Cargando…
Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study
Aortic stenosis is a condition which is fatal if left untreated. Novel quantitative imaging techniques which better characterise transvalvular pressure drops are being developed but require refinement and validation. A customisable and cost-effective workbench valve phantom circuit capable of replic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10480252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36745287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-022-10350-w |
_version_ | 1785101753135398912 |
---|---|
author | Gill, Harminder Fernandes, Joao Filipe Nio, Amanda Dockerill, Cameron Shah, Nili Ahmed, Naajia Raymond, Jason Wang, Shu Sotelo, Julio Urbina, Jesus Uribe, Sergio Rajani, Ronak Rhode, Kawal Lamata, Pablo |
author_facet | Gill, Harminder Fernandes, Joao Filipe Nio, Amanda Dockerill, Cameron Shah, Nili Ahmed, Naajia Raymond, Jason Wang, Shu Sotelo, Julio Urbina, Jesus Uribe, Sergio Rajani, Ronak Rhode, Kawal Lamata, Pablo |
author_sort | Gill, Harminder |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aortic stenosis is a condition which is fatal if left untreated. Novel quantitative imaging techniques which better characterise transvalvular pressure drops are being developed but require refinement and validation. A customisable and cost-effective workbench valve phantom circuit capable of replicating valve mechanics and pathology was created. The reproducibility and relationship of differing haemodynamic metrics were assessed from ground truth pressure data alongside imaging compatibility. The phantom met the requirements to capture ground truth pressure data alongside ultrasound and magnetic resonance image compatibility. The reproducibility was successfully tested. The robustness of three different pressure drop metrics was assessed: whilst the peak and net pressure drops provide a robust assessment of the stenotic burden in our phantom, the peak-to-peak pressure drop is a metric that is confounded by non-valvular factors such as wave reflection. The peak-to-peak pressure drop is a metric that should be reconsidered in clinical practice. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: The left panel shows manufacture of low cost, functional valves. The central section demonstrates circuit layout, representative MRI and US images alongside gross valve morphologies. The right panel shows the different pressure drop metrics that were assessed for reproducibility [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12265-022-10350-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10480252 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104802522023-09-07 Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study Gill, Harminder Fernandes, Joao Filipe Nio, Amanda Dockerill, Cameron Shah, Nili Ahmed, Naajia Raymond, Jason Wang, Shu Sotelo, Julio Urbina, Jesus Uribe, Sergio Rajani, Ronak Rhode, Kawal Lamata, Pablo J Cardiovasc Transl Res Original Article Aortic stenosis is a condition which is fatal if left untreated. Novel quantitative imaging techniques which better characterise transvalvular pressure drops are being developed but require refinement and validation. A customisable and cost-effective workbench valve phantom circuit capable of replicating valve mechanics and pathology was created. The reproducibility and relationship of differing haemodynamic metrics were assessed from ground truth pressure data alongside imaging compatibility. The phantom met the requirements to capture ground truth pressure data alongside ultrasound and magnetic resonance image compatibility. The reproducibility was successfully tested. The robustness of three different pressure drop metrics was assessed: whilst the peak and net pressure drops provide a robust assessment of the stenotic burden in our phantom, the peak-to-peak pressure drop is a metric that is confounded by non-valvular factors such as wave reflection. The peak-to-peak pressure drop is a metric that should be reconsidered in clinical practice. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: The left panel shows manufacture of low cost, functional valves. The central section demonstrates circuit layout, representative MRI and US images alongside gross valve morphologies. The right panel shows the different pressure drop metrics that were assessed for reproducibility [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12265-022-10350-w. Springer US 2023-02-06 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10480252/ /pubmed/36745287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-022-10350-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gill, Harminder Fernandes, Joao Filipe Nio, Amanda Dockerill, Cameron Shah, Nili Ahmed, Naajia Raymond, Jason Wang, Shu Sotelo, Julio Urbina, Jesus Uribe, Sergio Rajani, Ronak Rhode, Kawal Lamata, Pablo Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study |
title | Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study |
title_full | Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study |
title_fullStr | Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study |
title_short | Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study |
title_sort | aortic stenosis: haemodynamic benchmark and metric reliability study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10480252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36745287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-022-10350-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gillharminder aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy AT fernandesjoaofilipe aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy AT nioamanda aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy AT dockerillcameron aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy AT shahnili aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy AT ahmednaajia aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy AT raymondjason aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy AT wangshu aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy AT sotelojulio aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy AT urbinajesus aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy AT uribesergio aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy AT rajanironak aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy AT rhodekawal aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy AT lamatapablo aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy |