Cargando…

Contribution of glial cells to the neuroprotective effects triggered by repetitive magnetic stimulation: a systematic review

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has been increasingly studied in different neurological diseases, and although most studies focus on its effects on neuronal cells, the contribution of non-neuronal cells to the improvement triggered by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in thes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferreira, Susana A., Pinto, Nuno, Serrenho, Inês, Pato, Maria Vaz, Baltazar, Graça
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10479834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37488852
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.374140
_version_ 1785101676811649024
author Ferreira, Susana A.
Pinto, Nuno
Serrenho, Inês
Pato, Maria Vaz
Baltazar, Graça
author_facet Ferreira, Susana A.
Pinto, Nuno
Serrenho, Inês
Pato, Maria Vaz
Baltazar, Graça
author_sort Ferreira, Susana A.
collection PubMed
description Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has been increasingly studied in different neurological diseases, and although most studies focus on its effects on neuronal cells, the contribution of non-neuronal cells to the improvement triggered by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in these diseases has been increasingly suggested. To systematically review the effects of repetitive magnetic stimulation on non-neuronal cells two online databases, Web of Science and PubMed were searched for the effects of high-frequency-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, low-frequency-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, intermittent theta-burst stimulation, continuous theta-burst stimulation, or repetitive magnetic stimulation on non-neuronal cells in models of disease and in unlesioned animals or cells. A total of 52 studies were included. The protocol more frequently used was high-frequency-repetitive magnetic stimulation, and in models of disease, most studies report that high-frequency-repetitive magnetic stimulation led to a decrease in astrocyte and microglial reactivity, a decrease in the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and an increase of oligodendrocyte proliferation. The trend towards decreased microglial and astrocyte reactivity as well as increased oligodendrocyte proliferation occurred with intermittent theta-burst stimulation and continuous theta-burst stimulation. Few papers analyzed the low-frequency-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, and the parameters evaluated were restricted to the study of astrocyte reactivity and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, reporting the absence of effects on these parameters. In what concerns the use of magnetic stimulation in unlesioned animals or cells, most articles on all four types of stimulation reported a lack of effects. It is also important to point out that the studies were developed mostly in male rodents, not evaluating possible differential effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation between sexes. This systematic review supports that through modulation of glial cells repetitive magnetic stimulation contributes to the neuroprotection or repair in various neurological disease models. However, it should be noted that there are still few articles focusing on the impact of repetitive magnetic stimulation on non-neuronal cells and most studies did not perform in-depth analyses of the effects, emphasizing the need for more studies in this field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10479834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104798342023-09-06 Contribution of glial cells to the neuroprotective effects triggered by repetitive magnetic stimulation: a systematic review Ferreira, Susana A. Pinto, Nuno Serrenho, Inês Pato, Maria Vaz Baltazar, Graça Neural Regen Res Review Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has been increasingly studied in different neurological diseases, and although most studies focus on its effects on neuronal cells, the contribution of non-neuronal cells to the improvement triggered by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in these diseases has been increasingly suggested. To systematically review the effects of repetitive magnetic stimulation on non-neuronal cells two online databases, Web of Science and PubMed were searched for the effects of high-frequency-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, low-frequency-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, intermittent theta-burst stimulation, continuous theta-burst stimulation, or repetitive magnetic stimulation on non-neuronal cells in models of disease and in unlesioned animals or cells. A total of 52 studies were included. The protocol more frequently used was high-frequency-repetitive magnetic stimulation, and in models of disease, most studies report that high-frequency-repetitive magnetic stimulation led to a decrease in astrocyte and microglial reactivity, a decrease in the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and an increase of oligodendrocyte proliferation. The trend towards decreased microglial and astrocyte reactivity as well as increased oligodendrocyte proliferation occurred with intermittent theta-burst stimulation and continuous theta-burst stimulation. Few papers analyzed the low-frequency-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, and the parameters evaluated were restricted to the study of astrocyte reactivity and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, reporting the absence of effects on these parameters. In what concerns the use of magnetic stimulation in unlesioned animals or cells, most articles on all four types of stimulation reported a lack of effects. It is also important to point out that the studies were developed mostly in male rodents, not evaluating possible differential effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation between sexes. This systematic review supports that through modulation of glial cells repetitive magnetic stimulation contributes to the neuroprotection or repair in various neurological disease models. However, it should be noted that there are still few articles focusing on the impact of repetitive magnetic stimulation on non-neuronal cells and most studies did not perform in-depth analyses of the effects, emphasizing the need for more studies in this field. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10479834/ /pubmed/37488852 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.374140 Text en Copyright: © Neural Regeneration Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review
Ferreira, Susana A.
Pinto, Nuno
Serrenho, Inês
Pato, Maria Vaz
Baltazar, Graça
Contribution of glial cells to the neuroprotective effects triggered by repetitive magnetic stimulation: a systematic review
title Contribution of glial cells to the neuroprotective effects triggered by repetitive magnetic stimulation: a systematic review
title_full Contribution of glial cells to the neuroprotective effects triggered by repetitive magnetic stimulation: a systematic review
title_fullStr Contribution of glial cells to the neuroprotective effects triggered by repetitive magnetic stimulation: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Contribution of glial cells to the neuroprotective effects triggered by repetitive magnetic stimulation: a systematic review
title_short Contribution of glial cells to the neuroprotective effects triggered by repetitive magnetic stimulation: a systematic review
title_sort contribution of glial cells to the neuroprotective effects triggered by repetitive magnetic stimulation: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10479834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37488852
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.374140
work_keys_str_mv AT ferreirasusanaa contributionofglialcellstotheneuroprotectiveeffectstriggeredbyrepetitivemagneticstimulationasystematicreview
AT pintonuno contributionofglialcellstotheneuroprotectiveeffectstriggeredbyrepetitivemagneticstimulationasystematicreview
AT serrenhoines contributionofglialcellstotheneuroprotectiveeffectstriggeredbyrepetitivemagneticstimulationasystematicreview
AT patomariavaz contributionofglialcellstotheneuroprotectiveeffectstriggeredbyrepetitivemagneticstimulationasystematicreview
AT baltazargraca contributionofglialcellstotheneuroprotectiveeffectstriggeredbyrepetitivemagneticstimulationasystematicreview