Cargando…

Oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) represents the gold standard treatment for non-metastatic upper tract urothelial cancer. We sought to provide a comprehensive review of reported oncologic outcomes of the RNU procedure and of factors that might impact these outcomes. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grob, Gabrielle, Rogers, Devin, Pandolfo, Savio D., Vourganti, Srinivas, Buscarini, Maurizio, Mehrazin, Reza, Grob, B. Mayer, Mir, Maria C., Perdonà, Sisto, Derweesh, Ithaar H., Franco, Antonio, Cherullo, Edward E., Hemal, Ashok K., Autorino, Riccardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37680219
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-22-882
_version_ 1785101923964157952
author Grob, Gabrielle
Rogers, Devin
Pandolfo, Savio D.
Vourganti, Srinivas
Buscarini, Maurizio
Mehrazin, Reza
Grob, B. Mayer
Mir, Maria C.
Perdonà, Sisto
Derweesh, Ithaar H.
Franco, Antonio
Cherullo, Edward E.
Hemal, Ashok K.
Autorino, Riccardo
author_facet Grob, Gabrielle
Rogers, Devin
Pandolfo, Savio D.
Vourganti, Srinivas
Buscarini, Maurizio
Mehrazin, Reza
Grob, B. Mayer
Mir, Maria C.
Perdonà, Sisto
Derweesh, Ithaar H.
Franco, Antonio
Cherullo, Edward E.
Hemal, Ashok K.
Autorino, Riccardo
author_sort Grob, Gabrielle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) represents the gold standard treatment for non-metastatic upper tract urothelial cancer. We sought to provide a comprehensive review of reported oncologic outcomes of the RNU procedure and of factors that might impact these outcomes. METHODS: A non-systematic review of the literature was conducted by performing an electronic literature search using PubMed with “radical nephroureterectomy” and “oncologic outcomes” as free text search terms. Both original articles and systematic reviews were considered. Search was limited to articles in English that were published in the last 20 years. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Open and laparoscopic RNU offer comparable oncologic outcomes. In more recent years, the discussion has de facto shifted towards the “oncological safety” of robotic RNU, which also seems to offer comparable oncologic outcomes. Several studies have looked at the impact of different treatment-, patient- and tumor-related factors. Among treatment-related factors, attention has been given to diagnostic ureteroscopy and the risk of intravesical recurrence. Surgical wait time and perioperative blood transfusion have also been studied. Perioperative chemotherapy, specifically adjuvant therapy, was shown to improve survival. Among patient-related factors, baseline chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, and systemic inflammation have gained recent attention. Some tumor related factors, such as stage, grade, location, and multifocality may negatively impact survival outcomes. Lymphovascular invasion and histologic variants are clinically significant pathological findings. CONCLUSIONS: RNU is a procedure with measured long-term oncologic outcomes. Minimally invasive techniques have gained an established role as they seem to offer comparable oncologic “safety”, although special attention is needed in relation to the method of bladder cuff excision. Robotic RNU is gaining popularity, and while evidence remains limited, the current literature supports the oncologic safety of this procedure. Several factors, which can be categorized as treatment-related, patient-related, and tumor-related, might impact the oncologic outcomes of UTUC patients undergoing RNU. These factors can provide crucial information to stratify patients based on their relative risk of disease recurrence and mortality which may guide clinical decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10481200
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104812002023-09-07 Oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review Grob, Gabrielle Rogers, Devin Pandolfo, Savio D. Vourganti, Srinivas Buscarini, Maurizio Mehrazin, Reza Grob, B. Mayer Mir, Maria C. Perdonà, Sisto Derweesh, Ithaar H. Franco, Antonio Cherullo, Edward E. Hemal, Ashok K. Autorino, Riccardo Transl Androl Urol Review Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) represents the gold standard treatment for non-metastatic upper tract urothelial cancer. We sought to provide a comprehensive review of reported oncologic outcomes of the RNU procedure and of factors that might impact these outcomes. METHODS: A non-systematic review of the literature was conducted by performing an electronic literature search using PubMed with “radical nephroureterectomy” and “oncologic outcomes” as free text search terms. Both original articles and systematic reviews were considered. Search was limited to articles in English that were published in the last 20 years. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Open and laparoscopic RNU offer comparable oncologic outcomes. In more recent years, the discussion has de facto shifted towards the “oncological safety” of robotic RNU, which also seems to offer comparable oncologic outcomes. Several studies have looked at the impact of different treatment-, patient- and tumor-related factors. Among treatment-related factors, attention has been given to diagnostic ureteroscopy and the risk of intravesical recurrence. Surgical wait time and perioperative blood transfusion have also been studied. Perioperative chemotherapy, specifically adjuvant therapy, was shown to improve survival. Among patient-related factors, baseline chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, and systemic inflammation have gained recent attention. Some tumor related factors, such as stage, grade, location, and multifocality may negatively impact survival outcomes. Lymphovascular invasion and histologic variants are clinically significant pathological findings. CONCLUSIONS: RNU is a procedure with measured long-term oncologic outcomes. Minimally invasive techniques have gained an established role as they seem to offer comparable oncologic “safety”, although special attention is needed in relation to the method of bladder cuff excision. Robotic RNU is gaining popularity, and while evidence remains limited, the current literature supports the oncologic safety of this procedure. Several factors, which can be categorized as treatment-related, patient-related, and tumor-related, might impact the oncologic outcomes of UTUC patients undergoing RNU. These factors can provide crucial information to stratify patients based on their relative risk of disease recurrence and mortality which may guide clinical decision-making. AME Publishing Company 2023-07-28 2023-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10481200/ /pubmed/37680219 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-22-882 Text en 2023 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Grob, Gabrielle
Rogers, Devin
Pandolfo, Savio D.
Vourganti, Srinivas
Buscarini, Maurizio
Mehrazin, Reza
Grob, B. Mayer
Mir, Maria C.
Perdonà, Sisto
Derweesh, Ithaar H.
Franco, Antonio
Cherullo, Edward E.
Hemal, Ashok K.
Autorino, Riccardo
Oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review
title Oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review
title_full Oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review
title_fullStr Oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review
title_full_unstemmed Oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review
title_short Oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review
title_sort oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37680219
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-22-882
work_keys_str_mv AT grobgabrielle oncologicoutcomesfollowingradicalnephroureterectomyforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaaliteraturereview
AT rogersdevin oncologicoutcomesfollowingradicalnephroureterectomyforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaaliteraturereview
AT pandolfosaviod oncologicoutcomesfollowingradicalnephroureterectomyforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaaliteraturereview
AT vourgantisrinivas oncologicoutcomesfollowingradicalnephroureterectomyforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaaliteraturereview
AT buscarinimaurizio oncologicoutcomesfollowingradicalnephroureterectomyforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaaliteraturereview
AT mehrazinreza oncologicoutcomesfollowingradicalnephroureterectomyforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaaliteraturereview
AT grobbmayer oncologicoutcomesfollowingradicalnephroureterectomyforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaaliteraturereview
AT mirmariac oncologicoutcomesfollowingradicalnephroureterectomyforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaaliteraturereview
AT perdonasisto oncologicoutcomesfollowingradicalnephroureterectomyforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaaliteraturereview
AT derweeshithaarh oncologicoutcomesfollowingradicalnephroureterectomyforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaaliteraturereview
AT francoantonio oncologicoutcomesfollowingradicalnephroureterectomyforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaaliteraturereview
AT cherulloedwarde oncologicoutcomesfollowingradicalnephroureterectomyforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaaliteraturereview
AT hemalashokk oncologicoutcomesfollowingradicalnephroureterectomyforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaaliteraturereview
AT autorinoriccardo oncologicoutcomesfollowingradicalnephroureterectomyforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaaliteraturereview