Cargando…

Assessment of psychosocial risks in Electricity and Gaz Company

INTRODUCTION: Risk evaluation is a global process covering different aspects of employee’s workandfamily life. Nowadays, psychosocial risks are as important as physical and chemical risks, and their identification isdeterminant in each workplace. OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to assess psychosocial ri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hrairi, A., Kammoun, N., Rmadi, N., Masmoudi, R., Jmal Hammami, K., Masmoudi, M. L., Masmoudi, J., Hajjaji, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478857/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2038
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Risk evaluation is a global process covering different aspects of employee’s workandfamily life. Nowadays, psychosocial risks are as important as physical and chemical risks, and their identification isdeterminant in each workplace. OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to assess psychosocial risks among Electricity and Gas Company’s employees and to identify factors related to these risks. METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted among male workers in a Tunisian electricity and gas Company. The KRASEK scale was used to assess psychosocial risks. The Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 23. RESULTS: Among male workers in the company, 83 employees participated in this study. The mean age of our population was 41.28 years± 12.12 years. Manuel labour was identified in 67.5% of cases. High psychological demands were reported by 63.9% of the employees. The assessment of decision latitude dimension identified low autonomy at work in 54.2% of cases. The mean social support scale was 23.73± 4.18. Job strain was identified among 32.5% of participants. Among employees in job strain, twenty-one subjects (77.8%) were affected in the technical division and 21.7% were in “iso strain”. Job strain and iso strain were associated with sedentary workers aged less than 45 years, p values were 0.006 (OR= 5.474; IC 95% [1.477-20.290]) and 0.010 (OR= 4.917; IC 95% [1.353-17.872]) respectively. However, Iso strain was negatively associated with being married (p=0.038) (0.0327 IC 95% [0.111-0.964]). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted the importance of psychosocial risks in this company. The identification of these risks in the workplace may further help preventers to recommend proper interventions to offer employees a supportive work environment and to enhance their personal and professional well-being. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: None Declared