Cargando…

Using the COM-B framework to elucidate facilitators and barriers to COVID-19 vaccine uptake in pregnant women: a qualitative study

Since April 2021, COVID-19 vaccines have been recommended for pregnant women. Despite this, COVID-19 vaccine uptake in this group is low compared to the non-pregnant population of childbearing age. Our aim was to understand barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccine uptake among pregnant women in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patterson, Lynsey, Berry, Emma, Parsons, Carole, Clarke, Bronagh, Little, Alison, Beggs, Jillian, Chuter, Antony, Jackson, Tracy, Hsia, Yingfen, McGrath, Hannah, Millman, Catherine, Murphy, Siobhan, Bradley, Declan T., Milligan, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37674175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05958-y
_version_ 1785101981467017216
author Patterson, Lynsey
Berry, Emma
Parsons, Carole
Clarke, Bronagh
Little, Alison
Beggs, Jillian
Chuter, Antony
Jackson, Tracy
Hsia, Yingfen
McGrath, Hannah
Millman, Catherine
Murphy, Siobhan
Bradley, Declan T.
Milligan, Sarah
author_facet Patterson, Lynsey
Berry, Emma
Parsons, Carole
Clarke, Bronagh
Little, Alison
Beggs, Jillian
Chuter, Antony
Jackson, Tracy
Hsia, Yingfen
McGrath, Hannah
Millman, Catherine
Murphy, Siobhan
Bradley, Declan T.
Milligan, Sarah
author_sort Patterson, Lynsey
collection PubMed
description Since April 2021, COVID-19 vaccines have been recommended for pregnant women. Despite this, COVID-19 vaccine uptake in this group is low compared to the non-pregnant population of childbearing age. Our aim was to understand barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccine uptake among pregnant women in Northern Ireland using the COM-B framework, and so to make recommendations for public health interventions. The COM-B proposes that human behaviour is influenced by the extent to which a person has the capability, opportunity, and motivation to enact that behaviour. Understanding the factors underpinning behaviour through this lens helps discern what needs to change to change behaviour, therefore supporting the development of targeted interventions. This study consisted of eight semi-structured interviews with new/expectant mothers who did not receive a COVID-19 vaccine dose while pregnant since April 2021, and a focus group with five participants who received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose while pregnant. Interview and focus group data were analysed using semi-deductive reflexive thematic analysis framed by a subtle realist approach. The COM-B was used to categorise codes and subthemes were developed within each COM-B construct. Within Psychological Capability, subthemes captured the need for consistent and reliable COVID-19 vaccine information and access to balanced and jargon-free, risk–benefit information that is tailored to the pregnant individual. The behaviour/opinions of family, friends, and local healthcare providers had a powerful influence on COVID-19 vaccine decisions (Social Opportunity). Integrating the COVID-19 vaccine as part of routine antenatal pathways was believed to support access and sense of familiarity (Physical Opportunity). Participants valued health autonomy, however experienced internal conflict driven by concerns about long-term side effects for their baby (Reflective Motivation). Feelings of fear, lack of empathy from healthcare providers, and anticipated guilt commonly underpinned indecision as to whether to get the vaccine (Automatic Motivation). Our study highlighted that the choice to accept a vaccine during pregnancy generates internal conflict and worry. Several participants cited their concern was primarily around the safety for their baby. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) play a significant part when it comes to decision making about COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant women. HCPs and pregnant women should be involved in the development of interventions to improve the delivery and communication of information. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-023-05958-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10481472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104814722023-09-07 Using the COM-B framework to elucidate facilitators and barriers to COVID-19 vaccine uptake in pregnant women: a qualitative study Patterson, Lynsey Berry, Emma Parsons, Carole Clarke, Bronagh Little, Alison Beggs, Jillian Chuter, Antony Jackson, Tracy Hsia, Yingfen McGrath, Hannah Millman, Catherine Murphy, Siobhan Bradley, Declan T. Milligan, Sarah BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Since April 2021, COVID-19 vaccines have been recommended for pregnant women. Despite this, COVID-19 vaccine uptake in this group is low compared to the non-pregnant population of childbearing age. Our aim was to understand barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccine uptake among pregnant women in Northern Ireland using the COM-B framework, and so to make recommendations for public health interventions. The COM-B proposes that human behaviour is influenced by the extent to which a person has the capability, opportunity, and motivation to enact that behaviour. Understanding the factors underpinning behaviour through this lens helps discern what needs to change to change behaviour, therefore supporting the development of targeted interventions. This study consisted of eight semi-structured interviews with new/expectant mothers who did not receive a COVID-19 vaccine dose while pregnant since April 2021, and a focus group with five participants who received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose while pregnant. Interview and focus group data were analysed using semi-deductive reflexive thematic analysis framed by a subtle realist approach. The COM-B was used to categorise codes and subthemes were developed within each COM-B construct. Within Psychological Capability, subthemes captured the need for consistent and reliable COVID-19 vaccine information and access to balanced and jargon-free, risk–benefit information that is tailored to the pregnant individual. The behaviour/opinions of family, friends, and local healthcare providers had a powerful influence on COVID-19 vaccine decisions (Social Opportunity). Integrating the COVID-19 vaccine as part of routine antenatal pathways was believed to support access and sense of familiarity (Physical Opportunity). Participants valued health autonomy, however experienced internal conflict driven by concerns about long-term side effects for their baby (Reflective Motivation). Feelings of fear, lack of empathy from healthcare providers, and anticipated guilt commonly underpinned indecision as to whether to get the vaccine (Automatic Motivation). Our study highlighted that the choice to accept a vaccine during pregnancy generates internal conflict and worry. Several participants cited their concern was primarily around the safety for their baby. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) play a significant part when it comes to decision making about COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant women. HCPs and pregnant women should be involved in the development of interventions to improve the delivery and communication of information. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-023-05958-y. BioMed Central 2023-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10481472/ /pubmed/37674175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05958-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Patterson, Lynsey
Berry, Emma
Parsons, Carole
Clarke, Bronagh
Little, Alison
Beggs, Jillian
Chuter, Antony
Jackson, Tracy
Hsia, Yingfen
McGrath, Hannah
Millman, Catherine
Murphy, Siobhan
Bradley, Declan T.
Milligan, Sarah
Using the COM-B framework to elucidate facilitators and barriers to COVID-19 vaccine uptake in pregnant women: a qualitative study
title Using the COM-B framework to elucidate facilitators and barriers to COVID-19 vaccine uptake in pregnant women: a qualitative study
title_full Using the COM-B framework to elucidate facilitators and barriers to COVID-19 vaccine uptake in pregnant women: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Using the COM-B framework to elucidate facilitators and barriers to COVID-19 vaccine uptake in pregnant women: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Using the COM-B framework to elucidate facilitators and barriers to COVID-19 vaccine uptake in pregnant women: a qualitative study
title_short Using the COM-B framework to elucidate facilitators and barriers to COVID-19 vaccine uptake in pregnant women: a qualitative study
title_sort using the com-b framework to elucidate facilitators and barriers to covid-19 vaccine uptake in pregnant women: a qualitative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37674175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05958-y
work_keys_str_mv AT pattersonlynsey usingthecombframeworktoelucidatefacilitatorsandbarrierstocovid19vaccineuptakeinpregnantwomenaqualitativestudy
AT berryemma usingthecombframeworktoelucidatefacilitatorsandbarrierstocovid19vaccineuptakeinpregnantwomenaqualitativestudy
AT parsonscarole usingthecombframeworktoelucidatefacilitatorsandbarrierstocovid19vaccineuptakeinpregnantwomenaqualitativestudy
AT clarkebronagh usingthecombframeworktoelucidatefacilitatorsandbarrierstocovid19vaccineuptakeinpregnantwomenaqualitativestudy
AT littlealison usingthecombframeworktoelucidatefacilitatorsandbarrierstocovid19vaccineuptakeinpregnantwomenaqualitativestudy
AT beggsjillian usingthecombframeworktoelucidatefacilitatorsandbarrierstocovid19vaccineuptakeinpregnantwomenaqualitativestudy
AT chuterantony usingthecombframeworktoelucidatefacilitatorsandbarrierstocovid19vaccineuptakeinpregnantwomenaqualitativestudy
AT jacksontracy usingthecombframeworktoelucidatefacilitatorsandbarrierstocovid19vaccineuptakeinpregnantwomenaqualitativestudy
AT hsiayingfen usingthecombframeworktoelucidatefacilitatorsandbarrierstocovid19vaccineuptakeinpregnantwomenaqualitativestudy
AT mcgrathhannah usingthecombframeworktoelucidatefacilitatorsandbarrierstocovid19vaccineuptakeinpregnantwomenaqualitativestudy
AT millmancatherine usingthecombframeworktoelucidatefacilitatorsandbarrierstocovid19vaccineuptakeinpregnantwomenaqualitativestudy
AT murphysiobhan usingthecombframeworktoelucidatefacilitatorsandbarrierstocovid19vaccineuptakeinpregnantwomenaqualitativestudy
AT bradleydeclant usingthecombframeworktoelucidatefacilitatorsandbarrierstocovid19vaccineuptakeinpregnantwomenaqualitativestudy
AT milligansarah usingthecombframeworktoelucidatefacilitatorsandbarrierstocovid19vaccineuptakeinpregnantwomenaqualitativestudy