Cargando…

Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study

Aortic stenosis is a condition which is fatal if left untreated. Novel quantitative imaging techniques which better characterise transvalvular pressure drops are being developed but require refinement and validation. A customisable and cost-effective workbench valve phantom circuit capable of replic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gill, Harminder, Fernandes, Joao Filipe, Nio, Amanda, Dockerill, Cameron, Shah, Nili, Ahmed, Naajia, Raymond, Jason, Wang, Shu, Sotelo, Julio, Urbina, Jesus, Uribe, Sergio, Rajani, Ronak, Rhode, Kawal, Lamata, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10480252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36745287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-022-10350-w
_version_ 1785101753135398912
author Gill, Harminder
Fernandes, Joao Filipe
Nio, Amanda
Dockerill, Cameron
Shah, Nili
Ahmed, Naajia
Raymond, Jason
Wang, Shu
Sotelo, Julio
Urbina, Jesus
Uribe, Sergio
Rajani, Ronak
Rhode, Kawal
Lamata, Pablo
author_facet Gill, Harminder
Fernandes, Joao Filipe
Nio, Amanda
Dockerill, Cameron
Shah, Nili
Ahmed, Naajia
Raymond, Jason
Wang, Shu
Sotelo, Julio
Urbina, Jesus
Uribe, Sergio
Rajani, Ronak
Rhode, Kawal
Lamata, Pablo
author_sort Gill, Harminder
collection PubMed
description Aortic stenosis is a condition which is fatal if left untreated. Novel quantitative imaging techniques which better characterise transvalvular pressure drops are being developed but require refinement and validation. A customisable and cost-effective workbench valve phantom circuit capable of replicating valve mechanics and pathology was created. The reproducibility and relationship of differing haemodynamic metrics were assessed from ground truth pressure data alongside imaging compatibility. The phantom met the requirements to capture ground truth pressure data alongside ultrasound and magnetic resonance image compatibility. The reproducibility was successfully tested. The robustness of three different pressure drop metrics was assessed: whilst the peak and net pressure drops provide a robust assessment of the stenotic burden in our phantom, the peak-to-peak pressure drop is a metric that is confounded by non-valvular factors such as wave reflection. The peak-to-peak pressure drop is a metric that should be reconsidered in clinical practice. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: The left panel shows manufacture of low cost, functional valves. The central section demonstrates circuit layout, representative MRI and US images alongside gross valve morphologies. The right panel shows the different pressure drop metrics that were assessed for reproducibility [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12265-022-10350-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10480252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104802522023-09-07 Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study Gill, Harminder Fernandes, Joao Filipe Nio, Amanda Dockerill, Cameron Shah, Nili Ahmed, Naajia Raymond, Jason Wang, Shu Sotelo, Julio Urbina, Jesus Uribe, Sergio Rajani, Ronak Rhode, Kawal Lamata, Pablo J Cardiovasc Transl Res Original Article Aortic stenosis is a condition which is fatal if left untreated. Novel quantitative imaging techniques which better characterise transvalvular pressure drops are being developed but require refinement and validation. A customisable and cost-effective workbench valve phantom circuit capable of replicating valve mechanics and pathology was created. The reproducibility and relationship of differing haemodynamic metrics were assessed from ground truth pressure data alongside imaging compatibility. The phantom met the requirements to capture ground truth pressure data alongside ultrasound and magnetic resonance image compatibility. The reproducibility was successfully tested. The robustness of three different pressure drop metrics was assessed: whilst the peak and net pressure drops provide a robust assessment of the stenotic burden in our phantom, the peak-to-peak pressure drop is a metric that is confounded by non-valvular factors such as wave reflection. The peak-to-peak pressure drop is a metric that should be reconsidered in clinical practice. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: The left panel shows manufacture of low cost, functional valves. The central section demonstrates circuit layout, representative MRI and US images alongside gross valve morphologies. The right panel shows the different pressure drop metrics that were assessed for reproducibility [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12265-022-10350-w. Springer US 2023-02-06 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10480252/ /pubmed/36745287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-022-10350-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Gill, Harminder
Fernandes, Joao Filipe
Nio, Amanda
Dockerill, Cameron
Shah, Nili
Ahmed, Naajia
Raymond, Jason
Wang, Shu
Sotelo, Julio
Urbina, Jesus
Uribe, Sergio
Rajani, Ronak
Rhode, Kawal
Lamata, Pablo
Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study
title Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study
title_full Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study
title_fullStr Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study
title_full_unstemmed Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study
title_short Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study
title_sort aortic stenosis: haemodynamic benchmark and metric reliability study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10480252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36745287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-022-10350-w
work_keys_str_mv AT gillharminder aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy
AT fernandesjoaofilipe aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy
AT nioamanda aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy
AT dockerillcameron aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy
AT shahnili aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy
AT ahmednaajia aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy
AT raymondjason aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy
AT wangshu aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy
AT sotelojulio aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy
AT urbinajesus aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy
AT uribesergio aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy
AT rajanironak aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy
AT rhodekawal aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy
AT lamatapablo aorticstenosishaemodynamicbenchmarkandmetricreliabilitystudy