boynton, Marcella H. Richman, Erica Vu, Maihan B. Donahue, Katrina E. Med Care PCORI: The Cost of Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices BACKGROUND: Routine self-monitoring of blood glucose is a low-value practice that provides limited benefit for patients with non–insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVES: We estimated the costs of Rethink the Strip (RTS), a multistrategy approach to the de-implementation of self-monitoring of blood glucose in primary care. RESEARCH DESIGN: RTS was conducted among 20 primary care clinics in North Carolina. We estimated the non–site-based and site-based costs of the 5 RTS strategies (practice facilitation, audit and feedback, provider champions, educational meetings, and educational materials) from the analytic perspective of an integrated health care system for 12 and 27-month time horizons. Material costs were tracked through project records, and personnel costs were assessed using activity-based costing. We used nationally based wage estimates. RESULTS: Total RTS costs equaled $68,941 for 12 months. Specifically, non–site-based costs comprised $16,560. Most non–site-based costs ($11,822) were from the foundational programming and coding updates to the electronic health record data to develop the audit and feedback reports. The non–site-based costs of educational meetings, practice facilitation, and educational materials were substantially lower, ranging between ~$400 and $1000. Total 12-month site-based costs equaled $2569 for a single clinic (or $52,381 for 20 clinics). Educational meetings were the most expensive strategy, averaging $1401 per clinic. The site-based costs for the 4 other implementation strategies were markedly lower, ranging between $51 for educational materials and $555 for practice facilitation per clinic. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides detailed cost information for implementation strategies used to support evidence-based programs in primary care clinics. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-10 2023-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10478673/ /pubmed/37943526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001899 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | PCORI: The Cost of Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices Spees, Lisa P. Young, Laura A. Rees, Jennifer Mottus, Kathleen Leeman, Jennifer Boynton, Marcella H. Richman, Erica Vu, Maihan B. Donahue, Katrina E. A Cost Analysis of Rethink the Strip: De-implementing a Low-value Practice in Primary Care |
title | A Cost Analysis of Rethink the Strip: De-implementing a Low-value Practice in Primary Care |
title_full | A Cost Analysis of Rethink the Strip: De-implementing a Low-value Practice in Primary Care |
title_fullStr | A Cost Analysis of Rethink the Strip: De-implementing a Low-value Practice in Primary Care |
title_full_unstemmed | A Cost Analysis of Rethink the Strip: De-implementing a Low-value Practice in Primary Care |
title_short | A Cost Analysis of Rethink the Strip: De-implementing a Low-value Practice in Primary Care |
title_sort | cost analysis of rethink the strip: de-implementing a low-value practice in primary care |
topic | PCORI: The Cost of Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37943526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001899 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT speeslisap acostanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare AT younglauraa acostanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare AT reesjennifer acostanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare AT mottuskathleen acostanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare AT leemanjennifer acostanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare AT boyntonmarcellah acostanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare AT richmanerica acostanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare AT vumaihanb acostanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare AT donahuekatrinae acostanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare AT speeslisap costanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare AT younglauraa costanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare AT reesjennifer costanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare AT mottuskathleen costanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare AT leemanjennifer costanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare AT boyntonmarcellah costanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare AT richmanerica costanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare AT vumaihanb costanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare AT donahuekatrinae costanalysisofrethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare |