Does patient’s position count during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-pancreatography? Left lateral decubitus versus prone position

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of left lateral decubitus versus prone position during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreaticography (ERCP). METHODS: This prospective single-centre cohort study was carried out at Pak Emirates Military Hospital from January to June 2021. Patients requiring ERCP were subsequently allotted LL or PP group randomly (unequal randomization) except patients with recent abdominal surgery, in-dwelling catheters, raised intra-abdominal pressure, cervical spine abnormalities and limb contractures. Qualitative data was analysed using frequencies and chi square statistics whereas, quantitative data was analysed using mean±SD and student T or Mann Whitney U-test. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients were enrolled according to the inclusion criteria with 62(54%) males and majority of the patients (42%) belonging to the age group 31-45 years. The most common ERCP indication was choledocholithiasis (36%). Technical success was achieved in 109(96%) patients with no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The total time of procedure, time for deep cannulation, time for acquiring therapeutic goal and ERCP complexity level were all similar between the two groups. The rate of inadvertent PD cannulation and PEP were relatively higher for the PP group but were statistically non-significant through univariate and logistic regression analyses and the only outcome measure that showed significance was multiple cannulations in the PP group. CONCLUSION: The study concludes that LL is non-inferior to PP and both positions have comparable outcomes with non-significant differences in terms of technical success rate, complications (specifically PEP), total procedure time, time required for deep cannulation and attainment of goal, ERCP complexity level and inadvertent PD cannulation.