Cargando…

Oblique supine position versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the oblique supine position (OSP) and the prone position (PP). AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OSP versus PP for PCNL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A syste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hu, Yang, Zhan, Chang, Xueliang, Wang, Yaxuan, Li, Jingdong, Han, Zhenwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37680735
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2023.126453
_version_ 1785101974348234752
author Wang, Hu
Yang, Zhan
Chang, Xueliang
Wang, Yaxuan
Li, Jingdong
Han, Zhenwei
author_facet Wang, Hu
Yang, Zhan
Chang, Xueliang
Wang, Yaxuan
Li, Jingdong
Han, Zhenwei
author_sort Wang, Hu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the oblique supine position (OSP) and the prone position (PP). AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OSP versus PP for PCNL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Ovid, SCOPUS, and citation lists was conducted to identify eligible comparative studies up to November 2022. All studies comparing OSP versus PP for PCNL were included. Statistical analysis was performed with the Collaboration’s Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 software. RESULTS: Overall, eight studies were included involving 1185 patients (OSP = 634; PP = 551). There were no statistically significant differences between OSP and PP in age (WMD = –0.95 years; 95% CI: –2.12 to 0.21; p = 0.83) or proportion of male patients (OR = 0.02; 95% CI: –0.03 to 0.08; p = 0.43). We found that OSP was performed more frequently for smaller stone size and patients with higher BMI (WMD = –0.1 cm, 95% CI: –0.18 to –0.02; p = 0.01) and patients with higher BMI (WMD = 0.66 kg/m(2); 95% CI: 0.29 to 1.03; p = 0.0005). The operation time was shorter in OSP than PP (WMD = –14 min; 95% CI: –27.00 to –1.00; p = 0.03). The reduction of hemoglobin was lower in OSP than PP (WMD = –0.39 g/dl; 95% CI: –0.60 to –0.13; p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in stone-free rate and hospitalization between the two groups (OR = 1.32; 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.78; p = 0.07; WMD = –5.99 h; 95% CI: –17.15 to 5.16; p = 0.29). The overall complications were fewer in OSP than in PP (OR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.81; p = 0.001), but no difference was observed between the positions with regard to the major complications (Clavien-Dindo score ≥ 3) (OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.34; p = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: OSP showed non-inferior stone-free rate, blood loss, and hospitalization compared with PP. OSP may be superior in terms of operative time and complications than PP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10481440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104814402023-09-07 Oblique supine position versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Hu Yang, Zhan Chang, Xueliang Wang, Yaxuan Li, Jingdong Han, Zhenwei Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Meta-Analysis INTRODUCTION: To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the oblique supine position (OSP) and the prone position (PP). AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OSP versus PP for PCNL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Ovid, SCOPUS, and citation lists was conducted to identify eligible comparative studies up to November 2022. All studies comparing OSP versus PP for PCNL were included. Statistical analysis was performed with the Collaboration’s Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 software. RESULTS: Overall, eight studies were included involving 1185 patients (OSP = 634; PP = 551). There were no statistically significant differences between OSP and PP in age (WMD = –0.95 years; 95% CI: –2.12 to 0.21; p = 0.83) or proportion of male patients (OR = 0.02; 95% CI: –0.03 to 0.08; p = 0.43). We found that OSP was performed more frequently for smaller stone size and patients with higher BMI (WMD = –0.1 cm, 95% CI: –0.18 to –0.02; p = 0.01) and patients with higher BMI (WMD = 0.66 kg/m(2); 95% CI: 0.29 to 1.03; p = 0.0005). The operation time was shorter in OSP than PP (WMD = –14 min; 95% CI: –27.00 to –1.00; p = 0.03). The reduction of hemoglobin was lower in OSP than PP (WMD = –0.39 g/dl; 95% CI: –0.60 to –0.13; p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in stone-free rate and hospitalization between the two groups (OR = 1.32; 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.78; p = 0.07; WMD = –5.99 h; 95% CI: –17.15 to 5.16; p = 0.29). The overall complications were fewer in OSP than in PP (OR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.81; p = 0.001), but no difference was observed between the positions with regard to the major complications (Clavien-Dindo score ≥ 3) (OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.34; p = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: OSP showed non-inferior stone-free rate, blood loss, and hospitalization compared with PP. OSP may be superior in terms of operative time and complications than PP. Termedia Publishing House 2023-04-06 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10481440/ /pubmed/37680735 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2023.126453 Text en Copyright © 2023 Sekcja Wideochirurgii TChP https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Wang, Hu
Yang, Zhan
Chang, Xueliang
Wang, Yaxuan
Li, Jingdong
Han, Zhenwei
Oblique supine position versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Oblique supine position versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Oblique supine position versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Oblique supine position versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Oblique supine position versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Oblique supine position versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort oblique supine position versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37680735
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2023.126453
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghu obliquesupinepositionversuspronepositionforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangzhan obliquesupinepositionversuspronepositionforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT changxueliang obliquesupinepositionversuspronepositionforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangyaxuan obliquesupinepositionversuspronepositionforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lijingdong obliquesupinepositionversuspronepositionforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanzhenwei obliquesupinepositionversuspronepositionforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis