Cargando…

Combination of deep learning and ensemble machine learning using intraoperative video images strongly predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: We recently reported the importance of deep learning (DL) of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging in predicting the degree of urinary incontinence (UI) following robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). However, our results were limited because the prediction accuracy was approximately...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakamura, Wataru, Sumitomo, Makoto, Zennami, Kenji, Takenaka, Masashi, Ichino, Manabu, Takahara, Kiyoshi, Teramoto, Atsushi, Shiroki, Ryoichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10480482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37449339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1861
_version_ 1785101796445782016
author Nakamura, Wataru
Sumitomo, Makoto
Zennami, Kenji
Takenaka, Masashi
Ichino, Manabu
Takahara, Kiyoshi
Teramoto, Atsushi
Shiroki, Ryoichi
author_facet Nakamura, Wataru
Sumitomo, Makoto
Zennami, Kenji
Takenaka, Masashi
Ichino, Manabu
Takahara, Kiyoshi
Teramoto, Atsushi
Shiroki, Ryoichi
author_sort Nakamura, Wataru
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We recently reported the importance of deep learning (DL) of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging in predicting the degree of urinary incontinence (UI) following robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). However, our results were limited because the prediction accuracy was approximately 70%. AIM: To develop a more precise prediction model that can inform patients about UI recovery post‐RARP surgery using a DL model based on intraoperative video images. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study cohort comprised of 101 patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing RARP. Three snapshots from intraoperative video recordings showing the pelvic cavity (prior to bladder neck incision, immediately following prostate removal, and after vesicourethral anastomosis) were evaluated, including pre‐ and intraoperative parameters. We evaluated the DL model plus simple or ensemble machine learning (ML), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was analyzed through sensitivity and specificity. Of 101, 64 and 37 patients demonstrated “early continence (using 0 or 1 safety pad at 3 months post‐RARP)” and “late continence (others),” respectively, at 3 months postoperatively. The combination of DL and simple ML using intraoperative video snapshots with clinicopathological parameters had a notably high performance (AUC, 0.683–0.749) to predict early recovery from UI after surgery. Furthermore, combining DL with ensemble artificial neural network using intraoperative video snapshots had the highest performance (AUC, 0.882; sensitivity, 92.2%; specificity, 78.4%; overall accuracy, 85.3%) to predict early recovery from post‐RARP incontinence, with similar results by internal validation. The addition of clinicopathological parameters showed no additive effects for each analysis using DL, EL and simple ML. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the DL algorithm with intraoperative video imaging is a reliable method for informing patients about the severity of their recovery from UI after RARP, although it is not clear if our methods are reproducible for predicting long‐term UI and pad‐free continence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10480482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104804822023-09-07 Combination of deep learning and ensemble machine learning using intraoperative video images strongly predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy Nakamura, Wataru Sumitomo, Makoto Zennami, Kenji Takenaka, Masashi Ichino, Manabu Takahara, Kiyoshi Teramoto, Atsushi Shiroki, Ryoichi Cancer Rep (Hoboken) Original Articles BACKGROUND: We recently reported the importance of deep learning (DL) of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging in predicting the degree of urinary incontinence (UI) following robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). However, our results were limited because the prediction accuracy was approximately 70%. AIM: To develop a more precise prediction model that can inform patients about UI recovery post‐RARP surgery using a DL model based on intraoperative video images. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study cohort comprised of 101 patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing RARP. Three snapshots from intraoperative video recordings showing the pelvic cavity (prior to bladder neck incision, immediately following prostate removal, and after vesicourethral anastomosis) were evaluated, including pre‐ and intraoperative parameters. We evaluated the DL model plus simple or ensemble machine learning (ML), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was analyzed through sensitivity and specificity. Of 101, 64 and 37 patients demonstrated “early continence (using 0 or 1 safety pad at 3 months post‐RARP)” and “late continence (others),” respectively, at 3 months postoperatively. The combination of DL and simple ML using intraoperative video snapshots with clinicopathological parameters had a notably high performance (AUC, 0.683–0.749) to predict early recovery from UI after surgery. Furthermore, combining DL with ensemble artificial neural network using intraoperative video snapshots had the highest performance (AUC, 0.882; sensitivity, 92.2%; specificity, 78.4%; overall accuracy, 85.3%) to predict early recovery from post‐RARP incontinence, with similar results by internal validation. The addition of clinicopathological parameters showed no additive effects for each analysis using DL, EL and simple ML. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the DL algorithm with intraoperative video imaging is a reliable method for informing patients about the severity of their recovery from UI after RARP, although it is not clear if our methods are reproducible for predicting long‐term UI and pad‐free continence. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10480482/ /pubmed/37449339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1861 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Nakamura, Wataru
Sumitomo, Makoto
Zennami, Kenji
Takenaka, Masashi
Ichino, Manabu
Takahara, Kiyoshi
Teramoto, Atsushi
Shiroki, Ryoichi
Combination of deep learning and ensemble machine learning using intraoperative video images strongly predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy
title Combination of deep learning and ensemble machine learning using intraoperative video images strongly predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy
title_full Combination of deep learning and ensemble machine learning using intraoperative video images strongly predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr Combination of deep learning and ensemble machine learning using intraoperative video images strongly predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Combination of deep learning and ensemble machine learning using intraoperative video images strongly predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy
title_short Combination of deep learning and ensemble machine learning using intraoperative video images strongly predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy
title_sort combination of deep learning and ensemble machine learning using intraoperative video images strongly predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10480482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37449339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1861
work_keys_str_mv AT nakamurawataru combinationofdeeplearningandensemblemachinelearningusingintraoperativevideoimagesstronglypredictsrecoveryofurinarycontinenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT sumitomomakoto combinationofdeeplearningandensemblemachinelearningusingintraoperativevideoimagesstronglypredictsrecoveryofurinarycontinenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT zennamikenji combinationofdeeplearningandensemblemachinelearningusingintraoperativevideoimagesstronglypredictsrecoveryofurinarycontinenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT takenakamasashi combinationofdeeplearningandensemblemachinelearningusingintraoperativevideoimagesstronglypredictsrecoveryofurinarycontinenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT ichinomanabu combinationofdeeplearningandensemblemachinelearningusingintraoperativevideoimagesstronglypredictsrecoveryofurinarycontinenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT takaharakiyoshi combinationofdeeplearningandensemblemachinelearningusingintraoperativevideoimagesstronglypredictsrecoveryofurinarycontinenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT teramotoatsushi combinationofdeeplearningandensemblemachinelearningusingintraoperativevideoimagesstronglypredictsrecoveryofurinarycontinenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT shirokiryoichi combinationofdeeplearningandensemblemachinelearningusingintraoperativevideoimagesstronglypredictsrecoveryofurinarycontinenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy