Cargando…
Voting for a Male Warrior or Female Peacekeeper? Testing the Evolutionary Contingency Hypothesis in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Elections
The present research replicates and extends previous literature on the evolutionary contingency hypothesis of leadership emergence. Using artificially masculinized versus feminized versions of the faces of the candidates for the 2016 U.S. presidential elections, we demonstrated that different contex...
Autores principales: | Grabo, Allen, van Vugt, Mark |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10480936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29911423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474704918773267 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Sexual Disgust Trumps Pathogen Disgust in Predicting Voter Behavior During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
por: Billingsley, Joseph, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Public Reactions to Male Versus Female Terrorism: Experimental Evidence for the Male Warrior Hypothesis
por: Lindner, Miriam
Publicado: (2018) -
Presidential, But Not Prime Minister, Candidates With Lower Pitched Voices Stand a Better Chance of Winning the Election in Conservative Countries
por: Banai, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Warriors and Peacekeepers: Testing a Biosocial Implicit Leadership Hypothesis of Intergroup Relations Using Masculine and Feminine Faces
por: Spisak, Brian R., et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
County community health associations of net voting shift in the 2016 U.S. presidential election
por: Wasfy, Jason H., et al.
Publicado: (2017)