Cargando…

A structure-based gamma evaluation method for identifying clinically relevant dose differences in organs at risk

Gamma evaluation is currently the most widely used dose comparison method for patient specific quality assurance (PSQA). However, existing methods for normalising the dose difference, using either the dose at the global maximum dose point or at each local point, can respectively lead to under- and o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Liting, Baker, Anthony, Kairn, Tanya, Livingstone, Alexander, Trapp, Jamie, Crowe, Scott B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10480250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37219798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13246-023-01270-3
_version_ 1785101752647811072
author Yu, Liting
Baker, Anthony
Kairn, Tanya
Livingstone, Alexander
Trapp, Jamie
Crowe, Scott B
author_facet Yu, Liting
Baker, Anthony
Kairn, Tanya
Livingstone, Alexander
Trapp, Jamie
Crowe, Scott B
author_sort Yu, Liting
collection PubMed
description Gamma evaluation is currently the most widely used dose comparison method for patient specific quality assurance (PSQA). However, existing methods for normalising the dose difference, using either the dose at the global maximum dose point or at each local point, can respectively lead to under- and over-sensitivity to dose differences in organ-at-risk structures. This may be of concern for plan evaluation from clinical perspectives. This study has explored and proposed a new method called structural gamma, which takes structural dose tolerances into consideration while performing gamma analysis for PSQA. As a demonstration of the structural gamma method, a total of 78 retrospective plans on four treatment sites were re-calculated on an in-house Monte Carlo system and compared with doses calculated from the treatment planning system. Structural gamma evaluations were performed using both QUANTEC dose tolerances and radiation oncologist specified dose tolerances, then compared with conventional global and local gamma evaluations. Results demonstrated that structural gamma evaluation is especially sensitive to errors in structures with restrictive dose constraints. The structural gamma map provides both geometric and dosimetric information on PSQA results, allowing straightforward clinical interpretation. The proposed structure-based gamma method accounts for dose tolerances for specific anatomical structures. This method can provide a clinically useful method to assess and communicate PSQA results, offering radiation oncologists a more intuitive way of examining agreement in surrounding critical normal structures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10480250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104802502023-09-07 A structure-based gamma evaluation method for identifying clinically relevant dose differences in organs at risk Yu, Liting Baker, Anthony Kairn, Tanya Livingstone, Alexander Trapp, Jamie Crowe, Scott B Phys Eng Sci Med Scientific Paper Gamma evaluation is currently the most widely used dose comparison method for patient specific quality assurance (PSQA). However, existing methods for normalising the dose difference, using either the dose at the global maximum dose point or at each local point, can respectively lead to under- and over-sensitivity to dose differences in organ-at-risk structures. This may be of concern for plan evaluation from clinical perspectives. This study has explored and proposed a new method called structural gamma, which takes structural dose tolerances into consideration while performing gamma analysis for PSQA. As a demonstration of the structural gamma method, a total of 78 retrospective plans on four treatment sites were re-calculated on an in-house Monte Carlo system and compared with doses calculated from the treatment planning system. Structural gamma evaluations were performed using both QUANTEC dose tolerances and radiation oncologist specified dose tolerances, then compared with conventional global and local gamma evaluations. Results demonstrated that structural gamma evaluation is especially sensitive to errors in structures with restrictive dose constraints. The structural gamma map provides both geometric and dosimetric information on PSQA results, allowing straightforward clinical interpretation. The proposed structure-based gamma method accounts for dose tolerances for specific anatomical structures. This method can provide a clinically useful method to assess and communicate PSQA results, offering radiation oncologists a more intuitive way of examining agreement in surrounding critical normal structures. Springer International Publishing 2023-05-23 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10480250/ /pubmed/37219798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13246-023-01270-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Scientific Paper
Yu, Liting
Baker, Anthony
Kairn, Tanya
Livingstone, Alexander
Trapp, Jamie
Crowe, Scott B
A structure-based gamma evaluation method for identifying clinically relevant dose differences in organs at risk
title A structure-based gamma evaluation method for identifying clinically relevant dose differences in organs at risk
title_full A structure-based gamma evaluation method for identifying clinically relevant dose differences in organs at risk
title_fullStr A structure-based gamma evaluation method for identifying clinically relevant dose differences in organs at risk
title_full_unstemmed A structure-based gamma evaluation method for identifying clinically relevant dose differences in organs at risk
title_short A structure-based gamma evaluation method for identifying clinically relevant dose differences in organs at risk
title_sort structure-based gamma evaluation method for identifying clinically relevant dose differences in organs at risk
topic Scientific Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10480250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37219798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13246-023-01270-3
work_keys_str_mv AT yuliting astructurebasedgammaevaluationmethodforidentifyingclinicallyrelevantdosedifferencesinorgansatrisk
AT bakeranthony astructurebasedgammaevaluationmethodforidentifyingclinicallyrelevantdosedifferencesinorgansatrisk
AT kairntanya astructurebasedgammaevaluationmethodforidentifyingclinicallyrelevantdosedifferencesinorgansatrisk
AT livingstonealexander astructurebasedgammaevaluationmethodforidentifyingclinicallyrelevantdosedifferencesinorgansatrisk
AT trappjamie astructurebasedgammaevaluationmethodforidentifyingclinicallyrelevantdosedifferencesinorgansatrisk
AT crowescottb astructurebasedgammaevaluationmethodforidentifyingclinicallyrelevantdosedifferencesinorgansatrisk
AT yuliting structurebasedgammaevaluationmethodforidentifyingclinicallyrelevantdosedifferencesinorgansatrisk
AT bakeranthony structurebasedgammaevaluationmethodforidentifyingclinicallyrelevantdosedifferencesinorgansatrisk
AT kairntanya structurebasedgammaevaluationmethodforidentifyingclinicallyrelevantdosedifferencesinorgansatrisk
AT livingstonealexander structurebasedgammaevaluationmethodforidentifyingclinicallyrelevantdosedifferencesinorgansatrisk
AT trappjamie structurebasedgammaevaluationmethodforidentifyingclinicallyrelevantdosedifferencesinorgansatrisk
AT crowescottb structurebasedgammaevaluationmethodforidentifyingclinicallyrelevantdosedifferencesinorgansatrisk